3rdEyewarrior
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,903
- Reaction score
- 3,544
He cheaper and more versatile. gallup was faster ced was quicker.
Oh is that right.He cheaper and more versatile. gallup was faster ced was quicker.
he also plays the slot and can make you miss.Oh is that right.
straight ahead speed he was. ced has more lateral quickness.Huh? Gallup was not faster than Cedric Wilson
See Turpin. We are in good shape at receiver.he also plays the slot and can make you miss.
I like both. im talking gallup and Wilson.See Turpin. We are in good shape at receiver.
He cost to much. The only reason this came up is due to Waddle getting Hurt and Wilson getting playing time today.I NEVER thought we should have got rid of Wilson. He had a low key outstanding 2021 season. Could even throw the ball on gadget plays. Had great repport with Dak.
This, I believe I even made the argument here that we should’ve kept Wilson over Gallup due to being cheaper and the obvious rapport with Dak as well as a lack of a major knee injury.I NEVER thought we should have got rid of Wilson. He had a low key outstanding 2021 season. Could even throw the ball on gadget plays. Had great repport with Dak.
What a odd time to rue over Wilson lol. I wouldn't have signed him for that contract either.He cheaper and more versatile. gallup was faster ced was quicker.
See Turpin. We are in good shape at receiverA
gallup is the 4th best receiver on the teamWhat a odd time to rue over Wilson lol. I wouldn't have signed him for that contract either.
Exactly. That deal was way too costly and the Cowboys are getting the same production out of Cooks and Tolbert for far less.What a odd time to rue over Wilson lol. I wouldn't have signed him for that contract either.
Exactly.Exactly. That deal was way too costly and the Cowboys are getting the same production out of Cooks and Tolbert for far less.
gallup?Exactly. That deal was way too costly and the Cowboys are getting the same production out of Cooks and Tolbert for far less.