Who’s your pick in this scenario?

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,272
Reaction score
9,325
In no particular order these are the 1st 9 players off the board

Lawrence
Wilson
Fields
Lance
Chase
Waddle
Pitts
Sewell
Surtain

Trade back isn’t an option
 
Not a super big fan of Parsons, think the value in Horn is lower in the round, too early for Moehrig, Barmore, Ojulari, Collins. No need for JOK with Neal in that role. Farley has a back thing...

Only player worth it, to me, is Slater.
 
Worst case scenario right there one of

Horn
Slater
Parsons

Torn right now, Parsons is the best player
 
In no particular order these are the 1st 9 players off the board

Lawrence
Wilson
Fields
Lance
Chase
Waddle
Pitts
Sewell
Surtain

Trade back isn’t an option

Im a big Farley guy but the recent surgery news scares me.

If the off the field checks out, I’d take Parsons. Class is loaded at OT so feel good about there being an option in rounds 2/3 if we want one.
 
1. Trade down is always an option. I might not get as much as I want. That would be my first option

2. At this point we are involved in group think. The players you have in your head as the next 3-4 players are based on media projections. We have no idea where our scouts have players ranked. If my scouts tell me Barmore or Moehrig are in the same tier to Slater I’ll take one of them
 
First off your top 10 breaks my heart.
No one that I would hope dropped to 10 did.

I must go Slater.
 
Slater is BPA to me there. Groom him at LG and then T if Collins or Smith get injured again
 
In no particular order these are the 1st 9 players off the board

Lawrence
Wilson
Fields
Lance
Chase
Waddle
Pitts
Sewell
Surtain

Trade back isn’t an option
Smart money BPA is Slater; however, this team has to address the D and they have OL.

Farley or Horn. If his back is OK, Farley.

And that could very well be the first 9 off the board.
 
Not a super big fan of Parsons, think the value in Horn is lower in the round, too early for Moehrig, Barmore, Ojulari, Collins. No need for JOK with Neal in that role. Farley has a back thing...

Only player worth it, to me, is Slater.

Neal is on a one year deal. I don't think he'd be a factor in whether to take JOK or not. That being said, 10 seems early for him.

Slater seems like the logical answer to this question with Farley now having some back issues. But Slater at 10 sucks.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,968
Messages
13,907,762
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top