RainMan
Makin' It Rain
- Messages
- 3,125
- Reaction score
- 0
There are a lot of things we're doing right right now. We have one of the best quarterbacks, one of the best wide receivers, one of the best cornerbacks, one of ... you get the idea. TE, OLB (two of them), nose tackle can be added to this list, and even Felix might be one day.
But what makes us different? My two cents? I think we're morphing into a mix of a Baltimore and Indy/Arizona/New Orleans/Minnesota/any other passing team.
By that I mean this. Listening to an analyst earlier, he said Baltimore likes to make a game of football a boxing match. Even offensively, I think we're becoming this with our offensive line play. Certainly defensively we are. Rewatching last night's game, I'm amazed by our physicality. From Hamlin delivering kill shots (twice penalized) to what Ware, Ratliff and Spencer do, to Jenkins locking down on his man. I think if given the choice, Philly would have liked to have walked out of that stadium midway through the second quarter. Their nose was bloodied (thank you, Brooking) and they were tired of getting their tail kicked. We didn't just beat them -- we hurt them.
So why are we unique? First off, I think few teams can claim they own that mentality. But even fewer teams can claim that mentality when their offense is, in theory, a finesse-based, passing attack.
Think about it. We love draws, we have a speedster at running back, and we love to throw the rock offensively. I'm not sure the Phillys, Arizonas, etc. -- pure finesse teams -- have any element of physicality to balance out their attack. I think it's the inherrent flaw with being a passing-based team. But we buck the trend, and we do it on both sides of the ball.
I'm curious to see how physical Minnesota's defense is. On paper, their defense looks tough. We'll see if it's like ours.
Just an observation -- perhaps not a new one -- from rewatching last night's game. We really demoralized Philly, and I think it's all about our physicality. Soft we are not.
But what makes us different? My two cents? I think we're morphing into a mix of a Baltimore and Indy/Arizona/New Orleans/Minnesota/any other passing team.
By that I mean this. Listening to an analyst earlier, he said Baltimore likes to make a game of football a boxing match. Even offensively, I think we're becoming this with our offensive line play. Certainly defensively we are. Rewatching last night's game, I'm amazed by our physicality. From Hamlin delivering kill shots (twice penalized) to what Ware, Ratliff and Spencer do, to Jenkins locking down on his man. I think if given the choice, Philly would have liked to have walked out of that stadium midway through the second quarter. Their nose was bloodied (thank you, Brooking) and they were tired of getting their tail kicked. We didn't just beat them -- we hurt them.
So why are we unique? First off, I think few teams can claim they own that mentality. But even fewer teams can claim that mentality when their offense is, in theory, a finesse-based, passing attack.
Think about it. We love draws, we have a speedster at running back, and we love to throw the rock offensively. I'm not sure the Phillys, Arizonas, etc. -- pure finesse teams -- have any element of physicality to balance out their attack. I think it's the inherrent flaw with being a passing-based team. But we buck the trend, and we do it on both sides of the ball.
I'm curious to see how physical Minnesota's defense is. On paper, their defense looks tough. We'll see if it's like ours.
Just an observation -- perhaps not a new one -- from rewatching last night's game. We really demoralized Philly, and I think it's all about our physicality. Soft we are not.