The Packers had over 15 players out on injury that year. My whole point is the simple fact that Dallas can't seem to get over one injury, let alone several. The Packers also lost their #1 WR this year and their O hasn't skipped a beat. Do you think our O would be just as good without Dez, even with Romo? This is a very weak-minded team that loses confidence at the drop of a hat. What was the Pats record the year they lost Brady?.....
It's not 1 injury though. It's a HUGE injury. It's a QB driven league and there are only about 15 serviceable or better QB's in this league. After that, it's a huge dropoff.
And we lost our #1 WR who is one of the most productive players in all of the NFL.
The year the Patriots lost Brady, they still didn't make the playoffs. And from 2000 to about 2013 they have played in the worst division in football. When Ryan Tannehill is the best QB in your division in the past 15 seasons, it's a little different than having faced QB's like McNabb and Eli.
At least with the Packers they had enough firepower on offense to build up leads, keep their defense off the field and just outscore the opponent.
Last year we had a TON of injuries on defense. But, we had a healthy offense...we scored points, we ate up the ToP on offense and we kept the defense off the field and in great positions to win games.
So we have won despite injuries.
YR