Wade Phillips and the 46 Defense (READ IT)

Cherry

New Member
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
from bloggingtheboys.com

Today's feature article is by Rafael Vela entitled: Who's Your [Football]
Daddy? Wade Phillips and his Two Football Fathers. I'll let Rafael do the set-up for the article and tell you more about it.



Wade Phillips dusted off the 46 scheme he learned from Buddy Ryan to rescue his season. Dallas played the 46 close to half the time in the Commanders rematch win and used it a lot down the stretch. Dallas has an improved coverage secondary this year, with a lot more speed at the safety position. For this reason, I expect Phillips to blitz much more heavily this year. With a trusted -- and bigger -- Keith Brooking playing MLB instead of Zach Thomas, I think Wade Philips will unleash the Bear package and its blitzes a lot, lot more this year.

-- rv



[Excerpt from the actual magazine article]:

Dallas limped into its bye having surrendered 439 rushing yards in its previous three games. Good teams were out muscling Dallas's front seven. On the line, only Ratliff played consistently good ball. His backup Tank Johnson, either played very well or hardly at all. The same was true of right end Chris Canty, who could dominate for a series or a quarter, and then disappear for equal amounts of time. Left end Marcus Spears was playing better football, but he lacked big play ability.

[snip]

Phillips then made a tactical switch, elevating the 46 from a change-up, third down defense to his primary scheme.

Buddy Ryan created the 46 scheme on the philosophy that the defense should dictate play to the offense. It modifies a base 4-3 scheme to maximize interior pass rush, create rush mismatches on the edges, and put eight men within five yards of the line of scrimmage to create numerical edges for the defense against running plays.

The first change involved moving the best pass rusher from end to nose tackle. In Chicago, Ryan lined up Dan Hampton between his defensive tackles. In Philadelphia, Reggie White lined up on the nose. The thinking is to put your best rusher on one of the line's weakest pass blockers one-on-one. Because two defensive tackles are playing over the offensive guards, neither one of them can help the center. On the strong side, the 46 deploys two linebackers, one on each side of the tight end. One or both of them can rush, creating an overload on that edge if the tight end releases on a pass route. On the weak side, the speed rusher lines up wide and gets to duel the tackle in space.

The scheme plays to Dallas's strengths. Dallas's best rushing lineman was already on the nose, but putting two tackles alongside him meant he could not be double teamed. DeMarcus Ware was already playing the Richard Dent/Clyde Simmons role, only from a two point stance instead of with his hand down. Bradie James emerged as a rushing linebacker in 2008 and lining him up next to Greg Ellis gave offensive coordinators headaches. Both of them finished with eight sacks and an opponent could not be sure if one or both of these skilled rushers would attack the quarterback on any given play.

The 46 also covered up the Cowboys rush weakness at inside linebacker. With three defensive linemen parked over the three interior offensive linemen, Dallas could play a smaller, speedier middle linebacker and let him float to the ball. Dallas had such a player in the 227-pound Kevin Burnett. He had excelled in coverage as Dallas's nickel backer but the coaches had been reluctant to play him on first and second downs. The 46 made him an every-down player.

What's more, the Cowboys could shift easily from set to set. They could deploy in their base set and then slide both defensive ends inside. James would then walk from his strongside inside linebacker slot to the gap vacated by the end and the 46 was in place.
 

Four

New Member
Messages
2,601
Reaction score
1
I don't think he dusted off anything, I suspect wade has been using the 46 everywhere he has coached.

I can't back it up because I never paid that close attention to him before, but he is one hell of a defensive coach and I think he just goes with what works.

when he leaves I think the defense will take a step back, maybe 2.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Four;2830356 said:
I don't think he dusted off anything, I suspect wade has been using the 46 everywhere he has coached.
He has.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
It's not really a 46 IMO. I mean, it that's what you want to call it, thats fine but a 46 is different then what we played.
 

OAM

New Member
Messages
327
Reaction score
0
Wanna see a 46? Watch the Philadelphia Eagles.
 

ZeroClub

just trying to get better
Messages
7,619
Reaction score
1
Looked more like an 86ed defense during those last minutes versus Baltimore.
 

Four

New Member
Messages
2,601
Reaction score
1
some of you don't even need a reason, you will just ***** and moan no matter what the thread is about.

I don't see how you don't get tired of it.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
ABQCOWBOY;2830371 said:
It's not really a 46 IMO. I mean, it that's what you want to call it, thats fine but a 46 is different then what we played.
Well, inasmuch as a the "46" is a term describing how defensive players line up on the field, then yeah it's really a "46."
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
EPL0c0;2830404 said:
46 worked GREAT vs Baltimore

ZeroClub;2830388 said:
Looked more like an 86ed defense during those last minutes versus Baltimore.
FYI, they weren't in the 46 against either of those touchdowns.
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
theogt;2830418 said:
FYI, they weren't in the 46 against either of those touchdowns.

You are correct, Dallas was in its base 3-4. Dallas expected the run on those plays and even called the right set, just too many missed tackles.


And many have mentioned the very thing Vela does in his article, Wades' use of the 46 is what improved the D went it went into a slump. The 46 also made James a borderline pro bowler. I think a guy like Jason Williams would become an absolute monster playing James spot in this front, while Hodge could be just as impactful in Burnett's role as the sideline to sideline/coverage MLB. The front 7 would be just as big, but crazy fast w/the addition of those two as starters. One day .... if Wade is still here, that is.
 

SaltwaterServr

Blank Paper Offends Me
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
1
theogt;2830409 said:
Well, inasmuch as a the "46" is a term describing how defensive players line up on the field, then yeah it's really a "46."

The 46 isn't really telling you how the players are lined up as the 3-4, 4-3, 4-2-5, or 3-3-5 is telling you how the players are lined up.

The 46 was a player's number not a description of the alignment. 8 men in the box, 6 man line and the six is incidental to the "46" description.

While you call the 3-4 in verbage the "three, four" alignment you can call the 46 the four-six, but it's really the forty-six in how Buddy Ryan invented it.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
SaltwaterServr;2830476 said:
The 46 isn't really telling you how the players are lined up as the 3-4, 4-3, 4-2-5, or 3-3-5 is telling you how the players are lined up.

The 46 was a player's number not a description of the alignment. 8 men in the box, 6 man line and the six is incidental to the "46" description.

While you call the 3-4 in verbage the "three, four" alignment you can call the 46 the four-six, but it's really the forty-six in how Buddy Ryan invented it.
Yes, I think we're all aware that "46" refers to a player's jersey number and not how many down linemen vs. linebackers there are.

However, the 46 is most certainly a term used to describe how the defense lines up.
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
SaltwaterServr;2830476 said:
The 46 isn't really telling you how the players are lined up as the 3-4, 4-3, 4-2-5, or 3-3-5 is telling you how the players are lined up.

The 46 was a player's number not a description of the alignment. 8 men in the box, 6 man line and the six is incidental to the "46" description.

While you call the 3-4 in verbage the "three, four" alignment you can call the 46 the four-six, but it's really the forty-six in how Buddy Ryan invented it.

In short, its the FORTY six, not a FOUR-six. You'd think people would understand that right off since it is never written w/a hyphen, at least by knowledgeable writers. :D
 

SaltwaterServr

Blank Paper Offends Me
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
1
BAT;2830461 said:
You are correct, Dallas was in its base 3-4. Dallas expected the run on those plays and even called the right set, just too many missed tackles.


And many have mentioned the very thing Vela does in his article, Wades' use of the 46 is what improved the D went it went into a slump. The 46 also made James a borderline pro bowler. I think a guy like Jason Williams would become an absolute monster playing James spot in this front, while Hodge could be just as impactful in Burnett's role as the sideline to sideline/coverage MLB. The front 7 would be just as big, but crazy fast w/the addition of those two as starters. One day .... if Wade is still here, that is.

This is the line in the second TD:

Spencer Ratliff Johnson Unknown Spears Ware

Burnett Thomas

29 Hamlin

First TD was a 3-4 set.
 

SaltwaterServr

Blank Paper Offends Me
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
1
theogt;2830479 said:
Yes, I think we're all aware that "46" refers to a player's jersey number and not how many down linemen vs. linebackers there are.

However, the 46 is most certainly a term used to describe how the defense lines up.

True, all of that.

I'd be willing to wager you give a large number of football fans the term "46 defense" and they'd try to put 4 down lineman with 6 linebackers on the field.
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
SaltwaterServr;2830484 said:
This is the line in the second TD:

Spencer Ratliff Johnson Unknown Spears Ware

Burnett Thomas

29 Hamlin

First TD was a 3-4 set.

Are you sure about this? I thought I saw Bradie both times. Plus I have not seen a package w/both Burnett and Thomas on the field at the same time. It is usually Bradie-Thomas (base 3-4) or Bradie-Burnett (46) or just Burnett (dime).
 

SaltwaterServr

Blank Paper Offends Me
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
1
BAT;2830495 said:
Are you sure about this? I thought I saw Bradie both times. Plus I have not seen a package w/both Burnett and Thomas on the field at the same time. It is usually Bradie-Thomas (base 3-4) or Bradie-Burnett (46) or just Burnett (dime).

Lemme check the video again, and I'll edit this.

Yep, you're right it was Bradie James and Zach Thomas. I've always had a bad habit the last few years of thinking Burnett was 56 and I cannot fathom why. One of those things I guess that once you get it wrong it sticks as somehow being right.

There were four down and both OLB's up on the LOS. Both safeties up and Newman out wide.

Here's the link to NFL.com's video of that horrendous crap, 2:54 mark on the main video.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter?game_...mecenter&season=2008&week=REG16&override=true

If you pick the fourth video box over under the main screen and go to 1:22 in that video, you can see the defensive formation from the offensive backfield. There's also a close in angle that gives me a better look at the line on the LOS.

Spencer Ratliff Spears Canty Possibly? X? Demarcus

Dang screen is too small to see, or my eyes are too old.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
OAM;2830386 said:
Wanna see a 46? Watch the Philadelphia Eagles.

Eagles bring their pressure off the corner or with the safeties. And they play zone coverages when they blitz. They put in 4 DEs on obvious passing downs. What's the 46 connection you're talking about?

DallasDomination;2830424 said:
4-6, 3-4, 4-3...Just get it done.

The takeaway here is that it doesn't matter how it gets done when most of our fans don't get it anyway. Those that can read the scoreboard, but little else, have no truck with excuses.
 
Top