Dak_Attack_09
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,222
- Reaction score
- 3,603
He’s played 2 games. Opponent Rush yards = 459.
not all on him obviously, but not making a difference
It’s Quinn’s b.s. playing DEs at DTs and constantly doing stunts.
He’s played 2 games. Opponent Rush yards = 459.
not all on him obviously, but not making a difference
I literally have no idea what that combination of words you put together is supposed to mean.the entire thread, yup it to every one of you that believe the middle of the DL was the issue the last 2 weeks.
I called out against cutting young buck John Ridgeway, and now we see why. Dan Quinn is fully responsible for that decision just like he is fully responsible for this Defense having given up at least 130+ yards rushing the last 4 games straight. That's not including today's horrible performance both against the run and the pass. Dan Quinn isn't looking so hot now. Guess we know why Atlanta fired him.What are people thinking about Old Man Hankins? Are we still thinking it was an impact signing? Hopes were very high around here when we signed him. How are people feeling?
True, but rewatch some tape and notice the horrible Dline stunt calls that automatically are helping opposing Olines to easily open up gaping holes.I think a big problem with our run game is our LBs. They get washed out on stretches and pitches to the outside. They can't shed blockers to save their life.
Some of us have been calling for Suh to be signed for over a month now. Weird decisions by this team not to bring Suh in for a workout.Need to sign Suh.
Might be right but I'd like to see our stats when it comes to avg yardage given up on inside vs outside runs.True, but rewatch some tape and notice the horrible Dline stunt calls that automatically are helping opposing Olines to easily open up gaping holes.
The inside runs average given up by our D definitely has to be bad.Might be right but I'd like to see our stats when it comes to avg yardage given up on inside vs outside runs.
Ah, so sign the really old guy who has been notorious for only playing the run when he wants to and was horrible vs the run last season, to fix the run defense when the LB is the major issue??? Brilliant!!! Lol!Need to sign Suh.
Ah, so sign the really old guy who has been notorious for only playing the run when he wants to and was horrible vs the run last season, to fix the run defense when the LB is the major issue??? Brilliant!!! Lol!
Superbowl!!!!!What are people thinking about Old Man Hankins? Are we still thinking it was an impact signing? Hopes were very high around here when we signed him. How are people feeling?
Lol! Reread previous statement, read it slowly. Then consider why he’s sitting on the couch 9 weeks into the season. If you concentrate and think really really hard while contemplating it might come to you!No LB can be successful if the DL isn’t doing it’s job and they had top run defense when Suh was with them.
GO AWAY then. Stop replying.I literally have no idea what that combination of words you put together is supposed to mean.