Why disguise and confusion is no problem for Cowboys Dak Prescott

[LouBrown]

The truth does not have to be creative.

The idea that you think that there's any sort of "truth" in fans' interpretation of Dak's facial expressions is hilariously stupid.

That's besides the point that it's irrelevant to the point of the thread.

 

[diamonddelts]

The idea that you think that there's any sort of "truth" in fans' interpretation of Dak's facial expressions is hilariously stupid.

That's besides the point that it's irrelevant to the point of the thread.

One thousand yard stare coming soon to a tv near you in January.

 

[DallasEast]

Over/under 10 pages

Another Dak Prescott thread may have entered the picture and deflated this thread's sails, lol. I still think this one will eventually hit 10 pages, but it may end up limping over the finish line instead.

 

[Cowfan75Lives]

Dak has no problem with being confused. He has mastered it.

 

[Rockport]

Dak has no problem with being confused. He has mastered it.

I think you have DDS as well. Here’s the facts.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/best-qbr-under-pressure

 

[gtb1943]

I think you have DDS as well. Here’s the facts.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/best-qbr-under-pressure

funny how that stat is not broken down to say playoff games and like the last few minutes of big games.
dak bots are so desperate
because according to this stat, Dak is better than Tom Brady was

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

The idea that you think that there's any sort of "truth" in fans' interpretation of Dak's facial expressions is hilariously stupid.

That's besides the point that it's irrelevant to the point of the thread.

The facial expression matches the on the field playoff performance. It is a summation of the evidence from which people draw logical conclusions, regarding the playoffs.

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

I think you have DDS as well. Here’s the facts.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/best-qbr-under-pressure

In all likelihood some will make bold claims here and then come up with the same excuses at the end of the season. Many of us expect as much.

 

[Cowfan75Lives]

I think you have DDS as well. Here’s the facts.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/best-qbr-under-pressure

No thanks, Rocky...I take playoff wins over stats.

 

[Rockport]

No thanks, Rocky...I take playoff wins over stats.

Me too. I was just proving a point.

 

[Cowfan75Lives]

Me too. I was just proving a point.

What point?

 

[LouBrown]

The facial expression matches the on the field playoff performance. It is a summation of the evidence from which people draw logical conclusions, regarding the playoffs.

Lmao doubling and tripling down like you're all body language experts and scientists.

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Lmao doubling and tripling down like you're all body language experts and scientists.

different year, same results. It is always the same in that the same people make bold predictions at the beginning of the year, and come back with the same excuses that contradict what they said in the preseason. It's like you're acting like we haven't seen this same movie before.

 

[ratkinson]

Dak is gonna break out soon and yield some postseason success. It's just math. All top 5 QBs eventually break out at some point. Stafford did it, even if he was 36 and had to be traded to a much better organization for it to happen.

Dak will stay, and do it in a crappy organization. Cause he doesn't run when the going gets tough.

Nah, he folds.

 

[beware_d-ware]

Dak's got the mental side of QB'ing on lock. I have been seriously impressed with his decision making the past 2 seasons, in how well he balances risk with aggression. And he throws with anticipation, which is frankly something I never thought he would figure out. At this point, he operates the offense like a QB coach on the field.

Now it's just a question of how long his arm holds up. His legs are shot at this point - even if he has any juice to run, he won't b/c of the injury risk. His arm hasn't really declined, but it was never better than NFL average to begin with, so he doesn't have much to lose before he dips under the Chad Pennington line. So long as his arm stays above pop-gun level, he'll remain a top 10 QB just on smarts alone.

 

[5Starter]

I think this was a great interview today with Darren Woodson and I agree that Dak has what it takes to win a SB.

But that's just part of it obv, worse quarterbacks have won rings and great quarterbacks have failed.
As Woodson says, in the playoffs you face strong defenses and they're gonna get stops. But if your team can't stop their offense then your offense is sitting on the sideline aware of it and to me this is where Dallas has failed over and over.
I mentioned before there's only about 4 times Dallas has had a top 10 defense (Since Romo) and in those 4 times they were a playoff team. I think they only had a 1k yard runningback once before Murray during Romo's entire starting career.
If your defense is garbage and can't stop the other team then maybe putting all the burden to win on your qb (who is facing a legit defense) is unfair and unrealistic.

 

[SoupcanSam]

It's not even an attempt to be creative lol

Pretty much sums up the last 30 years of the cowboys

 

[zrinkill]

If you’re going to constantly insult me then sayonara.

Hilarious coming from you.

 

[LouBrown]

different year, same results. It is always the same in that the same people make bold predictions at the beginning of the year, and come back with the same excuses that contradict what they said in the preseason. It's like you're acting like we haven't seen this same movie before.

Cool. This has nothing to do with anything.

Blathering for the sake of blathering

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Cool. This has nothing to do with anything.

Blathering for the sake of blathering

Has everything to do with it. Who is the original poster? What was posted the year before? And the year before that? Oh I forget, you are new around here. I mean it is the same old story, the same results, year after year. The definition of insanity, is it to believe the same thing each year, when nothing really changes, in this case?