Who would you clone?

MarionBarberThe4th

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,411
Reaction score
5,387
Maybe a dumb question, maybe im drunk...

I guess you can clone Romo and trade him for a ton of picks, or clone Ware and put him opposite Ware and wreak havoc :eek:
 

Garret

Member
Messages
131
Reaction score
23
I know some other names would prob make us better team. But imagine if you had biggs at both guards with our o-line. That front would dominate some people.
 

ndanger

Active Member
Messages
2,298
Reaction score
13
Myself. Twice as much football. Bonus, make myself do all the stuff I don't
I don't like to do.
 

cowboyuptx

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
617
There's really only 2 obvious choices, it's either Ware or Owens, no other answer makes much sense.... And since we already have Ellis and Spencer, TO's the only correct answer at this time....
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,306
Reaction score
63,996
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
cowboyuptx;2172630 said:
There's really only 2 obvious choices, it's either Ware or Owens, no other answer makes much sense.... And since we already have Ellis and Spencer, TO's the only correct answer at this time....
I disagree. We already have Ellis and Spencer, but two OLBs with Ware would beat out any Ware/Ellis or Ware/Spencer combinations. Any offense facing that defense would be ready to throw in the towel before the game started. Or, at least, any opposing quarterback would be, if he was sane.

Having two Owens would increase offensive production perhaps 300/400 or so more receiving yards than what Crayton did last season and possibly double his touchdown output, to say the 12-14 TD range, but at what cost? Two #1 receivers would demand the ball twice as much as the single one we have now and would decrease the effectiveness of our pro bowl tight end Jason Witten by decreasing his number of opportunities to catch the ball. In my opinion, the best trio would be Owens/Witten/solid #2 receiver like a Roy Williams over that of a Owens/Witten/Owens because there would be more of an equal ratio of distributed passes.
 

JohnL2288

Member
Messages
176
Reaction score
8
ELDudearino;2172550 said:
TO, thread closed:D

you would have both guys wanting the ball, which would lead to both of them being unhappy and pouting, disrupting the team. This would only work if we could keep one in suspended animation until the other got hurt :)
 

NoLuv4Jerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,698
Reaction score
4,911
I would clone any of the guys that we absolutley cannot afford to get injured...Romo, TO, and Ware. Not necessarily in that order. Actually, the order I would do that in is TO, Romo, Ware. TO first because if we had 2 they could play at the same time. Romo 2nd because if he goes down the season is over, but having 2 does not benefit us if the original does not get hurt. And Ware 3rd because even if he got hurt we have some capable replacements, but at the same time if we had 2 they could play at the same time and be absolutley terror.
 

cleverusername

New Member
Messages
803
Reaction score
0
Clones.png


The only man worth cloning. We could have an entire army!
 
Top