What I think will happen 53

[blindzebra]

This is not what I want them to do, but what I think is going to happen.

QB: Romo, Weeden


RB: Murray, Dunbar, Randle, Williams


TE: Witten, Escobar, Hanna


WR: Bryant, Williams, Beasley, Harris, Street, Newsome


OT: Smith, Free, Wetzel


OG: Leary, Martin, Bernadeau


C: Frederick


Offense: 22


DE: Selvie, Crawford, Mincey, Spencer, Lawrence, Wilson


DT: Melton, McClain, Coleman, Bishop, Hayden


SLB: Wilber, Lawrence


MLB: McClain, Hitchens


WLB Durant, Carter


CB: Carr, Claiborne, Green, Mitchell, Patmon, Scandrick


S: Church, Wilcox, Heath, Dixon, Hamilton


Defense: 28


K: Bailey


P: Jones


LS Ladouceur


ST: 3


Practice Squad:


Vaughn


Boyd


Copeland


Aladenoye


Bush


Najvar


W.Smith


Tribue


K. Smith


Patrick

We will not assign IR return to Lawrence, or put Spencer on PUP. Because of this and Scandrick's suspension we go light on OL, no FB and carry extra on defense.

 

[casmith07]

I think we keep one less WR or one less CB and Vaughn makes the 53 to keep him away from vultures. The league is QB poor and other veterans are starting to age.

 

[CCBoy]

I agree with casmith07, and would add one more offensive tackle. With an injury, one still needs a swing backup.

 

[xwalker]

This is not what I want them to do, but what I think is going to happen.

QB: Romo, Weeden


RB: Murray, Dunbar, Randle, Williams


TE: Witten, Escobar, Hanna


WR: Bryant, Williams, Beasley, Harris, Street, Newsome


OT: Smith, Free, Wetzel


OG: Leary, Martin, Bernadeau


C: Frederick


Offense: 22


DE: Selvie, Crawford, Mincey, Spencer, Lawrence, Wilson


DT: Melton, McClain, Coleman, Bishop, Hayden


SLB: Wilber, Lawrence


MLB: McClain, Hitchens


WLB Durant, Carter


CB: Carr, Claiborne, Green, Mitchell, Patmon, Scandrick


S: Church, Wilcox, Heath, Dixon, Hamilton


Defense: 28


K: Bailey


P: Jones


LS Ladouceur


ST: 3


Practice Squad:


Vaughn


Boyd


Copeland


Aladenoye


Bush


Najvar


W.Smith


Tribue


K. Smith


Patrick

We will not assign IR return to Lawrence, or put Spencer on PUP. Because of this and Scandrick's suspension we go light on OL, no FB and carry extra on defense.

Scandrick does not count against the 53 while suspended.

You don't have a backup LT on your roster.

They normally have more WRs on the practice squad for practice purposes.

They've never gone that short on OL. You only have 7 OL.

 

[RGKnee]

No Minter??

 

[kiheikiwi]

Think also we will have some players on IR and/or PUP. Namely Whaley, Okoye and possibly Spencer. And I think Coleman makes the 53.

 

[xwalker]

Think also we will have some players on IR and/or PUP. Namely Whaley, Okoye and possibly Spencer. And I think Coleman makes the 53.

He has Coleman the DT on the roster. Are you referring to Copeland the FB?

 

[CCBoy]

I would put Copeland on the practice squad in case it was later felt a need to activate a fullback.

 

[kiheikiwi]

Yep sorry, meant the FB. And I see he has him there.

 

[reddyuta]

I dont know about 7 linemen,that seems way too low.I think they may keep Parnell and Patrick has an outside chance if he plays well in the next 2 games.

 

[conner01]

Scandrick does not count against the 53 while suspended.

You don't have a backup LT on your roster.

They normally have more WRs on the practice squad for practice purposes.

They've never gone that short on OL. You only have 7 OL.

i agree parnell will stick because he is the only lt. as for ps guys because we get to carry extra guys for scandrick and maybe lawrence and spencer those guys may be easier to get to the ps because rosters will be set and if someone signs them they have to cut someone so maybe a guy like boyd actually gets to the ps

 

[Wolfpack]

Light on the OL and light on LBers.

 

[TwoCentPlain]

7 OL? Yeah, like that is going to happen. That would be insane. Please tell me, that the Cowboys would not even think about going with only 7 OL. Has an NFL team ever tried to go with just 7 OL on the 53 man roster?

 

[CT Dal Fan]

I'm predicting a trade for a defensive end. Maybe Bruce Carter and a conditional pick to Seattle for Bruce Irvin. Irvin had like 10 sacks as a rookie, got hurt last year, and Seattle won the Super Bowl without him. Maybe they'd listen to an offer.

 

[Alexander]

Maybe Bruce Carter and a conditional pick to Seattle for Bruce Irvin.

So why would Seattle want to do this?

 

[ScipioCowboy]

So why would Seattle want to do this?

They're both named Bruce. Why so picky?

 

[CT Dal Fan]

So why would Seattle want to do this?

To get a draft pick for a player they really don't need. I threw Carter in to sweeten the pot.

 

[XDez88BeastX]

To get a draft pick for a player they really don't need. I threw Carter in to sweeten the pot.

What round pick are we giving? I wouldn't want to give anything more than a 4th & irvin was their first round pick just a couple of years ago. I just couldn't see something like this happening. IMO

 

[Alexander]

To get a draft pick for a player they really don't need. I threw Carter in to sweeten the pot.

So they would trade Irvin, a player they need as a Leo, for Carter and a "conditional pick". Nevermind that Carter would have a tough time finding much of any role in that LB corps. Great idea.

 

[CCBoy]

So they would trade Irvin, a player they need as a Leo, for Carter and a "conditional pick". Nevermind that Carter would have a tough time finding much of any role in that LB corps. Great idea.

It was good enough for discussion although...