I was skimming through a Washington Post article today about McVay and Goff with the Rams. The Post was obviously doing a spread on them because Scott was the OC for the Commanders last year and they played them today.
Basically they quoted Franklin, Goff's college coach and how he went to visit Goff when he was being coached by Scott in training camp. Basically the whole article had some nice commentary where Franklin spoke in the context of NFL coaches preparing college QBs sucked in reality, forcing QBs into a system and not adjusting them to what they do well. His whole emphasis was that NFL coaches ruin many college players, while most people say the opposite.
It had some nice commentary on even spread offenses and how people criticize certain offenses without legitimacy saying it doesn't translate well for QBs going into NFL. He basically said for example how people say we didn't go through progressions on the spread, or something to the effect, which wasn't true at all and they did it all the time, but it's just a matter of terminology. His whole argument was that it's the coaching that sucks and the NFL is full of bad coaches.
He mentioned that Dak in Mississippi Stare they basically only used half the field for him in his offense but the first year in Dallas they did well utilizing what he does well.
Basically the whole emphasis was that he feels Goff is in good hands, because McVey focuses the offense on what Goff does well and practices around it.
One can say this is the case with Romo having to do deal with guys like Garrett..