What QB do we take?

[FLCowboyFan]

It appears that there are still quite a few QB's that are worth taking a gamble on. Who do you guys think we take? I've heard Prescott?

 

[TheCount]

Unless we get beat to the spot (again), I think it'll be Dak.

But to be honest, after the first round, there rest of these guys are suspect and wouldn't be trusted on the field anytime soon.

Might as well wait till next year.

 

[Idgit]

I think Prescott. Any time after 101 and it's ok by me. We do need to add a QB somewhere if there's one we like there.

 

[dbonham]

Heard from some rando on the internet who said he went to HS with Dak and he cheated on remedial math...

 

[CATCH17]

It appears that there are still quite a few QB's that are worth taking a gamble on. Who do you guys think we take? I've heard Prescott?

Hopefully none of them..

I still think we end up with Foles somehow.

 

[Q_the_man]

We better not be depending on a 4th round QB savior. Draft Dak or Cardale and hope one improves enough to trust. We will draft a QB, I don't know who but I'm certain this will not be the future starting QB of the Cowboys unless Romo gets hurt and they become our QB ala Tom Brady style.

 

[zrinkill]

Hopefully none of them..

This ..... no reason to get a QB just to get a QB

 

[Western]

If they draft a QB, bump him up to 2nd string & let him see some playing time.
When (not if) Romo gets hurt or his play warrants a replacement, then plug in the rookie -- to see what you got.
At least then by the time the 2017 draft process begins, the team will have some idea what they have.

Just look at the Jets - they draft Petty, then the following draft, they took Hackenberg.
Patriots took Garoppolo, then they decided to take Brissett this year.
Continually 'kicking the can down the road' with regards the QB position is dangerous.

 

[The Quest for Six]

Personally, unless you feel that there's a QB available that can develop into a starting QB, then I wouldn't waste a pick on a QB at this point

 

[zrinkill]

Personally, unless you feel that there's a QB available that can develop into a starting QB, then I wouldn't waste a pick on a QB at this point

This a hundred times over .......

 

[johnnyd]

I like Brandon Allen, But hopefully not at the top of the 4th .

 

[csirl]

Hogan

 

[WillieBeamen]

I think we trade for Foles

 

[Fla Cowpoke]

I am fine with Prescott or Hogan. I could live with them passing on a QB. I would also be fine with them using their 6th in a trade for Foles obviously renegotiating his contract as part of the deal.

 

[Swagnutboyz]

They have brought Prescott in for mores visits than any other QB prospects, you can bet assure barrring availability he will be the pick at 4a or 4b I'm hoping of the latter.

 

[Mr Cowboy]

Wait until the 6thand take Cardale.......

 

[dragon_mikal]

I think we trade for Foles

That would be pretty stupid. No reason to give away assets for a backup QB. If Romo goes down for any length of time the team is doomed anyway.

 

[viman96]

I'm OK with Hogan as a QB to develop to be a longtime backup but not the eventual starter.

 

[KB1122]

There is no developing a quarterback. Quarterbacks are. Or they are not.

I wouldn't use the fourth.

 

[KJJ]

it's a complete role of the dice at this point but I would go with Connor Cook.