Who would you take?

[sureletsrace]

Warmack, Richardson, and Vacarro are all there at 18. Cooper, Lotulelei, Floyd, etc are gone.

Who's your pick?

I'd take Warmack. I believe our safety and d-line are in better shape than our o-line is, and I think this draft is deeper in safety and d-line talent than it is in o-line talent. Warmack has the potential to be a perennial pro-bowl caliber player.

 

[DrKennethNoisewater]

Warmack without hesitation.

 

[Denim Chicken]

Richardson.

 

[laythewood28]

I would probably select Richardson because he would probably make more of an impact. Id be happy with Warmack, but we need 2 or 3 new starters out of that line to actually see a difference.

 

[DrKennethNoisewater]

Seriously? Richardson over Warmack? Horrid. I can get that if you think DT is a bigger position of need, but straight BPA there is no way Richardson is a better player.

 

[ferrispata]

Warmack for sure. Besides I think Warmack will go before Cooper anyway.

 

[Denim Chicken]

Seriously? Richardson over Warmack? Horrid. I can get that if you think DT is a bigger position of need, but straight BPA there is no way Richardson is a better player.

I can't judge a Guard and a DT on equal footing. There may be a excellent kicker available, but I'm not taking him at #18.

 

[TheSport78]

Richardson over Warmack.

Love Warmack but the scheme fit with Richardson is too much to pass up on.

 

[laythewood28]

Seriously? Richardson over Warmack? Horrid. I can get that if you think DT is a bigger position of need, but straight BPA there is no way Richardson is a better player.

On this team he would be unless Jerry and Garrett decide to GO all in and fix this line. Warmack would be a diamond surrounded by trash.

 

[TheSport78]

On this team he would be unless Jerry and Garrett decide to GO all in and fix this line. Warmack would be a diamond surrounded by trash.

I don't consider Tyron Smith trash.

 

[erod]

I'd take Warmack and hope to hell that Richardson doesn't turn out to be the next Justin Smith or Geno Atkins.

 

[jazzcat22]

Good question...I'm not sure on what position has more depth in this draft, but supposedly both DL & OL has a lot. So who would make it to the 2nd round that can help at either position.

I am leaning for Warmack over Richarson. Get a DT in 2nd round.

 

[erod]

I don't consider Tyron Smith trash.

Nor is the offensive line free agent we sign after the draft (hopefully).

 

[laythewood28]

I don't consider Tyron Smith trash.

I don't either but Costa, Livings, Bern, and Free Definitely are. Like I said if Jerry and co go all in then Warmack would be my guy, but if you are leaving the oline virtually as it has been expect the same results.

 

[9darter]

Seriously? Richardson over Warmack? Horrid. I can get that if you think DT is a bigger position of need, but straight BPA there is no way Richardson is a better player.

Richardson. He's by far the better value pick.

 

[ufcrules1]

I would take Richardson as well.

 

[DrKennethNoisewater]

Richardson. He's by far the better value pick.

That is simply not true.

 

[burmafrd]

Richardson. He's by far the better value pick.

value means squat. Warmack is considered the better talent at his position then richardson is at his

 

[Echo9]

Warmack without hesitation.

I think it's a good argument between Richardson and Warmack. The down side to Warmack supposedly is that he's more of a road grader type whereas we are looking to run a zone blocking scheme (again...supposedly).

Another factor involved is that Moore is still out there in FA. If we had a plan in place to sign Moore after the draft, I think that would lessen the blow of not picking Warmack.

All that said, I'd still take Warmack, but it would be a tough choice.

 

[RSM94]

With the Boys' Swiss Cheese O-line, has to be Warmack....