Why no Buckner?

[jblaze2004]

Imagine the twin towers Irving and buckner in the middle of the dline in passrush situations with crawford coming off the edge until lawrence and gregory get back. Then we can have a good mix passrush. Remember build your teams from the inside out. The good teams are built that way. For some reason i rather kind of draft buckner than go with bosa.

 

[Wood]

he is more of DE in 3-4 but I have been higher on him than most. Anyway we shake this Dallas is getting really good player.

 

[Gaede]

If we don't go Zeke, I hope it's Buckner. He gives you immediate impact and upside for the long run

 

[texbumthelife]

I'd take him in a trade down and plug him in on the strong-side. I think he could be very similar to Anthony Spencer--an unheralded guy who does the dirty work. I don't think he'll ever be a big sack guy though and don't think he will be as disruptive as Bosa.

 

[Paniolo22]

I'll go back to the Nat'l Chapionship game last year. Bosa dominated and Buckner did nothing. I'm not a Bosa fan, but if we do go DE, it has to be Bosa.

 

[Toruk_Makto]

He isn't a scheme fit and there are better players.

 

[darthseinfeld]

he is more of DE in 3-4 but I have been higher on him than most. Anyway we shake this Dallas is getting really good player.

IMO he is a hybrid DE /DT in our system. Run down LDE and likely the 3 Tech in sub packages. Would play most of his snaps at DT.

I see some Muhammad Wilkerson in him

 

[jblaze2004]

IMO he is a hybrid DE /DT in our system. Run down LDE and likely the 3 Tech in sub packages. Would play most of his snaps at DT.

I see some Muhammad Wilkerson in him

this. I see some wilkerson in him too.