BruceWayne
Tennione72
- Messages
- 878
- Reaction score
- 53
That was a BS call
joseephuss;1208187 said:The receiver blocked Ware below the waist. It is pretty clear by the definition of the rule.
Doomsday101;1208269 said:No it's not. A crackback is a block behind the defender at the knees however that is not even called much for the most part it is when a defender is engaged with one blocker and a second blocker hits him low. Plain and simple that was a poor call that went in our favor.
joseephuss;1208305 said:That is not what the rule book defines the penalty to be. It isn't limited to behind the defender. It includes any block below the waist. They changed that rule several years ago. It used to only be blocks in the back by the receiver was considered a crack back. They then included any contact below the waist.
4. Crackback: Eligible receivers who take or move to a position more than two yards outside the tackle may not block an opponent below the waist if they then move back inside to block.
I thought I saw Crayton make that same type of block later in the game on a MBIII run, but I didn't see where he lined up. Initial alignment plays a role in whether it is legal to go at the legs or not.
Thehoofbite;1208069 said:I thought there was a huge holding call on the Giants first drive that was missed
Catch-22;1208341 said:The crack back call was the worst in the game in my opinion.
The Giants don't have much room to complain though, because the very next play Brandon Jacobs rumbled through our secondary on that screen for 50 yards.
Doomsday101;1207953 said:I know Aikman commented he saw nothing on that play that would be considered PI.
Catch-22;1208341 said:The crack back call was the worst in the game in my opinion.
Dallyjake;1208379 said:The PI call was complete garbage.
Not only was Ware held on the TD pass, the Gaurd helped out by bashing Ware in the face too(could have had two flags on that play). Where in the world were Roy and KD on the coverage though?
AdamJT13;1208434 said:How could it possibly be the worst call when it was ABSOLUTELY CORRECT?
Anyone who says that's not a penalty doesn't know the rule. And anyone who says that happens all of the time and never gets called doesn't know what he's talking about. The penalty is very specific. So while there are low blocks in every game, they're not the same as an illegal block like that one.
Here's the exact rule (Rule 12, Section 2, Article 10) --
Article 10
At the snap, an offensive player who is aligned in a position more than two yards laterally outside an offensive tackle, or a player who is in a backfield position at the snap and then moves to a position more than two yards laterally outside a tackle, may not clip an opponent anywhere, nor may he contact an opponent below the waist if the blocker is moving toward the position where the ball was snapped from, and the contact occurs within an area five yards on either side of the line of scrimmage.
In other words, if a player lines up more than two yards outside the offensive tackle (as Tyree did) blocks down toward the ball (as Tyree did) and blocks below the waist (as Tyree did), that's a penalty.
Doomsday101;1207953 said:I thought it was a bad call. I know Aikman commented he saw nothing on that play that would be considered PI. However by the same token I did not see the Giants commit the crackback they were charged with
FuzzyLumpkins;1208605 said:And the rule of not cut block outside the tackles is a good one. If you have a player running at full speed which is much more likely to happen outside the tackles and you go for the knees like that then injuries would be rampant.
And he did jump, but at the same time Gurode was snapping the ball.Doomsday101;1207997 said:TO said after the game he jumped. He said the guy covering him caused him to flinch.