Whenever we throw it to Witten...

zagnut

New Member
Messages
1,210
Reaction score
0
Bledsoe barely acknowledging Witten was brought up maybe 3 or 4 weeks ago and all that was heard was he's on the same pace as last year. What gets me is Bledsoe always made great use of his TEs in his previous stops. Witten is just as big of a weapon as Ben Coates, but Bledsoe seems to look WR first, second and, in some cases, third.

Maybe he'll become a bigger part of the offense as the weather gets worse. TE has been underutilized. Our other TE barely has any catches. I realize he's mostly a blocker, but he has some ability as a receiver and he never saw a ball until game 5. Silly.
 

CaptainAmerica

Active Member
Messages
5,030
Reaction score
26
Yeah Qwickdraw,
Perhaps they could look for him on first or second down when they get in the red-zone instead of handing it off for a run right over the center and the guard.

That would be a novel concept wouldn't it? Perhaps someone could suggest that to the all-knowing Parcells.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
J.Jones21 said:
D Ware

19 tackles
4 sacks

goal

90 tackles
9-11 sacks

Sorry -- had to comment on this sig - that's the most absurd sig file i've ever seen. 90 tackles? What position do you think Ware is playing?
 

kiheikiwi

Maui No Ka Oi
Messages
3,530
Reaction score
2,538
On the play where Bledsoe tried to run it in, I was screaming at the TV.Lousaka Polite rolled out to the right,and as Bledsoe committed to the run, Polite just ran into the endzone,I was screaming "Block somebody!" May be picking at staws here but I thought when a play breaks down like that,arn't you supposed to come back and help? I thought if Polite had of blocked instead of watching - Bledsoe would have got into the endzone! Now, if that was a designed rollout........
 

InDakWeTrust

DezBRomo9
Messages
2,091
Reaction score
432
I am up for that campaign too. Throw it to Witten or run the friggin draw.
I like it the TITWORTFD campaign.
 

warren smith

New Member
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
IMO Witten is our Novacek and for many years to come. I guess Bledsoe gets it drummed into him that as he goes through his progressions it's Key, then Glenn, Julius and then Witten. We win at Oakland, we win in Seattle outright (No Cortez needed) if we make Witten our #1 target, as he has an incredible knack of getting open all the time. Washington game was an aberration. HEY, WE HAVE A HELL OF A TEAM, AND ALL WE NEED IS FOR THE COACHES TO GET ON BOARD AND NOT F***K THINGS UP ANYMORE.
 

4lifecowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
2,923
warren smith said:
IMO Witten is our Novacek and for many years to come. I guess Bledsoe gets it drummed into him that as he goes through his progressions it's Key, then Glenn, Julius and then Witten. We win at Oakland, we win in Seattle outright (No Cortez needed) if we make Witten our #1 target, as he has an incredible knack of getting open all the time. Washington game was an aberration. HEY, WE HAVE A HELL OF A TEAM, AND ALL WE NEED IS FOR THE COACHES TO GET ON BOARD AND NOT F***K THINGS UP ANYMORE.

Goes thru progressions? It is begining to look like he is deciding who he is gonna throw to in the huddle. On that INT he threw to close the game, Price ran an inside slant and was single covered on the same side Glenn was on. Strangely simular to that forced pass to Glenn when Witten was open in a previous game.
 
Top