Who was worse: Pettiti or Tucker?

Tucker, Tucker, Tucker all day long. At least Petitti has an excuse- he's a rookie who has been making progress after being thrown in the fire. Tucker will not and should not be on this team next year. He's just not good.
 
I think the entire OL should be reevaluated for next year. Except for LA, they all should be nervous. Pettiti's a good backup at this point.
 
Tucker...he gave up 4 sacks. The dude was beat on nearly every play. I mean Bledsoe sucked, but on a bunch of plays he barely had time to set his feet to scan the field. He spent more time avoiding defenders than scanning the field.

But this begs the question, how bad are the backups if Tucker is the best among them and granted the start??

-cowboys dave
 
Everyone was poor. Tucker was the worst. I hope we can find an answer to our O-Line woes in the off season.
 
Kangaroo said:
Why is LA getting a pass when he blows ?

...him one. There was specifically three plays in the first quarter when Allen could have made a difference and he either stumbled, whiffed or did not get to his position byt he time the runner was looking for the block.

He's really a liability in space and slowly losing his reputation as a top notch pulling guard. I think he's tired and lost some of his stamina in his legs.

We have ten close dogfights and that's taxing on a body. That's why Parcells wanted him to work more on his lower body strength.
 
For a rookie, I thought Petitti played o.k. today. Also, I don't recall him getting any penalties either.

Petitti played pretty well vs. the Chiefs last week as well.

I think/hope that next year Petitti will be a lot better as he's showing promise this season. His technique, strength, and another year in the system should definitely improve his performance in 2006.
 
Tucker. Rookie 6th round picks forced into action = free pass in my book.
 
Back
Top