at 15 seconds, the ref is in front of CJ. you can't see his knee or elbow
I don't particularly care whether it's the fault of the refs or the competition committee. Why should I?
I am not suggesting you should do anything. But the league wanted points because the fans wanted points. Thus rules have been instituted which allow the advantage to the offensive players in the passing game. However, there are some of those rules which has such a gray area that are left for interpretation.
This is one example.
Did anybody else question if the 2nd Cruz TD was incomplete? I think I remember either last season or the year before that, Megatron scoring a TD @ Chicago but it was ruled incomplete because he lost control after the act of catching, controlling, and crossing the plane. Then, you have today where you have similar cases, but a disparity between calls. Any thoughts?
The question is were both of them going to the ground on the catch. If they both were going to the ground they have to maintain control through the catch. CJ was definitely going to the ground on the catch, by rule his is incomplete. Cruz is questionable as to whether he was going to the ground with the catch so I think that one is just a matter of opinion - I can see it both ways.
The first 2 TDs by Cruz were missed blatant holding calls and I am getting sick of it. We get a holding called and a 1/2 second WR screen pass and they hook and grab all night and get 1 holding call - it was absurd!
you are right. So I am arguing against the rule. I believe in the field of play, it should be a fumble, but the end zone should made it an instant touchdown and it is not possible to fumble after a touchdown.
This is what Pereira had to say. I'm not sure I'm buying it. If Cruz's stretch meant he completed the catch then Johnson's stretch should have as well.
This is what Pereira had to say. I'm not sure I'm buying it. If Cruz's stretch meant he completed the catch then Johnson's stretch should have as well.
and I would say most agree. our eyes say TD and and our common sense says TD, but the rule is quite clear that it's an incompletion. So my question is, how was it not even reviewed?
He's wrong. He has to maintain possession through the entire process of going to the ground in order to complete the catch, he did not do so. It's pretty black and white.
Cruz was down with his elbow prior to the ball coming lose.
That alone makes this different then the CJ play.
Watch the video again. It is clear the ball crosses the plain, and the elbow is down before the ball ever hits the ground and comes lose.
So it probably was reviewed, but was confirmed correctly as a touch down.
I agree with what you're saying, but if the rule says if they catch the ball in the air, they have to control it through the whole process, I still think Cruz was still in the process of falling, since he was still moving.
And if you watch the megatron catch closely, his elbow hits the ground, but the ball doesn't move until a split second later when the ball comes in contact with the ground.
None of that matters. If he was going to the ground during the catch (which I believe he was), then he has to maintain possession all the way through going down: doesn't matter at all when or where his body touches down. I was screaming at the TV to have that one reviewed. Thought it was pretty clearly a no-catch.Cruz was down with his elbow prior to the ball coming lose.
That alone makes this different then the CJ play.
Watch the video again. It is clear the ball crosses the plain, and the elbow is down before the ball ever hits the ground and comes lose.
This is what Pereira had to say. I'm not sure I'm buying it. If Cruz's stretch meant he completed the catch then Johnson's stretch should have as well.