Which Head Coach that is available is better than Garrett right now?

[Stash]

Generalizations are the mark of someone who's been cornered.

Refusal to answe is the mark of someone who, in fact, has none.

Yep. Looks like Wade wasn't getting it done.

Yeah, "Wade's offense". Wow, the sad lengths some of you will go.

True.

Wait? Did we just agree in something?

What's not on him?

I think he served to undermine himself by absolving players of their share of blame when they obviously screwed up. Nothing is absolute either way.

The year before is irrelevant.

No, it's completely relevant however much that bothers you. It's an indicator of where the team was previously and how much talent a coach did and didn't have. You don't like it because it destroys your argument.

What did PHI do in 2016?

They went 7-9 with a completely rebuilt team. How does this compare?

You can at least cede the point that the previous 8 weeks are more relevant than the previous year, right?

Sure. As you can certainly cede than the prior years record is, in fact also, relevant.

Burn? You're projecting.

No, just calling out a weak retort when I see one.

 

[Stash]

whaaattt.

you claim conspiracy...that garrett held the offense back and when he got the HC position, he scored more.

ok...hmmm,

so how come the defense played better? wasn't wade the coach for the first 8 games...he had control of the defense...why did the defense suck?


not too hard to follow or are you just playing coy?

Do me a favor, you answer the questions about your hypocrisy pointed out to you and then I'll answer your questions again.

 

[Stash]

hmm, shouldn't you be asking yourself that question?

Check yourself before trying to call out anyone else.

Again, self awareness isn't your strong suit.

 

[Stash]

yes offense averaged less. so did the defense...over the 8 games.....but I am sure you have your agenda reasoning to excuse that and blame garrett some how.

seriously you lost any and all credibility when you went the conspiracy angle....childish....and perhaps a little too much netflix

I did? Who consigned on incorrect "facts" about a 5-game average?

Again, check yourself.

 

[zerofill]

Every High School coach.

 

[Stash]

Do you think Garrett expected to score 9 more points with Kitna than Romo? Did he see the future?

Go back and get your math straight and then you can join in the adults conversation.

 

[Haimerej]

What’s funny and kills his theory is that Wade’s defense sucked the first 8 games, the unit he coached. It actually played better in the second half of the season under Paul Pasqualoni.

I just don't get why he insists Garrett inherited a playoff team.

Refusal to answe is the mark of someone who, in fact, has none.

Your inability to comprehend isn't my refusal.

Yeah, "Wade's offense". Wow, the sad lengths some of you will go.

"Wade's team."

Wait? Did we just agree in something?

Partially.

I think he served to undermine himself by absolving players of their share of blame when they obviously screwed up. Nothing is absolute either way.

Garrett? I was asking about Garrett.

No, it's completely relevant however much that bothers you. It's an indicator of where the team was previously and how much talent a coach did and didn't have. You don't like it because it destroys your argument.

My argument has been he took over a 1-7 team, not a playoff team. You omitted that part, which you're about to agree is more relevant.

They went 7-9 with a completely rebuilt team. How does this compare?

It compares in that the previous year is meaningless. You going to pick a 7-9 team to win it all this year?

Sure. As you can certainly cede than the prior years record is, in fact also, relevant.

Relevant only in a trivial sense. Irrelevant in so far as what Garrett actually took over.

No, just calling out a weak retort when I see one.

You appear to be unnecessarily combative.

 

[Dre11]

Go back and get your math straight and then you can join in the adults conversation.

You claimed 9 more points, now you can’t keep your post right, some adult

 

[Dre11]

I did? Who consigned on incorrect "facts" about a 5-game average?

Again, check yourself.

The scores are facts, go do your homework

https://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/dallas-cowboys/results/2010

 

[zerofill]

Cowboys have sucked ever since the CAP was implemented... Sucked under Parcells, Sucked under Wade, sucked under Garrett.

The Dallas Cowboys, of all teams in the NFL, should not have a 23 year SB drought.

So they have all sucked...

Jerry's management of players has sucked.

His business acumen as far as promotion of the franchise is A+++ though.

What NFL team could go 23 years without an appearance in the SB and still be the most valuable franchise? So I have to give him
a high grade on that one.

 

[Stash]

I just don't get why he insists Garrett inherited a playoff team.

Because he did. Damn facts!

Your inability to comprehend isn't my refusal.

Nothing to "comprehend" when it's clear you're simply dodging the question. You're not fooling anyone here.

"Wade's team."

Garrett's half.

Partially.



Garrett? I was asking about Garrett.

What was your question?

My argument has been he took over a 1-7 team, not a playoff team. You omitted that part, which you're about to agree is more relevant.

A 1-7 team that was a playoff team the year before, was it not? I know you'd like to separate the two, but that's not how facts and reality work. It's tough that way. I know you'd love to be selective and simply pick what you want off the shelf but life doesn't work that way.

It compares in that the previous year is meaningless. You going to pick a 7-9 team to win it all this year?

No, it doesn't "compare", no matter how much you wish it did. Again, they were a complete rebuild. Garrett's inherited wasn't at all. Fail.

Relevant only in a trivial sense. Irrelevant in so far as what Garrett actually took over.

Bull****. Throw a tantrum. Reality disagrees with your opinions. Deal with that. It's relevant all day every day.

You appear to be unnecessarily combative.

No more so than the person I'm arguing with.

 

[Idgit]

Cowboys have sucked ever since the CAP was implemented... Sucked under Parcells, Sucked under Wade, sucked under Garrett.

The Dallas Cowboys, of all teams in the NFL, should not have a 23 year SB drought.

So they have all sucked...

Jerry's management of players has sucked.

His business acumen as far as promotion of the franchise is A+++ though.

What NFL team could go 23 years without an appearance in the SB and still be the most valuable franchise? So I have to give him
a high grade on that one.

At some point, you have to look at the long draught, under so many different coaches, and wonder if the issue might actually be something more fundamental than who the HC is, right? You'd think so, anyway.

 

[Stash]

The scores are facts, go do your homework

https://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/dallas-cowboys/results/2010

You first, 5 does not equal 8.

 

[Dre11]

You first, 5 does not equal 8.

I didn’t need 8 to prove your theory is bull****, why would Garrett “let” his offense score 27,27,20,21,35 points in 5 of Wade’s 8 games if he was sabotaging him? Can’t answer it can you?

 

[Haimerej]

Because he did. Damn facts!

1-7

Nothing to "comprehend" when it's clear you're simply dodging the question. You're not fooling anyone here.

I certainly haven't tried. You really don't see that calling your argument an appeal to popularity doesn't carry with it the acknowledgment of your point?

Garrett's half.

Hindered by Wade's.

What was your question?

Now I have to do your homework in my conversation with you? Not happening.

A 1-7 team that was a playoff team the year before, was it not? I know you'd like to separate the two, but that's not how facts and reality work. It's tough that way. I know you'd love to be selective and simply pick what you want off the shelf but life doesn't work that way.

How does life work?

No, it doesn't "compare", no matter how much you wish it did. Again, they were a complete rebuild. Garrett's inherited wasn't at all. Fail.

It's like you're wearing blinders. The point was the previous season isn't an indication of the next. It wasn't a comparison of the '09-'10 Cowboys with the '16-'17 Eagles. You're chasing whatever squirrel you can to avoid my simple point.

Bull****. Throw a tantrum. Reality disagrees with your opinions. Deal with that. It's relevant all day every day.

Throw a tantrum? Dude... you're really projecting here. I like how you're now the arbiter of reality. On a lighter note, are you a card dealer by trade? Run an auto dealership?

No more so than the person I'm arguing with.

You keep saying, "deal with it," and looking for, "sick burns," and expecting tantrums. I'm just trying to get you to acknowledge Garrett's inherited team was far removed from being a playoff team. Not sure why you seem to be taking it as a personal affront. But hey, I'm bored today.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Do me a favor, you answer the questions about your hypocrisy pointed out to you and then I'll answer your questions again.

refusing to answer...hmmmm getting defensive.

 

[Stash]

I didn’t need 8 to prove your theory is bull****, why would Garrett “let” his offense score 27,27,20,21,35 points in 5 of Wade’s 8 games if he was sabotaging him? Can’t answer it can you?

Don think need to. The "average" is the 8 games that Wade coached. All of them. Not some selective nonsense you'd like to spout.

You're awful at this.

 

[Stash]

refusing to answer...hmmmm getting defensive.

Just like I thought. You're exposed.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

I did? Who consigned on incorrect "facts" about a 5-game average?

Again, check yourself.

? you are confusing me with another poster...

I stated FACTS. undeniable FACTS. the defense was better in the last 8 games compared to the first 8 games when Wade was still headcoach..

not sure what you are referencing here with the 5 games...but put the drinks down, you have had enough

 

[Cowboysheelsreds053]

Just name one.