Will an all-22 of the Rams game be made available?

[tyke1doe]

Louis Riddick was on Stephen A. Smith's show today, and said he saw the all-22 film of the Cowboys vs. Rams playoff game which showed the Cowboys receivers was running wide open all game long, but Dak couldn't connect with them.
Sure would like to see the all-22 of this game.

 

[Parcells4Life]

NFL game pass

 

[texbumthelife]

Louis Riddick was on Stephen A. Smith's show today, and said he saw the all-22 film of the Cowboys vs. Rams playoff game which showed the Cowboys receivers was running wide open all game long, but Dak couldn't connect with them.
Sure would like to see the all-22 of this game.

I said during the game that I wanted to see the All-22 for this very reason. I've asked several times since then, including the morning after, if anyone had access.

 

[DogFace]

How about they back up the camera for the regular broadcast? At least after he drops back to pass.

Some choices like they offered in the National championship would be s welcome change. With better choices.

 

[CB61]

Louis Riddick was on Stephen A. Smith's show today, and said he saw the all-22 film of the Cowboys vs. Rams playoff game which showed the Cowboys receivers was running wide open all game long, but Dak couldn't connect with them.
Sure would like to see the all-22 of this game.

Of course I tape all games I just looked at the Rams game they were running wide open as far as I could see we missed a lot of opportunities but of course when your quarterback has pressure in his face immediately it's hard to see what we need back is Fred beard although Looney did a admirable job we need Fred beard back

 

[Super_Kazuya]

How about they back up the camera for the regular broadcast? At least after he drops back to pass.

Some choices like they offered in the National championship would be s welcome change. With better choices.

I’ve often wondered about this too. Strangely enough I think after all these years the broadcast is still centered for standard, square (non-HDTV) TV viewing. There’s literally no reason to show so much of the backfield.
Of course we now have a generation of Madden players who also wouldn’t mind a behind the QB view if the game.

 

[xwalker]

I’ve often wondered about this too. Strangely enough I think after all these years the broadcast is still centered for standard, square (non-HDTV) TV viewing. There’s literally no reason to show so much of the backfield.
Of course we now have a generation of Madden players who also wouldn’t mind a behind the QB view if the game.

The broadcasts are done with true HD cameras and sent to your TV as HD. If you have DirecTV or cable there is compression/decompression involved but it is still the same HD image size. Compression would only affect some of the fine details of the picture.

Over-the-Air broadcasts are not compressed; although it's possible that compression was involved between the network and the local broadcast station. Regardless it's still HD video in a 16:9 format.

1080p: 1920x1080
720p: 1280x720
SD (US); 640x480 interlaced

In the US, SD (NTSC) is 480i and in Europe SD (PAL) is 576i.

 

[CB61]

Of course I tape all games I just looked at the Rams game they were running wide open as far as I could see we missed a lot of opportunities but of course when your quarterback has pressure in his face immediately it's hard to see what we need back is Fred beard although Looney did a admirable job we need Fred beard back

Of course I'm not sure what all 22 is I'm assuming it's a rewind of the game

 

[Super_Kazuya]

The broadcasts are done with true HD cameras and sent to your TV as HD. If you have DirecTV or cable there is compression/decompression involved but it is still the same HD image size. Compression would only affect some of the fine details of the picture.

Over-the-Air broadcasts are not compressed; although it's possible that compression was involved between the network and the local broadcast station. Regardless it's still HD video in a 16:9 format.

1080p: 1920x1080
720p: 1280x720
SD (US); 640x480 interlaced

In the US, SD (NTSC) is 480i and in Europe SD (PAL) is 576i.

I know all of this. I am talking about the framing. The camera person purposely frames the broadcast for a 4:3 presentation. It was understandable when the switch to HDTV was first made, but it’s weird to me that in 2019 they are still doing this.

 

[xwalker]

I know all of this. I am talking about the framing. The camera person purposely frames the broadcast for a 4:3 presentation. It was understandable when the switch to HDTV was first made, but it’s weird to me that in 2019 they are still doing this.

The cameras follow the ball.

HDs shows more of the field at a given zoom setting.

The only way we would not see more of the field would be if they started zooming in more at some point after they started broadcasting in HD.

The amount of zoom on the wide shots does vary between networks. CBS is a little closer to an All-22 view than Fox. I actually prefer the Fox method because I can see more detail in the area of the OL/DL.

 

[CPanther95]

The broadcasts are done with true HD cameras and sent to your TV as HD. If you have DirecTV or cable there is compression/decompression involved but it is still the same HD image size. Compression would only affect some of the fine details of the picture.

Over-the-Air broadcasts are not compressed; although it's possible that compression was involved between the network and the local broadcast station. Regardless it's still HD video in a 16:9 format.

1080p: 1920x1080
720p: 1280x720
SD (US); 640x480 interlaced

In the US, SD (NTSC) is 480i and in Europe SD (PAL) is 576i.

Unfortunately, OTA broadcasts are also heavily compressed. They showed Congress all the pretty pictures we'd get if they got their digital bandwidth then after they got it almost all affiliates decided to cram 2,3 or 5 subchannels on the same channel by starving the primary channel of its bandwidth.

Dish Network used to remove about a third of the resolution until they got busted for advertising 1080 channels but not actually supplying 1080. Now they still cut about a third but they only remove vertical lines so it's still 1080 - except instead of 1920 x 1080, it's 1280 x 1080 and then upconverted to HD.

Now that they are promoting 4K, once again they are putting their best foot forward. Once everyone has adopted it they'll butcher that just the same. Just take a look at a 4K TV with a 4K football game and and see how incredible it looks. Even if you are only 10ft from a 70" 4K display, you are too far away from distinguishing 1080 from 4K. That's the picture quality we should be getting (on CBS/NBC not FOX/ESPN). - but it's not even close from anybody .

We'd see them start to use more creative framing and shots that take advantage of HD, but they know HD isn't making it to the viewer, so they don't do much different than before.

. . In fact, if you've ever seen the standard definition signal that used to be delivered to the truck outside the stadium, you'd think that was HD compared to what you are seeing at home..