cowboys19;1145711 said:Would we be better with or without TO?
cause if we are the same team without him, i hope he leaves next year
SBChamps;1145746 said:I think so far we would be better off with Key than TO. I'm not saying Key is as good a WR as TO is but given the fact that Key would have already known our offense, he would have produced as much as TO without the drama.
I love me some me.jja050575;1145693 said:What was TO hollaring to Parcell's?
Cowboy4ever;1145788 said:I am not a huge TO supporter.. didn't matter to me if he came here or not.. or if he leaves tomorrow.. but if you can't see the difference between TO and Key.. you just don't know football. Key never demanded any attention,, just put a safety or corner on him and even if he did get open and catch the ball.. he wasn't going anywhere. That allows D's to roll coverage to Glenn and leave safety help in the middle on Witten. That is something they can not do with TO on the feild. D's have account for him,, which leaves witten in good match ups.. much like today.. even in dime package,, he was matched against the weakest pass defender.. and he gets the big catch to set up the FG.. that wouldn't happen with Key here..
SBChamps;1145746 said:I think so far we would be better off with Key than TO. I'm not saying Key is as good a WR as TO is but given the fact that Key would have already known our offense, he would have produced as much as TO without the drama.
SupermanXx;1145938 said:those stats are before today's game
nice try
SBChamps;1145956 said:OK. Add 7 caches and 76 more yards to TO's stats. I still think that isn't worth having TO over Key considering all the BS this team had to deal with because of TO.