Vela: The Pope Dividend, Part 2: Taking the Weight Off Jason Witten

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,637
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Part two of this series looks at the F and Y back roles in Dallas' attack, and the excessive work Jason Witten currently gets at both spots.

In the '90s, the Cowboys had an ideal pair of interior receivers. Jay Novacek, while only an adequate blocker, was a down-field threat. His F-back counterpart, Daryl Johnston, provided a necessary and rare combination of powerful lead blocking between the tackles and decent speed and hands. As I pointed out in part one of this series, Johnston's receiving skills were very important to the passing game.They look very different from modern duos like Gronkowski and Hernandez, but Novacek and Johnston were a true two-tight end package, from a receiving standpoint. Johnston was a near equal to the Y in half of the Cowboys prime years, as these receiving stats show:

Much has changed since Johnston retired. Fans have wondered why the team continues to spend high draft picks on tight ends. The reason is that the Cowboys have hoped to convert those tight ends into the next Johnston. Thus far, that experiment has failed. Anthony Fasano, Martellus Bennett and Gavin Escobar have have shown flashes as receiving targets, but all failed in the role of lead blocker. That has led Dallas to rely on a strange hybrid: high pick TEs who can block on the edge, and no-hands sluggos like Oliver Hoyte and Lousaka Polite to handle the dirty work on inside runs.

Dallas' inability to get consistent production from the F-back puts a greater burden on Jason Witten. The F and the Y averaged 93 combined catches in the '90s, and 113 over the course of Witten's career. That's an 18% increase, but the current Cowboys throw about 16% more passes than the Triplet's squads did, so the number of passes going to the Y and F are about the same.

What's changed is the size of Y-back Witten's pie. Jay Novacek averaged 60% of the balls that went to him and to Daryl Johnston. In three seasons between '91 and '96, their catch totals were almost identical. These days, Witten gets three of every four passes that goes to interior targets. He's also doing much of F-back blocking on the edge and inside, as I showed in this December piece, and he's making all the big, downfield catches for the F-back position as well, as part one showed. .

Witten right now is the F and the Y for the Cowboys, which makes little sense given his age and the high picks Dallas has spent to find him a sidekick. Here is where new tight ends coach Mike Pope can earn his money.

Read the rest: http://www.cowboyszone.com/2014/02/the-pope-dividend-part-2-taking-weight.html
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Part two of this series looks at the F and Y back roles in Dallas' attack, and the excessive work Jason Witten currently gets at both spots.

In the '90s, the Cowboys had an ideal pair of interior receivers. Jay Novacek, while only an adequate blocker, was a down-field threat. His F-back counterpart, Daryl Johnston, provided a necessary and rare combination of powerful lead blocking between the tackles and decent speed and hands. As I pointed out in part one of this series, Johnston's receiving skills were very important to the passing game.They look very different from modern duos like Gronkowski and Hernandez, but Novacek and Johnston were a true two-tight end package, from a receiving standpoint. Johnston was a near equal to the Y in half of the Cowboys prime years, as these receiving stats show:

Much has changed since Johnston retired. Fans have wondered why the team continues to spend high draft picks on tight ends. The reason is that the Cowboys have hoped to convert those tight ends into the next Johnston. Thus far, that experiment has failed. Anthony Fasano, Martellus Bennett and Gavin Escobar have have shown flashes as receiving targets, but all failed in the role of lead blocker. That has led Dallas to rely on a strange hybrid: high pick TEs who can block on the edge, and no-hands sluggos like Oliver Hoyte and Lousaka Polite to handle the dirty work on inside runs.

Dallas' inability to get consistent production from the F-back puts a greater burden on Jason Witten. The F and the Y averaged 93 combined catches in the '90s, and 113 over the course of Witten's career. That's an 18% increase, but the current Cowboys throw about 16% more passes than the Triplet's squads did, so the number of passes going to the Y and F are about the same.

What's changed is the size of Y-back Witten's pie. Jay Novacek averaged 60% of the balls that went to him and to Daryl Johnston. In three seasons between '91 and '96, their catch totals were almost identical. These days, Witten gets three of every four passes that goes to interior targets. He's also doing much of F-back blocking on the edge and inside, as I showed in this December piece, and he's making all the big, downfield catches for the F-back position as well, as part one showed. .

Witten right now is the F and the Y for the Cowboys, which makes little sense given his age and the high picks Dallas has spent to find him a sidekick. Here is where new tight ends coach Mike Pope can earn his money.

Read the rest: http://www.cowboyszone.com/2014/02/the-pope-dividend-part-2-taking-weight.html

Sadly once again they picked someone that will never be more than an adequate blocker at best. The one time they picked a real good blocker they did not do their due diligence on his head (Tard)
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
A couple of things that I do not feel are accurate in this article.

Johnston had adequate speed? Not really. He would catch flare passes and basically go down as soon as someone took out his legs. He was not running away from anyone. We had Alfredo Roberts do all the heavy lifting as a second TE at the line of scrimmage and he was fine.

Bennett was an adequate, more than adequate, blocker. He could have been good if he could master the nuances of being the move TE. That is what was the common complaint at the time. We did not have the tight end who could line up in the backfield and be that move player, while Witten played in-line.

I just think we spend too much time attempting to convert players into these roles instead of finding out what they do best and showcasing it.

We spent most of this year trying to make Hanna this player and with limited success. Then we just gave up and signed Clutts to be the lead blocker and the run game got better. It just seems we are making things much more complicated than they need to be.
 

Wolfpack

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,696
Reaction score
3,973
I just think we spend too much time attempting to convert players into these roles instead of finding out what they do best and showcasing it.

We spent most of this year trying to make Hanna this player and with limited success. Then we just gave up and signed Clutts to be the lead blocker and the run game got better. It just seems we are making things much more complicated than they need to be.

Excellent points. Jason is not a very flexible man.
 

Zimmy Lives

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,165
Reaction score
4,631
A couple of things that I do not feel are accurate in this article.

Johnston had adequate speed? Not really. He would catch flare passes and basically go down as soon as someone took out his legs. He was not running away from anyone. We had Alfredo Roberts do all the heavy lifting as a second TE at the line of scrimmage and he was fine.

Bennett was an adequate, more than adequate, blocker. He could have been good if he could master the nuances of being the move TE. That is what was the common complaint at the time. We did not have the tight end who could line up in the backfield and be that move player, while Witten played in-line.

I just think we spend too much time attempting to convert players into these roles instead of finding out what they do best and showcasing it.

We spent most of this year trying to make Hanna this player and with limited success. Then we just gave up and signed Clutts to be the lead blocker and the run game got better. It just seems we are making things much more complicated than they need to be.

This (in bold) is the Cowboys' biggest challenge in a nutshell. Great coaches/staff (Belichick) scheme around their talent's strengths and their opponent's weaknesses. The Cowboys do neither.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
34,289
Reaction score
19,696
Sadly once again they picked someone that will never be more than an adequate blocker at best. The one time they picked a real good blocker they did not do their due diligence on his head (Tard)

I think he was pickd t be the eventual replacement for Witten
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Mark Fasano? Tee-hee.

I actually like the chances of the TE production improving under Pope. Throw in a late round or CFA HB, and I think we've got a good shot to improve there next season. He's a punching bag for no other reason than his draft stock and the position he plays, but Escobar and Hannah both have potential to be good role players for us, too.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
CowboysFaninDCst: 5439051 said:
I think he was pickd t be the eventual replacement for Witten

How was that possible when at the time it was clear Witten was going to be around well into a second contract?
 
Top