fortdick;4494735 said:Romo, Ware, Lee, Coakley?
I have to say Tony Romo. Ware is great, and a probable HoF'er, but at this point, we don't go any where without Romo.
That is why it is important to take OL in the first.
Excuse me while I duck for cover.
dwarecwby311;4494778 said:Ware or Witten
would've put Romo in there if it weren't for the Lions game last seaon
PJTHEDOORS;4494829 said:Coakley is back playing? Isn't he in his 40s by now?
So if Witten has a bad game or Ware get's shutout, that doesn't count? But if Romo has a bad 1/2 game he get demoted?dwarecwby311;4494778 said:Ware or Witten
would've put Romo in there if it weren't for the Lions game last seaon
Thankstexbumthelife;4494842 said:I am glad someone mentioned Tyron Smith. I think Ware is our best player but I think Tyron (if he improves at all this season) becomes our best player at our most important position.
DFWJC;4494839 said:So if Witten has a bad game or Ware get's shutout, that doesn't count? But if Romo has a bad game(S) and can't be depended on in the post season he get demoted?
The30YardSlant;4494895 said:The correct answer is DeMarcus Ware.
Beast_from_East;4494901 said:Ware is the best player talent wise, but without Romo we are a sub .500 team so our best player talent wise is not neccessarily our most important player.
If I had to pick either Romo or Ware to be out the season, I would go with Romo playing over Ware.
