gimmesix;3761696 said:... it makes it less likely that Dallas will retain Pasqualoni as defensive coordinator, no matter what happens with the head coaching position.
gimmesix;3761696 said:... it makes it less likely that Dallas will retain Pasqualoni as defensive coordinator, no matter what happens with the head coaching position.
MegaMagick;3761720 said:He was never going to stay on as DC.
DragonCowboy;3761733 said:The defense gave up 13 points. The offense gave up 14. I agree that I don't want Pasqualoni, but is that the only thing we should like about the loss? Perhaps our offensive coordinator isn't the best man for the job, and we'll get a chance to explore that better than we otherwise would have?
DragonCowboy;3761733 said:The defense gave up 13 points. The offense gave up 14. I agree that I don't want Pasqualoni, but is that the only thing we should like about the loss? Perhaps our offensive coordinator isn't the best man for the job, and we'll get a chance to explore that better than we otherwise would have?
DragonCowboy;3761733 said:The defense gave up 13 points. The offense gave up 14. I agree that I don't want Pasqualoni, but is that the only thing we should like about the loss? Perhaps our offensive coordinator isn't the best man for the job, and we'll get a chance to explore that better than we otherwise would have?
windward;3761750 said:Are you suggesting Garrett was responsible for the pick sixes? Really?
DragonCowboy;3761733 said:The defense gave up 13 points. The offense gave up 14. I agree that I don't want Pasqualoni, but is that the only thing we should like about the loss? Perhaps our offensive coordinator isn't the best man for the job, and we'll get a chance to explore that better than we otherwise would have?
Woods;3761754 said:The defense folded yet again. Same way with Colts, NO, Philly, etc., etc., etc.
The offense while not perfect, still put up over 25 pts with a 2nd and 3rd string QB playing.
This defense needs a complete retooling.
gimmesix;3761757 said:That's a different can of worms.
I do think the offense has shown it can move under Garrett, but the defense has been porous under Pasqualoni. I don't want any doubt to enter the equation on whether he stays as DC. Giving up a game-winning drive to the Arizona Cardinals should keep that from happening.
bruce122767;3761732 said:I think Pasqualoni was done long before this game, as are the entire defensive staff.
hutch1254;3761772 said:The OC got a 3rd stringer to execute a TD drive. The DC could not get the defense to execute a stop on "the person that scared Paul Pasqualoni the most" Larry Fitzgerald. 4th and 15, the whole stadium and national TV know its going to him. No body on him at the LOS.
Yes the offense gave up 14 pts. But they still executed a TD, the D couldn't execute a stop when it was needed the most.

parcells316;3761758 said:Paul Pasqualoni is no defensive guru but I love the threads that rip him apart when the defense has been dog dung all year. When exactly is it on the players? This defense, particularly the secondary has been swiss cheese all year. wade sucked, Pasqualoni sucked, we'll just bring in a hot shot DC and all the players will play well correct?
parcells316;3761758 said:Paul Pasqualoni is no defensive guru but I love the threads that rip him apart when the defense has been dog dung all year. When exactly is it on the players? This defense, particularly the secondary has been swiss cheese all year. wade sucked, Pasqualoni sucked, we'll just bring in a hot shot DC and all the players will play well correct?
