at some point i hope Kessler gets to cross examine Goodell and Friel
he will rip them to shreds
Wallace just tweeted part of the filing that shows they would like the stay ideally by September 19 (when week 3 practices begin) but no later than September 26. If this is such a big emergency, why are you telling the judge's that they can put this off another week?
I'd love to see it. I'm skeptical it will ever happen. If the NFL loses on the procedural process portion of the case, I have a hunch they won't fight the revocation.at some point i hope Kessler gets to cross examine Goodell and Friel
he will rip them to shreds
Yes, but they didn't file until after the arbitration ruling was issued. Of course, they had the unfair advantage of knowing exactly when the arbitrator (Goodell) was going to issue his ruling so they easily won the race to the courthouse. But (technically) they didn't file their motion while everyone was still awaiting the result of the arbitration hearing.
There is a large section of society that view their image as damaged by doing this. The NFL only cares about how their image looks to a certain segment of society (women's groups and their allies).Good Point, but I think they are more worried about their image. That's all this is about, the NFL's image.
You my friend......get IT!The NFL wins here no matter what.
If they get slapped down, they can just say, "Hey, we tried everything we could." That covers their tracks with the overzealous media and DV crowd.
This is true. Its also so sad how easy it is to manipulate the masses.The NFL wins here no matter what.
If they get slapped down, they can just say, "Hey, we tried everything we could." That covers their tracks with the overzealous media and DV crowd.
...like telling your kid " Don't do what I do, Do what I Say"
That is not how these trials are run. The lawyers present their arguments, and their arguments certainly include things which any party may have said, but you don't put someone on the stand and cross examine them.at some point i hope Kessler gets to cross examine Goodell and Friel
he will rip them to shreds
There is a large section of society that view their image as damaged by doing this. The NFL only cares about how their image looks to a certain segment of society (women's groups and their allies).
That is not how these trials are run. The lawyers present their arguments, and their arguments certainly include things which any party may have said, but you don't put someone on the stand and cross examine them.
My understanding is that if the courts allow Elliott to file suit prior to the arbitration ruling, then you create a situation where everyone will simply sue prior to the arbitration ruling being rendered. The whole point of arbitration is to not have the courts involved.I could be wrong but I thought the context of the comment in their filing about if Elliot can do this, so can everyone else was referring to suing the league once they are suspended not about jumping the gun.
This case is typical NFL. "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!" In this case the man behind the curtain is due process and fundamental fairness.
They take the men for granted, and they aren't wrong.Which is really stupid on their part because women constitute a small segment of the NFL fandom.
My understanding is that if the courts allow Elliott to file suit prior to the arbitration ruling, then you create a situation where everyone will simply sue prior to the arbitration ruling being rendered. The whole point of arbitration is to not have the courts involved.