jday
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,321
- Reaction score
- 13,284
For a little bit over a month we Cowboys fans have not been able to visit any of our normal haunts without finding a collection of conversations devoted to contracts and how to fit them in that infamous pie we all know and love, the NFL Salary Cap. The big three (Dak, Coop, Zeke) - will they sign before the season? Will Zeke be back in time for the first game? Who will swerve first, Zeke or the Front Office?
Lines have been drawn, sides have been chosen and for the better part of training camp, a war has choked the life out of Dallas Cowboys associated social media. The finest minds in sports reporting have been devoted to the play-by-play of negotiations, when their services could have been better served on practice breakdowns complete with game/practice tape gifs. But alas! It was not to be in this here 2019 training camp.
And so we wait and wait and wait.
Of what has come out, it seems very apparent that Zeke’s resolve is partly wanting to be recognized as the best in his field, but he has also been outspoken about his belief that RB’s are woefully underpaid, and my guess is he feels he owes it to every professional Running Back present and future, to get every penny he believes he is owed, hometown discount be-damned.
On the opposite end of that spectrum is a front office that believes running backs are being overpaid and is attempting to ignore the market-setting contract Todd Gurley signed last year. The Joneses appear to be dug-in, as well, arguing from two fronts: 1. Zeke has 2 years left on his contract and if he wants an advance on his pay-raise, he will have to make concessions to match the Cowboys show of good faith alla Jaylon Smith. 2. The Cowboys are doubling-down on their newly minted #36, suggesting the Cowboys can win with Pollard, if Zeke forces their hand, potentially removing what leverage Zeke has, which would be the threat of a losing season.
Zeke’s best argument is the fact that RB’s as compared to other positions, simply do not have a good shelf-life in the league and the second contract is typically their one and only big one. The inevitable decline of the typical running back generally begins somewhere in the second contract, and very few see the end of that contract, which is why the guaranteed money might be the most important aspect of this conversation, that Zeke and his agent are looking at.
So while I completely understand Zeke’s stance, my hope is the Cowboys are able to further solidify what leverage they have by opening the season on a winning streak. The question is how do the Cowboys do that without arguably their best offensive weapon?
To be perfectly honest, that question both intrigues and terrifies me, for a multitude of reasons. Let’s start with the rookie that has captured the hearts and imagination of Cowboys Nation: Tony Pollard.
Within about 2 hours of the Cowboys drafting Tony in the fourth round of this year’s draft, I was ridiculously excited about the prospects of moving this kid all over the formation, as well as, his special teams’ contributions as a returner, considering he tied the NCAA record with 7 Touchdowns over his 3 year career. While at Memphis, he was used as a backup RB to their main guy Darrell Henderson, as a receiver, and all-over Special Teams (return and coverage units).
Perhaps the central concern regarding Tony potentially starting in Zeke’s stead (should the holdout continue) is that Tony has never truly been used as a Bellcow / 3-down running back that can run in any situations and pass protect / blitz pickup. Can he physically hold-up to the beating all that entails?
I really can’t answer that question and if Tony himself answered the question in the affirmative, I still wouldn’t believe it until I saw it. Furthermore, I think this is really the wrong question. That question suggest the Cowboys should use Pollard as if he is Zeke and in my opinion that would be a very bad idea.
Pollard is not a scat back in the traditional sense, (he possesses scat back ability with the ball in space) however, he’s not built like a Bellcow either. He is somewhere in between. So, while you could possibly convince me that Pollard would be fine for a game or two used in that capacity, subjected to an entire season of that treatment would likely end with Pollard on IR.
If the coaches / front office is expecting a protracted holdout from Zeke, Kellen Moore’s entire mindset of how to approach this offense will need to change. Think – The Greatest Show on Turf. Marshall Faulk (5’10” 211 lbs) is actually a decent comp for Pollard (6’0” 209 lbs). In Faulk’s first year with the St. Louis Rams (1999), he put up a total of 2,429 yards from scrimmage with 1,381 running yards (5.5 yards-per-carry) 1,048 receiving yards, and scoring 12 touchdowns. Faulk joined Roger Craig as the only men to total 1,000 + yards receiving and running in a season.
I am not trying to convince you that Pollard is the next Faulk, but I do think Pollard could be used in a similar way. After all, for a running back, he also runs very crisp routes, has excellent hands and reportedly has a very good head on his shoulders, picking up things very quickly for a rookie. I think Pollard would be up to the task.
Let’s review:
· The Cowboys may have to enter the season without the All-Pro service of Zeke Elliott.
· The Cowboys have in his place a multifaceted talent in Tony Pollard, who is capable of both running between the tackles and running routes like a receiver.
· In consideration of the different type of player Pollard is, Kellen Moore will need to adjust the offense to accommodate his style of play.
· What better way to do that then with the Coryel-style offense implemented by Mike Martz at the turn of the century.
· The Cowboys are already running an offense heavily inspired by Don Coryell, the predominant difference being the run to pass ratio and specifically how the running back is used in both running and passing concepts.
So why did Garrett invite Mike Martz of all people? Did he come to the same conclusion that I have? If the Cowboys have to go into the season and figure out a way to win without Zeke, Jason has to know they can’t use Pollard the same way they would Zeke. Is it possible that Jason sees potential for a rebirth of an aggressive offensive attack that took the league by storm at the turn of the century?
Thoughts?
Lines have been drawn, sides have been chosen and for the better part of training camp, a war has choked the life out of Dallas Cowboys associated social media. The finest minds in sports reporting have been devoted to the play-by-play of negotiations, when their services could have been better served on practice breakdowns complete with game/practice tape gifs. But alas! It was not to be in this here 2019 training camp.
And so we wait and wait and wait.
Of what has come out, it seems very apparent that Zeke’s resolve is partly wanting to be recognized as the best in his field, but he has also been outspoken about his belief that RB’s are woefully underpaid, and my guess is he feels he owes it to every professional Running Back present and future, to get every penny he believes he is owed, hometown discount be-damned.
On the opposite end of that spectrum is a front office that believes running backs are being overpaid and is attempting to ignore the market-setting contract Todd Gurley signed last year. The Joneses appear to be dug-in, as well, arguing from two fronts: 1. Zeke has 2 years left on his contract and if he wants an advance on his pay-raise, he will have to make concessions to match the Cowboys show of good faith alla Jaylon Smith. 2. The Cowboys are doubling-down on their newly minted #36, suggesting the Cowboys can win with Pollard, if Zeke forces their hand, potentially removing what leverage Zeke has, which would be the threat of a losing season.
Zeke’s best argument is the fact that RB’s as compared to other positions, simply do not have a good shelf-life in the league and the second contract is typically their one and only big one. The inevitable decline of the typical running back generally begins somewhere in the second contract, and very few see the end of that contract, which is why the guaranteed money might be the most important aspect of this conversation, that Zeke and his agent are looking at.
So while I completely understand Zeke’s stance, my hope is the Cowboys are able to further solidify what leverage they have by opening the season on a winning streak. The question is how do the Cowboys do that without arguably their best offensive weapon?
To be perfectly honest, that question both intrigues and terrifies me, for a multitude of reasons. Let’s start with the rookie that has captured the hearts and imagination of Cowboys Nation: Tony Pollard.
Within about 2 hours of the Cowboys drafting Tony in the fourth round of this year’s draft, I was ridiculously excited about the prospects of moving this kid all over the formation, as well as, his special teams’ contributions as a returner, considering he tied the NCAA record with 7 Touchdowns over his 3 year career. While at Memphis, he was used as a backup RB to their main guy Darrell Henderson, as a receiver, and all-over Special Teams (return and coverage units).
Perhaps the central concern regarding Tony potentially starting in Zeke’s stead (should the holdout continue) is that Tony has never truly been used as a Bellcow / 3-down running back that can run in any situations and pass protect / blitz pickup. Can he physically hold-up to the beating all that entails?
I really can’t answer that question and if Tony himself answered the question in the affirmative, I still wouldn’t believe it until I saw it. Furthermore, I think this is really the wrong question. That question suggest the Cowboys should use Pollard as if he is Zeke and in my opinion that would be a very bad idea.
Pollard is not a scat back in the traditional sense, (he possesses scat back ability with the ball in space) however, he’s not built like a Bellcow either. He is somewhere in between. So, while you could possibly convince me that Pollard would be fine for a game or two used in that capacity, subjected to an entire season of that treatment would likely end with Pollard on IR.
If the coaches / front office is expecting a protracted holdout from Zeke, Kellen Moore’s entire mindset of how to approach this offense will need to change. Think – The Greatest Show on Turf. Marshall Faulk (5’10” 211 lbs) is actually a decent comp for Pollard (6’0” 209 lbs). In Faulk’s first year with the St. Louis Rams (1999), he put up a total of 2,429 yards from scrimmage with 1,381 running yards (5.5 yards-per-carry) 1,048 receiving yards, and scoring 12 touchdowns. Faulk joined Roger Craig as the only men to total 1,000 + yards receiving and running in a season.
I am not trying to convince you that Pollard is the next Faulk, but I do think Pollard could be used in a similar way. After all, for a running back, he also runs very crisp routes, has excellent hands and reportedly has a very good head on his shoulders, picking up things very quickly for a rookie. I think Pollard would be up to the task.
Let’s review:
· The Cowboys may have to enter the season without the All-Pro service of Zeke Elliott.
· The Cowboys have in his place a multifaceted talent in Tony Pollard, who is capable of both running between the tackles and running routes like a receiver.
· In consideration of the different type of player Pollard is, Kellen Moore will need to adjust the offense to accommodate his style of play.
· What better way to do that then with the Coryel-style offense implemented by Mike Martz at the turn of the century.
· The Cowboys are already running an offense heavily inspired by Don Coryell, the predominant difference being the run to pass ratio and specifically how the running back is used in both running and passing concepts.
So why did Garrett invite Mike Martz of all people? Did he come to the same conclusion that I have? If the Cowboys have to go into the season and figure out a way to win without Zeke, Jason has to know they can’t use Pollard the same way they would Zeke. Is it possible that Jason sees potential for a rebirth of an aggressive offensive attack that took the league by storm at the turn of the century?
Thoughts?
Last edited by a moderator:

