Staggerlee
chip_gilkey
- Messages
- 2,671
- Reaction score
- 257
Aikmaniac;3768507 said:Who has the best chance of beating Philly in the playoffs?
Green Bay or NY?
Do you have to ask?
Aikmaniac;3768507 said:Who has the best chance of beating Philly in the playoffs?
Green Bay or NY?
Everlastingxxx;3768504 said:Did we bet? You never responded back that night!
I dont like any of the NFC teams. All of them are very beatable.
Oh, part of my stipulation is Vick has to be playing and healthy, lol.
Aikmaniac;3768507 said:Who has the best chance of beating Philly in the playoffs?
Green Bay or NY?
dbair1967;3768514 said::laugh2:
I tried to tell you man. They arnt that good.
theebs;3768486 said:also just like to add, my biggest gripe still to this day of the parcells tenure he passed on winfield when he was ready to come here going into the 04 season.
One of the biggest beatdowns all last year was when the sorry Panthers totally wiped the carpet with the Giants who were playing for the playoffs. Just awesome.dbair1967 said:Atlanta is really not that good, if they take the game for granted they might get beat. I'm sure John Fox is going to go all out to go out in style there.
Everlastingxxx;3768535 said:They clinched their division and have the 3rd seed. Right now they are the 3rd best team in the NFC.
Chocolate Lab;3768539 said:But we had Pete Hunter...
Seriously, I didn't know that about Winfield. I hate corners that won't tackle, so you know I like him.
newlander;3768550 said:Eagles are frauds as usual. They'll be one and done: Saints, Falcons, Pack, and Bears are all better than them by quite a bit: specifically on the defensive side of the ball.
New York has them. Really?Those two games they played against Philly sure didn't look like it. I think Atl does have them and the other 3:Chi, NO, GB have them just not sure on the Giants but they aren't going to the playoffs anyway.:laugh1:theebs;3768565 said:well I think the eagles are going to lose in one of the first 2 rounds also because that is what reid does, he screws up a game in the playoffs on the offensive side of the ball, they end up behind and it goes bad.
but the trick is, you have to have athletes that can slow maclin and jackson and then have the athletes to have someone to get to vick.
I think atlanta does not have that, the rams do not have that.
Chicago, green bay, ny and new orleans have that.
although I just get the feeling that green bay defense may turn into a pumpkin here.
New orleans I dont think has the athletes up front but williams will scheme it and it will be very risky. They can do that though with the amount of points they are capable of scoring.
Just my gut feeling, they have the corners and the ends to apply what teams have been doing to make vick look pretty average at times.mldardy;3768607 said:New York has them. Really?Those two games they played against Philly sure didn't look like it. I think Atl does have them and the other 3:Chi, NO, GB have them just not sure on the Giants but they aren't going to the playoffs anyway.:laugh1:
Joe Realist;3768656 said:I would love to see GB go to Philly and beat them
newlander;3768550 said:Eagles are frauds as usual. They'll be one and done: Saints, Falcons, Pack, and Bears are all better than them by quite a bit: specifically on the defensive side of the ball.
dbair1967;3768207 said:Its called your an idiot.
