Cincycowboy
Active Member
- Messages
- 133
- Reaction score
- 171
After reading many Commander fans bemoaning the injusticeof Monk not being in the Hall, I decided to analyze his stats compared to two cowboys who I think should be in, Irvin and Hayes.
On rankings, no doubt Monk looks like he was a dominate WR during his career but looks can be decieving. Looking at the numbers, he played 70 more games than Irvin and over 90 more than Hayes. So what is the best way to compare? Per game averages.
Adjusting Irvin's and Hayes's game total to match Monk's. The chart shows that if those two would have played as many games as long as Monk, there would be no comparsion.
Just for fun, I did the same calculation comparing Irvin and Rice and othe than TDs, the two are very similar.
I am not saying that Monk does not belong in the HOF, just that Hayes and Irvin deserve it more.
I am having trouble coverting the chart for good viewing. I will edit it as soon as I can.
On rankings, no doubt Monk looks like he was a dominate WR during his career but looks can be decieving. Looking at the numbers, he played 70 more games than Irvin and over 90 more than Hayes. So what is the best way to compare? Per game averages.
Adjusting Irvin's and Hayes's game total to match Monk's. The chart shows that if those two would have played as many games as long as Monk, there would be no comparsion.
Just for fun, I did the same calculation comparing Irvin and Rice and othe than TDs, the two are very similar.
I am not saying that Monk does not belong in the HOF, just that Hayes and Irvin deserve it more.
I am having trouble coverting the chart for good viewing. I will edit it as soon as I can.