Which WR group is better?

Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Rack said:
By far.


I see we've already had 2 homer Commanders fans post their vote. :rolleyes:

I'm the third. :D

But in all honestly, depends on the QB , the RB and the O-Line, in other words, the offense as a whole needs to gel correctly. Hell, look at Detroit's WR/TE group, if you go by that, they should be dominating.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
dreamshatterer said:
I'm the third. :D

But in all honestly, depends on the QB , the RB and the O-Line, in other words, the offense as a whole needs to gel correctly. Hell, look at Detroit's WR/TE group, if you go by that, they should be dominating.



Like I pointed out above, assume YOu are the QB. Assume the OLs, Coaches, everything BUT the WRs are exactly the same.

Which Group is better?
 

whcarm

Member
Messages
482
Reaction score
0
dreamshatterer said:
I'm the third. :D

But in all honestly, depends on the QB , the RB and the O-Line, in other words, the offense as a whole needs to gel correctly. Hell, look at Detroit's WR/TE group, if you go by that, they should be dominating.

Why would Detroit's be dominating under any circumstances?

They have an old, washed up TE, an injury prone bust, a rookie WR that some didn't believe would ever be that good in the NFL and a final decent player that is way overhyped.

Just because they were big names coming out of the draft doesn't mean they were, are or ever should be good players in the NFL.
 
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Rack said:
Like I pointed out above, assume YOu are the QB. Assume the OLs, Coaches, everything BUT the WRs are exactly the same.

Which Group is better?

My bad on not reading that post. Glenn, Owens, and Witten have produced over a few years now. So the the obvious pick would be them.
 

Dave_in-NC

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,049
Reaction score
5,132
Rack said:
:rolleyes:

Let's assume YOU are the QB, ok?


Now, without having ANY knowledge of ANY off the field issues for ANY of these players, just going by the TALENT alone, which group would you prefer?

It's not rocket science, People.

Well I always played Ice hockey. So being the QB for the cowboys with them Wrs I would say we would be worst off. :D

Dont ake me answer, I hates TO.:laugh2:
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
leonargized said:
I think after the Colts , Dallas may be the best in the league and definetly best in the division

Don't easily presume the Colts are nearly as good as they were last year. Losing Edge is going to hurt them... quite a bit.

Rhodes had 1104 yards in his rookie year in 2001, when James was injured, and since hasn't done more than 254 yards in a year. And last year averaged 3.0 yards per gain.

Edge is a 1500+ yard runner in comparisson. There is going to be a huge drop off in their running game.

The Colts are overrated, and the only reason they came CLOSE to a perfect season, was because their schedule was so weak. And their division is so weak. You had two of the worst teams in the nfl in one division. Hopefully the jaguars win the division next year.Too bad their overrated too.

The AFC itself is overrated, and is on a complete downward spiral.

Look at the AFC East
Patriots - suck
dolphins - decent, pretty good with culpepper
buffalo - sucks
jets - suck

Dolphins will win that division next year.

the afc north will be the afc powerhouse division. but baltimore will still suck.

denver is the best team in the afc, and san diego, and kansas city are both going to suck next year. less so for kansas city, more so for san diego. oakland is also going to suck.

Compared to the up and coming teams in the nfc...

dallas cowboys, new york giants, washington Commanders *until the implode*, chicago bears, tampa bay buccaneers, seattle seahawks, carolina panthers, atlanta falcons, new orleans (maybe in a year or two) , arizona cardinals... san fransisco in two years...

the nfc is full of growing talent now.
 
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
whcarm said:
Why would Detroit's be dominating under any circumstances?

They have an old, washed up TE, an injury prone bust, a rookie WR that some didn't believe would ever be that good in the NFL and a final decent player that is way overhyped.

Just because they were big names coming out of the draft doesn't mean they were, are or ever should be good players in the NFL.

I am not going to argue that Detroit would dominate in anything cause they just suck. But they do have talented WR's which nobody can deny which I thought was the original question. Sorry, damn! :D
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Galian Beast,

I don't know where to start with that post. Suffice to say that I disagree with most of it.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
you can disagree with whatever you want, thats your right...doesn't make you right tho... =/
 
Top