Which current or former NFL player has a Super Bowl ring who doesn't deserve it?

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,687
Reaction score
33,051
Whether because they didn't play or didn't play well or you just don't think they should have one because you don't like them.

For me, Keyshawn Johnson. The guy groaned and complained his entire career, threw Wayne Cherbet under the bus and was ultra selfish, not to mention did really nothing for the Buccaneers, and he has a Super Bowl ring.

Next: Brandon Jacobs. The one reason I don't want the Giants to win is because I don't want Jacobs to get another Super Bowl ring. Other than that, it wouldn't bother me if the Giants won.
 
Clearly this is just an axe grinding thread.

Should be titled, "Who do you hate and do they have a Superbowl ring"
 
Fletch;4404859 said:
:laugh2: No doubt. Nor does Big Ben in 2006.

Ben's performance hasn't warranted either rings. He hasn't been the better QB in either game he's played in and won. He was downright putrid in one game and average, at best, in the other.
 
Robert Douglas

Appeared in one game in September as a backup fullback. Recorded no stats. Game happened to be for the least deserving championship team of all time.

Nothing against the guy personally, but...
 
Trent Dilfer

Don't hate him, but we all know it was the defense that carried that team.
 
Current: Ben Rapesherburger. A despicable human being like that should not have a ring on his finger, regardless of what he has or has not done on the field.

Former: I'm going to say the 1991 Giants. I don't think they were the best team that year and won it all by "playing not to lose."


How about vice versa? Which player does not have a ring that most deserves it?

I'll go with Jim Kelly and/or the early 90s Bills. They should have won at least one of the four they lost. (Just not against the Cowboys, of course.)
 
CowboyMike;4405199 said:
Current: Ben Rapesherburger. A despicable human being like that should not have a ring on his finger, regardless of what he has or has not done on the field.

Former: I'm going to say the 1991 Giants. I don't think they were the best team that year and won it all by "playing not to lose."


How about vice versa? Which player does not have a ring that most deserves it?

I'll go with Jim Kelly and/or the early 90s Bills. They should have won at least one of the four they lost. (Just not against the Cowboys, of course.)

Can't help but agree on the Pitt ring. Though Eli is a very close second imo.

To answer who should have one but doesn't I think Marino has to be on that list.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,371
Messages
14,533,421
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top