BrAinPaiNt;1408821 said:I think it is because they think he is dreamy and because he plays piano.
BrAinPaiNt;1408821 said:I think it is because they think he is dreamy and because he plays piano.
newlander;1408841 said:Thanks for weighing in guys. Harrington and Ramsey backers on this forum are............... . These two QB's are one in the same. Whiney, non-productive LOSERS. Period. Whereas Brad Johnson has been the complete opposite in his career. Yes, he's long in the tooth, but if he wasn't we wouldn't have been able to ink him as a backup and mentor to Romo. Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessh.......
GimmeTheBall!;1408828 said::laugh2:
And he likes long walks on the beach and writes about unicorns.
InmanRoshi;1408865 said:He's no Cleo Lemon
Billy Bullocks;1408874 said:I personally would not mind Brad Johnson one bit. He greatly outplayed Culpepper in Minnesota. And yeah, he did win that SB. If Romo is out for a few games, I think Johnson would giv eus the best chance to come in and win.
Harrington and Ramsey are liked because they are relatively young, and both had upside early in their careers. I think it seems those guys would be able to be backups for a long time
Miami was decent until Culpepper and Harrington showed up. Detroit has an awful defense, but their offense wasn't too bad last year.Eddie;1408967 said:We are all infatuated with Harrington's youth, draft status, potential potential, and the fact that he played on some lousy teams.
Hey, reminds me of Leonard Davis.
Eddie;1408967 said:We are all infatuated with Harrington's youth, draft status, potential potential, and the fact that he played on some lousy teams.
Hey, reminds me of Leonard Davis.
BrAinPaiNt;1408821 said:I think it is because they think he is dreamy and because he plays piano.