Who deserves to be the next (retired) Ring of Honor inductee?

Silverstar

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,912
Reaction score
3,031
I would have to go with Woody over Pearson.


Pearson did average 16 yards a catch, but never had more than 62 receptions or 8 TD's in a season. Pearson's career also pales in comparison with Bob Hayes and Michael Irvin's. As a matter of fact, even Tony Hill has a better average more yardage and 1 more TD than Pearson in less games.

But don't take my word for it...look for yourself.

http://users.conwaycorp.net/tstone/receiver.html



Sorry Drew... :eek::


:starspin
 

calico

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,898
Reaction score
3,049
Pearson. That would take away one of the arguments against his HOF status that he is not even in his own team's ring of honor.
 

Star-Fan

Old enough to remember the Ice Bowl, Young enough
Messages
276
Reaction score
2
Pearson did average 16 yards a catch, but never had more than 62 receptions or 8 TD's in a season. Pearson's career also pales in comparison with Bob Hayes and Michael Irvin's. As a matter of fact, even Tony Hill has a better average more yardage and 1 more TD than Pearson in less games.

But don't take my word for it...look for yourself.

http://users.conwaycorp.net/tstone/receiver.html



Sorry Drew... :eek::


:starspin[/QUOTE]

Hill was a nice reciever for us, some would argue great. (FWIW) I feel, had Drew not had that tragic auto accident, his career would have had another few years to it ( again my opinion :) So, I vote for DREW. Heck, even Irvin mistakenly had him in the ROH already. (see yesterdays press Conf.)

On a side note, with the new stadium the 'Boys will get their own HOF. Most of these other great 'Boys will be in that HOF, and the ROH will be reservrd for LEGENDS. :bow:
 
Top