Who can hang with Pats? Pick the Pack

Gryphon

Merge Ahead
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
31
Who can hang with Pats? Pick the Pack
Nov. 22, 2007
By Pete Prisco
CBSSports.com Senior Writer
http://cbs.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10490465/rss

DETROIT -- Aaron Kampman, the Green Bay Packers' all-everything defensive end, was asked late Thursday afternoon if he thought his team could match up with the New England Patriots, the team that many are saying is unbeatable.
Fresh off their impressive 37-26 dismantling of the Detroit Lions at Ford Field, which wasn't that close, it was a logical question to ask any of the Packers in their celebratory locker room.

"That's not for me to decide," Kampman said. "That's for the prognosticators and people like that to decide."
So here I go: The 10-1 Packers are the team that has the best ability to match up with the Patriots in the entire league. Yes, better than the Dallas Cowboys, who Green Bay will play next week for NFC supremacy, and better than any other team in the AFC, including the injury-depleted Indianapolis Colts.

The main reason is Brett Favre, but there are many others, which we will detail. Favre, the ageless one, showed his right arm off again against the Lions, looking every bit as good as he did when he was a three-time MVP award winner.
Favre completed 31 of 41 passes for 381 yards and three touchdowns. During one stretch, he completed a team-record 20 consecutive passes and even the incompletion to break that streak was caught, but receiver Koren Robinson was ruled out of bounds. "When his game elevates, it's scary," Packers receiver Greg Jennings said.

Playing in a spread formation most of the afternoon, and taking snaps out of the shotgun, Favre played pitch-and-catch with the Lions defense. He threw on 31 of the Packers' first 34 snaps as they decided to take advantage of the Lions secondary. It was really this simple: Ball snapped, quick look, ball out, receivers run.
It was also a treat to watch, better than winning the wishbone break from the Thanksgiving Day turkey.
"It's been very good for us," Favre said of the spread offense.
That style of offense run by Favre is like watching an ace surgeon with a scalpel, the precision of it all being what transfixes you.

Farve threw to eight different receivers, many times making short throws that turned into good plays with their run-after-the-catch ability. Donald Driver led all receivers with 10 catches for 147 yards. He has been with Favre since 1999, longer than any of the other receivers, so when he talks about his quarterback it means something.
"When I came in 1999 he was playing the same way he is now," Driver said.
And to think it almost didn't happen, that we would be missing this. Favre considered retiring after last year, but decided to come back for this season -- and now there is talk of maybe even more. Why not?
He's playing at a high level and he's truly enjoying himself. You can see it in the way he smiles during games and you can feel it when he talks about this team.

"I consider us lucky, pretty good and unknown," Favre said. "The different scenarios that we've had to use to win games makes you think this team may be pretty good."
Wrong. They are very good. The Packers have averaged 33 points a game in their past four, so they can score enough to stay with the Patriots. That will be the key to playing with them or beating them since they will get theirs. Even when it goes slow like it did against the Lions at the start -- they fumbled their first offensive play -- they're good enough to overcome it.

The doubters will say the Packers, who are dead last in the league in rushing, don't run the ball well enough to win in the postseason. But they brush off that notion, and they should. Their short passing game is their running offense. We saw a lot of that against the Lions.
It is somewhat eye opening to look at the stat sheet at halftime and see they had four runs and finished with 17 for the game.

"It doesn't matter what we do as long as we score and we were scoring," running back Ryan Grant said of his inactivity. "That's all that matters. We can run it when we have to."
They did late. Grant finished with 101 yards on 15 carries, including 48 yards on Green Bay's final drive to get a game-clinching field goal with 1:44 left. Favre admitted after the game that the Packers will need to be a little more balanced, but if they play the Patriots down the road it won't matter.
We might have football heaven: Two teams that won't hand off.
In addition to their ability to score, the Packers have several other things that make them the best threat to the Patriots -- if they get there.

One is Kampman and his fellow defensive linemen. The Packers are 10 deep up front, with Kampman being the best of the group. He's on his way to the Pro Bowl and had two sacks against the Lions to give him 11 for the season.
The two-sack total doesn't do him justice. Kampman was in the Lions backfield all day long, dominating backup tackle Blaine Saipaia to the point where Kampman could have been arrested for that type of abuse. When he bull-rushed him on one pass play, knocking him to the ground, it was a sad thing to watch.
"Pretty good day," Kampman said.

Eventually the Lions wised up and started helping Saipaia with a back to stop the abuse. But by then Jon Kitna's feet were happier than a fat kid sitting at the Thanksgiving Day table.

The other thing that makes the Packers a good matchup for the Pats if they do meet is that they have quality cover people. Charles Woodson and Al Harris are the best corners in the league.
But even when Woodson left in the second quarter with a toe injury, the youngsters who took over, guys like Frank Walker, Jarrett Bush and Tramon Williams, played well. Bush is the team's nickel corner, but he might be forced to start next Thursday's big game with the Cowboys at Texas Stadium. Woodson's toe could keep the best corner in the league out.
That game will likely decide who has the home-field advantage in the NFC playoffs.
Even if the Packers lose that game, I still think they are the best matchup for the Patriots because they have better cover people than the Cowboys, who lost to New England earlier in the season.
So listen up. Green Bay is for real and they can play with the Patriots. Imagine that Super Bowl? First one to use a running play loses.
How good does it get?
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Yeah, Farve can cure cancer, stop the war in Iraq, balance the Nation's budget, and leap tall buildings in a single bound.

Chuck Norris is afraid of him, too! :cool: :rolleyes:
 

Rackat

Active Member
Messages
2,134
Reaction score
1
5Stars;1786994 said:
Yeah, Farve can cure cancer, stop the war in Iraq, balance the Nation's budget, and leap tall buildings in a single bound.

Chuck Norris is afraid of him, too! :cool: :rolleyes:
Brett threw a pass to Chuck Norris and had to "take a little off" so as not to hurt Chuck's hands.
 

SacredStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,183
Reaction score
1,541
The Patriots would destroy the Packers just as they have every team they have faced.

Who is this writer trying to fool?
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
Here we go again. The latest ice cream flavor are the Packers and not the Cowboys. Didn't we hear it early in the season when the Bears had the best NFL defense and would beat the Cowboys. Then, again we heard the Giants being hyped up with their great defense/sack attack who would beat the Bears. Now, here we go again. They marvel at the great numbers Favre is putting up against the Lions -- one of the worse defenses in the NFL.

Well the Cowboys don't have one of the worst defenses, but we do have 2 real good sack artists in Ware & Ellis and a few other good defenders which the other teams the Packers played didn't have. We also have a pretty good offense which some of the teams the Packers played didn't have.

I think the Packers and the rest of the so called experts who think the Packers are so good will be in for a little surprise when they play the Cowboys. I can just hear the announcers say something "did anybody see this coming" as we wallop the Packers in Big D.

BTW: It's nonsense to say that Packers have a chance to beat the Patriots. Belicheat his and crew will light them up big time. Bet the Patriots run the score up so they total the most points scored.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
I would put Tnew and Henry (when Healthy) up against Harris and Woodson. This idiot Prisco makes it look like they dominated the Lions, which they did only in spurts. And what makes the Lions all that much to beat? Ellis and Ware beat their two best rushers. Romo is better then Favre is now. We have (when Crayton is playing) better skill position talent. We have a clear offensive edge, as indicated by the stats. Defensively its closer but we still have an edge. But what do you expect from mediots?
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
Gryphon;1786989 said:
We might have football heaven: Two teams that won't hand off.
That's not football heaven, it's called the arena league.
 

BLEU3ASY

Well-Known Member
Messages
994
Reaction score
277
SacredStar;1787014 said:
The Patriots would destroy the Packers just as they have every team they have faced.

Who is this writer trying to fool?

he is the fool.
 

DawnOfANewD

New Member
Messages
674
Reaction score
0
Could have something to do with the perceived differences in our strengths of schedule:

The 10 teams we beat have a combined W-L of 41-60.

The 10 teams GB has beaten have a combined W-L of 49-52.
 

Aikbach

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,746
Reaction score
42
A team that allowed for the lowly Lions to make a fourth quarter surge is going to win the Super Bowl? News for the reporter, they won by 11 and it was a close game not a dominating one.

A team that needed help from Denver just to survive until overtime is going to beat New England?

A team that lost to the Chicago Bears at home is going to win it all?
 

Aikbach

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,746
Reaction score
42
DawnOfANewD;1787117 said:
Could have something to do with the perceived differences in our strengths of schedule:

The 10 teams we beat have a combined W-L of 41-60.

The 10 teams GB has beaten have a combined W-L of 49-52.
They also played San Diego and Denver when those teams were in an early season funk.
 
Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
I honestly believe Dallas and Green Bay are the only two teams that could pull the upset... They have a lot of weapons as well.
 

calico

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,963
Reaction score
3,150
funny cause greenbay fans think we are over hyped...
 

FloridaRob

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,460
Reaction score
1,982
calico;1787222 said:
funny cause greenbay fans think we are over hyped...

I post on 4 Packer message boards and view several others. None of them discount how good a team the Cowboys are. You might see some yahoo make some outlandish prediction that the Packers will crush the Cowboys, but it is no different than here where several posters act like the Packers are lucky to be 10 and 1 and they should not even play the game.....like the Cowboys are entitled to win without playing. .

Losing to your hated rival at home is not like losing to the Christian Academy for the Blind. It happens. Packers went to Denver and won. They didnt cheat. They won it. Then six days later they went to KC and won in an environment that not many NFC teams do well in. They didnt cheat then either.

They have won the games when they were on the schedule. They didnt make the schedule. Don;t forget they won those games early on when every predicted Green Bay to suck this year so the Packes should not even have been able to win them in the 4th quarter.

As a season goes along, teams will improve along the way. Last year the Packers were 4 and 8 and ended 8 and 8. So over the past 15 games they are 13 and 2. I don't care what league you play in, you win like that you are good team and deserve whatever praise people are goiing to give you.
 

vicjagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,110
Reaction score
1,934
DawnOfANewD;1787117 said:
Could have something to do with the perceived differences in our strengths of schedule:

The 10 teams we beat have a combined W-L of 41-60.

The 10 teams GB has beaten have a combined W-L of 49-52.

Yea, but Dallas' only loss is to a team that is 10-0. Green Bay lost by 7 to a 4-6 team at home that Dallas beat by 24 on the road.
 

FloridaRob

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,460
Reaction score
1,982
vicjagger;1787337 said:
Yea, but Dallas' only loss is to a team that is 10-0. Green Bay lost by 7 to a 4-6 team at home that Dallas beat by 24 on the road.

Be sure and discount the fact that Green Bay and Chicago are hated rivals. Can't compare teams that are rivals and what they do against other teams. You can't really compare what one team did another anyway. Different day, different game. Green Bay beat Minnesota by 34 to nothing. Dallas only beat them by 34 14 or something like that. You know what that means for Thursday. NOTHING>>>>>
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
Green Bay is a damn good team and I personally think they could give the Cheats a run. That being said, I think Dallas can beat the Cheats too if the penalties even out and we have Henry, Newman and Reeves all healthy. We played them closer than the final score indicates.

I hope we beat the Pack, and I think we will, but let's not go off pretending like they are not a good team.
 
Top