Wants and Needs

Shake_Tiller

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,438
Reaction score
1,563
Looking to next season, from a talent perspective, what do the Cowboys "need," and what do they "want," assuming no further career-threatening injuries?

I would argue the offensive "need' is OT, with an infusion at OG and at TE "wants." Some might also want to replace the RB or to find a supplement to Pollard if Elliott were to be replaced, which would shock me.

The defensive "needs" are a DT, a DE if Aldon Smith leaves (and probably if he doesn't), a LB, 2 CBs and a safety. Quite a shopping list.

The defense must be rebuilt unless we are comfortable resigning players who have disappointed, and unless we want to ride with Jaylon Smith and hope 2020 is an aberration.

Your defensive building blocks are Lawrence, maybe Gallimore, Gregory if you are confident in his health, Vander Esch, again assuming you think he can stay healthy, and Diggs. Everyone else looks like a hope, a prayer, a probable FA departure or a stop-gap.

Maybe Hill is a viable rotation DT. Maybe Wilson can be a decent S given pass rush support. Maybe one of the young LBs (Bernard or Gifford) can be a viable starter. Maybe Anae can be a rotational DE.

But I wouldn't count on any of that.

There are other decent contributors on defense (Antwaun Woods, Brown and Armstrong come to mind), but they probably top out at being replacement level starters.

Emphasize defense in talent acquisition. Assuming they sign Prescott, they really are in pretty good shape on offense unless they need to replace Smith at OT. That's the one offensive position that could distract me as I add talent. If there is an opportunity to get a really good OT, take it.

The defense can be fixed relatively quickly if they draft intensively and well. A dynamic pass rusher or 2 would make a huge difference in what is required in the back end. If players such as A. Smith, Crawford, Lee, X. Woods, Lewis and Awuzie move on, the Cowboys can play in FA.

On defense, they might have to take a risk. Spend the FA $$$ on higher-level players (not necessarily high-end, 1st-day signings but the talent you have to lock up in the 1st week or 2 of free agency). That means relying on the middle rounds of the draft for depth, but this team needs viable starters.

A decision on Jaylon is critical, and the returns are not promising.

Otherwise, make at least 5 of their next 6 premium additions (draft and/or free agency) CBs and pass rushers.

If they can supplement Lawrence, Gallimore and Gregory with a 1st or 2nd round pick and a solid FA signing, they could be in decent shape. Hill and Armstrong are a start on adequate depth.

LB is a weird spot for this team. Vander Esch and Jaylon ought to be foundation pieces. But the former hasn't stayed healthy, and the latter hasn't played well. I wonder if Jaylon is just a spot 3-4 pass rusher. LB is a "want," for now, and probably has to stand in line behind DT, DE, CB and S. But they have to be honest in evaluating whether it is a "need."

The secondary is an almost total rebuild. Diggs is a good start, and Wilson shows signs of being an adequate player and potential playmaker given a strong pass rush.

I'd be tempted to roll the dice on signing 1 of the best 1-3 CBs available in FA. Then I'd spend at least 2 of the first 4 draft picks on the secondary, maybe including a 2nd or a 3rd on a S.

Best case, wherever they land in the draft (probably from 3 to 8, or 19 if they miraculously win their horrible division), they can parlay an available QB prospect into a favorable trade down. Seems good QB prospects are scattered through the 1st round, so that isn't a pipe dream.

The Cowboys can write off most offensive woes to incredibly poor luck with injuries. They must face facts on defense. Many of their players aren't good enough and must be aggressively replaced.

No objection to last year's opportunistic choice of Lamb. There can't be distractions in the next draft. If BPA isn't a defensive player, trade back, even at a modest return. Maybe draft the Oregon OT, but only after trading down at least a couple slots. The QB prospects might make it possible.
 
Its gonna take more than 1 off season to rebuild this team. Overhauling the offensive line can be done over the next 2 or 3 years will still beign good (if healthy). They can't afford much in the way of free agency, so this draft i say go for best player available, we need help everywhere except wideout.
 
Teams needs, as they do not want any player but BPA within reason.
It is more the fans that WANT certain players, even if unrealistic at times. Same as dumping of players.

Defense and OL seems to be at the top of most fans list.
As many want QB in there, also, but many as a "want" as opposed to a "need". Then that comes down to pay Dak or go with a QB for less $$$. However that will be a decision if they are in position to draft one.

Hard to really tell where we will be electing at. At times I think we will win the division, and pick 19th, other times I think we will win 3 or 4 more games and be 8th to 14th.
however, I would not be surprised we pick at 5th or 6th.

So the wants and needs will vary as the records goes along.

I want and we need a S, 2 S's actually. Probably another CB, and and OL but does not need to be a 1st round pick.
 
Teams needs, as they do not want any player but BPA within reason.
It is more the fans that WANT certain players, even if unrealistic at times. Same as dumping of players.

Defense and OL seems to be at the top of most fans list.
As many want QB in there, also, but many as a "want" as opposed to a "need". Then that comes down to pay Dak or go with a QB for less $$$. However that will be a decision if they are in position to draft one.

Hard to really tell where we will be electing at. At times I think we will win the division, and pick 19th, other times I think we will win 3 or 4 more games and be 8th to 14th.
however, I would not be surprised we pick at 5th or 6th.

So the wants and needs will vary as the records goes along.

I want and we need a S, 2 S's actually. Probably another CB, and and OL but does not need to be a 1st round pick.
I'm no personnel expert, but I tried to think in this context -- what are the accepted givens of football, and especially the modern NFL? You must have a solid QB1, solid OTs, a solid pass rush and solid CBs. Not everyone, but most seem to agree on those. Also, what is possible? Most want a new GM, but that requires a new owner, and I'm not holding my breath.

BPA ought to be part of an equation -- BPA + Position Importance + Team need. And a draft must have an eye on 3-5 years rather than just a year.

The best organizations, I think, manipulate within taking BPA. They do so by moving in the draft if the BPA + Position importance + Team need are out of alignment. That's how I tried to think about it.

Of course, the X factor is generational talent. You probably don't want to pass on Deion Sanders because you have 2 good CBs, or on Anthony Munoz because you have a good LT. There are no sure things (Tony Mandarich), but of a team is convicted that a prospect has generational talent and no red flags, that probably should be the pick in most scenarios.

The problem is when teams such as the Cowboys broaden the definition of generational talent and take poor risks as a result.

Hope that makes sense.
 
I'm no personnel expert, but I tried to think in this context -- what are the accepted givens of football, and especially the modern NFL? You must have a solid QB1, solid OTs, a solid pass rush and solid CBs. Not everyone, but most seem to agree on those. Also, what is possible? Most want a new GM, but that requires a new owner, and I'm not holding my breath.

BPA ought to be part of an equation -- BPA + Position Importance + Team need. And a draft must have an eye on 3-5 years rather than just a year.

The best organizations, I think, manipulate within taking BPA. They do so by moving in the draft if the BPA + Position importance + Team need are out of alignment. That's how I tried to think about it.

Of course, the X factor is generational talent. You probably don't want to pass on Deion Sanders because you have 2 good CBs, or on Anthony Munoz because you have a good LT. There are no sure things (Tony Mandarich), but of a team is convicted that a prospect has generational talent and no red flags, that probably should be the pick in most scenarios.

The problem is when teams such as the Cowboys broaden the definition of generational talent and take poor risks as a result.

Hope that makes sense.

Makes a lot of sense.
As jerry did stick to the board last draft, and came away with CeeDee. Though was not a position of need, though some think so. But it was a no brainer BPA possible generational player. And somewhat of a need also.

Hopefully with the new staff it seems they looked at the draft differently than with th old staff. Hope that continues.
 
Makes a lot of sense.
As jerry did stick to the board last draft, and came away with CeeDee. Though was not a position of need, though some think so. But it was a no brainer BPA possible generational player. And somewhat of a need also.

Hopefully with the new staff it seems they looked at the draft differently than with th old staff. Hope that continues.
The 1975 draft is a good example. The Falcons picked 1st and took Steve Bartkowski. The Cowboys took Randy White 2nd, and he was inarguably the superior player. But hard to knock the Falcons. Bartkowski was a Pro Bowl QB and made that a credible franchise.

On the other hand, the Colts somehow decided G Ken Huff was a better option than Walter Payton. And the Browns chose DE Mack Mitchell over Robert Brazile.

There were 3 HoF players among the first 6 picks. They went at 2, 4 and 6. The smart teams had the right players identified.
 
Its gonna take more than 1 off season to rebuild this team. Overhauling the offensive line can be done over the next 2 or 3 years will still beign good (if healthy). They can't afford much in the way of free agency, so this draft i say go for best player available, we need help everywhere except wideout.
One thing on the Cowboys' side: absent the draft and FA, not many "bad" teams can reasonably expect to add next season Prescott, T. Smith, Collins and Jarwin. That probably "fixes" the offense, which solves about half the problem. Smith is the biggest risk.

Dallas can and should be more laser-focused on defense than the typical "bad" team. Plus, the fact several contracts are ending gives them some flexibility to add defensive players more suited to their current system, which is an underrated NFL conundrum.

Everything won't be fixed immediately, but every NFL team has some replacement level starters. History has shown us the gap between good and bad isn't that big.

We all wish we had more confidence in the front office.
 
Despite all of those wants/needs, and the people charged with addressing them, we'll be back to 13-3 predictions here by next August.
You are correct sir, and that's one of the Joy's of sports. Hope springs eternal even while bleeding to death.
 
One thing on the Cowboys' side: absent the draft and FA, not many "bad" teams can reasonably expect to add next season Prescott, T. Smith, Collins and Jarwin. That probably "fixes" the offense, which solves about half the problem. Smith is the biggest risk.

Dallas can and should be more laser-focused on defense than the typical "bad" team. Plus, the fact several contracts are ending gives them some flexibility to add defensive players more suited to their current system, which is an underrated NFL conundrum.

Everything won't be fixed immediately, but every NFL team has some replacement level starters. History has shown us the gap between good and bad isn't that big.

We all wish we had more confidence in the front office.
I agree! I want a CB in the top 10 and best defensive player available after the 1st round...
 
I'd say new Owner and GM, HC and starting QB.

Change out all three(or 4) and there will be the BEGINNINGS of potential change.

Not until then.
 
Last edited:

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,678
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top