One of the major strikes against Vinnie finding a job today is that at age 41, 42 or whatever he is everyone knows there is no future with him. He probably is better than SOME QB's currently on NFL rosters but the thinking is that they will get better with time & experience while Vinnie will decline because of his age.
That, to me, is the major leg up that Bledsoe has on VT. Bledsoe COULD be a 2-3 yr bridge depending on when we find his successor and when they're ready. What are the odds that VT will be a player NEXT year?
Honestly, I would probably be more confident in THIS year's offense if VT were the starter. VT, IMO, was asked to do more in 2004 than Bledsoe will be asked to do in 2005. BP opened up the passing game last year with VT, and admittedly took more gambles. While ultimately the team failed miserably and VT contributed lots of TO's I'm not sure that VT couldn't actually drive the bus better in 2005 than Bledsoe.
I clearly see VT's shortcomings. He really forced some things last year and his history is that he IS prone to poor decisions and resulting mistakes. But that was magnified last year because a) we had no run game til JJ showed up, b) our WR corp was really short-handed once Glenn went down c) our defense couldn't stop anyone which resultingly made us play "let's outscore them" with VT as a key cog. Now Bledsoe arrives and is being asked to not make mistakes because we have Julius and we now have a defense. That's the assumption anyway.
I'm pretty skeptical of Bledsoe and not as down on VT as many. Neither, IMO, are close to what I would prefer we have at QB. But those guys are not easy to find or develop in the case of a youngster.