Dale
Forum Architect
- Messages
- 7,785
- Reaction score
- 7,395
Throw me in the camp of "I can't blame him."
I hate to see his old cancerous ways emerge, but why DID we sign him if we're not going to use him more?
My opinion has always been that it only makes sense to commit to TO if we're willing to make a (even slight) philosophical change on offense. Before the season, I even said we better not be planning on just sliding TO into Key's old role.
We have a tremendous weapon and it seems like we're content with using him as a decoy. I don't care much for that.
I hate to see his old cancerous ways emerge, but why DID we sign him if we're not going to use him more?
My opinion has always been that it only makes sense to commit to TO if we're willing to make a (even slight) philosophical change on offense. Before the season, I even said we better not be planning on just sliding TO into Key's old role.
We have a tremendous weapon and it seems like we're content with using him as a decoy. I don't care much for that.