SilverStarCowboy
The Actualist
- Messages
- 10,337
- Reaction score
- 1,998
Philly
Carolina
Atlanta
In that order
Carolina
Atlanta
In that order
blindzebra said:I did.
Edge + two great young WRs and the 2nd best defense in their division. They are an improved OL away from being a playoff contender.
SilverStarCowboy said:Philly
Carolina
Atlanta
In that order
blindzebra said:I did.
Edge + two great young WRs and the 2nd best defense in their division. They are an improved OL away from being a playoff contender.
Justis said:I don't think there is a team in the league that is definatly better than us. We have the best recieving core in the division. A top notch D-line. A decent RB core. A LBing core 1 pick away from being the best in the league. The best defensive backfield in the league. A good Quarterback, and a franchise tight end. My only doubts are on the Oline. Kosier is a question mark. But with Fabini I know for a fact that it will at least be better than last year. Which to be fair, until Flozell was injured, wasn't terrible.
RiggoForever said:Don't forget Washington
dwmyers said:Until the first spring training game, none of them are better than us. Afterwards? We'll see.
JMO, but we have some depth issues at NT..
David.
SouthernStar said:"on paper" doesn't mean a thing to me. So (going by last year's actual performance):
Giants
Washington
Chicago
Tampa Bay
Carolina
Seattle
summerisfunner said:if depth at NT is an issue, I say we're in pretty good shape lol
that's not the only issue though, FS and OLB are big issues
Woods said:Firstly, I'd say no team in the NFC is head and shoulders better than us.
In terms of better on paper right now, I'd say
Seattle - Better OL, more solid at RB (proven runner, that is), Hasselback seems to have really matured. (That said, I think our starting WRs and TE is better.)
Carolina - maybe. But I think we're roughly equal right now.
I consider the NFC East teams more or less equal - all within 1-2 games of each other.
Who else would you add to the list?