summerisfunner said:
what exactly is your point again?
Did you bother reading the the first entry in the thread? It's largely a reaction to Alexander claiming that 30something DEs were better performers in their first few years than their last few. I took a look at a few older DEs and didn't see that trend. In the examples I posted they were more consistent when older.
I don't have the extensive stats to do a Bill James like analysis, so you have to take them as examples, not a proof. But since 6 of the 7 ends discussed so far follow it, I'm inclined to think it a decent enough working hypothesis.
Does it apply in all cases? Probably not, but you need to look at older defensive ends if you're going to project the career of an older defensive end. The guys that burn out at 29 really don't apply, do they?
Part of the problem with analyzing a guy like Ellis is the lack of an easily recognizable similar player. Reminds me a bit of the problems I've seen with baseball management sports games and the way they model Jose Cruz, Sr. He was in his 30s when his average stared rising. Had he not been in the Astrodome, he probably would have won some batting titles in the early 1980s. But that's not the "typical MLB player profile" so they tend to project him as worth about as much as a AAA player by 1981 or so. And the failure isn't in Jose Cruz, Sr. It's the failure of the game model to account for the history of his play.
David.