Obviously, he wants to retire and not play any more. I feel that Weeden it's just as good as Orton. Last I saw it will save us some cash.
So what's the hold up... Can't we just cut him/ move on? (Push him to retire)
Can't keep letting these idiots take advantage of their situations (See: Ratliff)....gotta send a message...I still say max fine him for anything that he misses and cut him on the last possible day so that the team doesn't owe his 2014 salary and he can't get ready to play for someone else....
Can't keep letting these idiots take advantage of their situations (See: Ratliff)....gotta send a message...I still say max fine him for anything that he misses and cut him on the last possible day so that the team doesn't owe his 2014 salary and he can't get ready to play for someone else....
Does he even want to play?
No we just can't cut him, he will retain all his $$$. If he retires he has to pay back $3 million, and I believe that gets added onto the cap that we have left.
Does he even want to play?
A lot of sites have it as $3M but I don't see how that would be the case. His initial deal was 3 years with $5M as a bonus. He's fulfilled 2 of those so I'm not sure why he'd pay more than $1.6M.
Maybe there's more to it, I dunno.
I don't even think we need to cut him necessarily... I think we can just put him on the reserve/retired list. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Cheaper to keep herObviously, he wants to retire and not play any more. I feel that Weeden it's just as good as Orton. Last I saw it will save us some cash.
So what's the hold up... Can't we just cut him/ move on? (Push him to retire)
It was technically a 5 year deal, but called a 3 year deal because the final 2 were dummy voidable years that allowed the team to stretch out the bonus for cap purposes. That leaves 3 years remaining of 5 on a 5M bonus, i.e. 3/5 * 5M = 3M.
If he had just played 1 more year, then it would have voided and he would not have to pay back anything.
What if, on the off chance, he does? And he just wants out of Dallas? Still have to consider that this is a Ratliff type situation.
Holding him until as late as possible won't do anything to prevent him from getting a job.
QBs who can play will always be picked up.
And you don't think the arbitrator would view it as a 3 year deal, if that's what it really is? Regardless of what it technically was, I doubt any mediator is going to ignore the actual commitment length.
If he's only required to play 3 years, how can anyone justify taking more money from him based on how the Cowboys manage their cap?
Obviously, he wants to retire and not play any more. I feel that Weeden it's just as good as Orton. Last I saw it will save us some cash.
So what's the hold up... Can't we just cut him/ move on? (Push him to retire)
Holding him until as late as possible won't do anything to prevent him from getting a job.
QBs who can play will always be picked up.
Obviously, he wants to retire and not play any more. I feel that Weeden it's just as good as Orton. Last I saw it will save us some cash.
So what's the hold up... Can't we just cut him/ move on? (Push him to retire)
The years count until they are voided. Which they haven't.