Why not run a hurry-up?

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,182
Reaction score
3,933
Seriously....it seems that Romo gets in a groove when we're running the two-minute offense.

I'm not saying this should be the offense we run all the time. I'm still a guy that loves to see three yards and a cloud of dust (or manufactured rubber granules), but we need to get back on track somehow.
 
OR play with some sense of urgency at the freakin' start of the game instead of waiting till the last 6 minutes.:bang2:
 
Jenky;3092848 said:
OR play with some sense of urgency at the freakin' start of the game instead of waiting till the last 6 minutes.:bang2:
The hurry up should provide some sort of urgency...


I've wanted Garrett to do it forever, it's not a mystery that Tony plays better when the game is on the line and there is a sense of urgency.
 
Bizwah;3092809 said:
Seriously....it seems that Romo gets in a groove when we're running the two-minute offense.

I'm not saying this should be the offense we run all the time. I'm still a guy that loves to see three yards and a cloud of dust (or manufactured rubber granules), but we need to get back on track somehow.

so the defense can rest.
 
I would love for us to run the hurry up on the first drive of each half....and at least two other possessions per half. Sometimes it is good to slow it down....but I feel that Tony gets in a groove when we are faster paced......also, our OL are less likely to false start.
 
Can you imagine the reaction if we screwed up our hurry-up? You think penalties are bad now? Wait until you have the 2nd most undisciplined team in the league changing snap counts every play.
 
because the hurry up is for hurry up situations. There is something to be said about controlling the clock and playing solid defense.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,818
Messages
13,899,308
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top