What would our record be with Romo?

Staubacher

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,316
Reaction score
23,742
Initially I would have said 6-1, but honestly I think even with him in there a lot of guys are underperforming this year.

I think of the 5 losses he would have won NO, NYG and either Atlanta or Seattle (not both).

So I'm saying 5-2.

What say you?
 

Derinyar

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
959
5-2 I think is almost given. Romo is worth at least 7 over Weeden and Cassel, probably more like 10-14. I would almost guarantee the Giants, Saints and Seahawks games. The Falcons game I think we win if the offense can sustain some drives in the second half. The Patriots game is sticky because maybe the pats start calling pick plays every down if Romo is in there from the start.

So 5-2 I'd be willing to put money on. 6-1 is what I think it would likely be. 7-0 isn't outside the realm of possibility.
 

Ultra Warrior

6 Million Light-years beyond believability.
Messages
2,753
Reaction score
1,856
Think we win them all, cept maybe the Pats game. Granted, we weren't exactly lighting world on fire in our first 2 games, I think we'd adjust & improve.
 

ilykdrama

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,474
Reaction score
1,100
Absolutely no less than 6-1. We'd finish 13-3 or 14-2 with this defense. Just wasn't mean to be this year.
 

loublue22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,866
Reaction score
11,141
maybe 6-1 given Dez's injury

we're undefeated with both, they worked out the kinks after week 1 and were dominant against Philly before Tony went down. Healthy we're the best team in the league.
 

rockj7

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,468
Reaction score
2,197
7-0 We where down I believe 10-6 at the half against the Pats give this defense a real offense we win that game 35-23
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
5-2 I think is almost given. Romo is worth at least 7 over Weeden and Cassel, probably more like 10-14. I would almost guarantee the Giants, Saints and Seahawks games. The Falcons game I think we win if the offense can sustain some drives in the second half. The Patriots game is sticky because maybe the pats start calling pick plays every down if Romo is in there from the start.

So 5-2 I'd be willing to put money on. 6-1 is what I think it would likely be. 7-0 isn't outside the realm of possibility.

Yup

4-3 ar the worst
 

cowboyuptx

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
617
Initially I would have said 6-1, but honestly I think even with him in there a lot of guys are underperforming this year.

I think of the 5 losses he would have won NO, NYG and either Atlanta or Seattle (not both).

So I'm saying 5-2.

What say you?

5-2 at worst... Which is why the season is far from over... They will regain their form with Romo, and with this defense looking this legit, almost all of our Sundays will be happy from here on out...
 

Tenkamenin

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,605
Reaction score
4,026
Absolutely no less than 6-1. We'd finish 13-3 or 14-2 with this defense. Just wasn't mean to be this year.

I would have to agree, the NFL is weak this year. No one really stands out to me aside from the Pats and I think we would've spanked them with a healthy Romo and Dez.
 
Top