Woods' Mother of All Mocks - Version 3.0

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
For my 3rd mock draft attempt, my main assumptions continue to be

1. No trades in this version.

2. We do not draft a kicker, but rather go with Buehler, Hughes, or a veteran if neither of the young guns work out.

Also, this draft clearly leans towards offense.


Round 1
M Iupati, OG, Idaho, 6-5 1/2, 330, 5.24 40

I continue to stick with Iupati in Round 1 as I believe that there is a 50/50 chance he drops to 27. It is questionable (at least in my mind) that SF or Pitts takes an OG in the top 20 picks. Can it happen? Sure. But I think that the probability is not particularly high. And from everything that I've read, no one is projecting Iupati to LT in a couple years either.

From the Cowboys perspective, it's well known that OG depth is needed for at least this year - and an eventual starter as early as next year (Kosier) if not earlier.

An OG can he taken later in this Draft, but I believe that Iupati has the potential to be much more than a typical OG prospect. I think that with good coaching he can be a Pro Bowl calibre OG. Finally, Iupati's size and demeanor fits in nicely with the team's OL philosophy (going back to the early 1990s).

Round 2
D McCluster, WR/RB/KR, Miss, 5-8 1/2, 172 lbs, 4.44 40

To me, McCluster represents a "now" and "later" pick. Let me explain. McCluster is a niche player who will get significant reps from Day 1 on STs. He'll be on the active roster early on. He'll also be able to run a few offensive plays - probably designed for his skill set - during a game as well. McCluster is perhaps one of the few players who can help us in a meaningful way from the get-go as a rookie. As McCluster gains more experience over the next couple of years, he can continue to later on add new dimensions to our offense.

McCluster is not going to be our number 2 wideout in 2011 or 2012, but he's the type of player that every team will have to account for on every play - whether he's lining up in the backfield or in the slot.


Round 3
Major Wright, FS, Florida, 6-0, 206 lbs, 4.44 40

He can play centerfield. He's tough. And he will hit. And he's got good range. He can legitimately challenge K Hamlin for the starting spot over the next two years.

I have to admit, I would love to also somehow land D Dickerson from Pitt as well. I just think he would be a nightmare for defenses to cover and would really give our offense yet another dimension and weapon. But having to choose between Wright and Dickerson, and given that I've already picked McCluster in Round 2, I decided to lean towards Wright.

Round 4
Jamar Chaney, ILB, Miss State, 6-1, 242 lbs, 4.5 area 40

Very good speed, athletic, and good size. Has also played some OLB so Chaney offers some versatility. He was starting to show very good production before his 2008 leg injury. Since then, Chaney has shown good production (fully healed) and is starting to come into his own.

Round 6
John "The Terminator" Conner, FB, Kentucky, 5-11, 246, 4.64 40

Traditional fullback who is an explosive and accurate blocker. Athletic enough to hit moving target. Also has soft, reliable hands, and he can pick up tough yards. Conner has extensive STs experience as well.

Cricket may be wearing out his welcome on the Cowboys (off the field issues, etc.) Conner is an athletic blocker (old style), can pick up tough yards when running inside, and he plays very well on STs. Plus, the Cowboys have shown interest in him. Sounds like a potential pick.

Round 7
J Webb, OT, West Texas A&M, 6-7, 335 lbs, 5.29 40

He's got the size, can anchor, and seems to have the talent to mold. Of course, there are off the field questions that the Cowboys have to check out. But if the Cowboys are satisfied after their due diligence, I think Webb could end up being a nice 7th Round find in about 3 years.


Comments appreciated!
 

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
VACowboy;3320856 said:
I'll take it, though Wright's not the best tackler.

I'd love to take M Burnett, but I don't think he will make it past Round 2.
 
Messages
2,023
Reaction score
1
Pretty good, but Chaney won't last till the 4th after his pro day, and I hate Major Wright. But other then that I could live with that. Dickerson somewhere in there would be sick.
 

VACowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,006
Reaction score
3,896
Woods;3320870 said:
I'd love to take M Burnett, but I don't think he will make it past Round 2.

Burnett gets knocked by a lot of folks around here but I'd take him at #59. He's got all the measurables and production to match. Won't surprise me if he sneaks into the first 40 or so.
 

JohnnyHopkins

This is a house of learned doctors
Messages
11,302
Reaction score
3,610
Go with your gut and get Dickerson!!!! Grab Myron Lewis in round four (since Chaney will probably not be there) and wait on ILB until 2011 when Brooking is done and we know what we have with Jason Williams!
 

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
Joe Rod;3320909 said:
Go with your gut and get Dickerson!!!! Grab Myron Lewis in round four (since Chaney will probably not be there) and wait on ILB until 2011 when Brooking is done and we know what we have with Jason Williams!

OK, you've gotten to my sentimental side with that argument. I like M Lewis as well.

Version 4.0 may just go that direction. :)

I just wish we had 1 more draft pick in the top 100-120 picks without losing a top player in the process in Round 1.
 

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
753
Woods;3320783 said:
For my 3rd mock draft attempt, my main assumptions continue to be

1. No trades in this version.

2. We do not draft a kicker, but rather go with Buehler, Hughes, or a veteran if neither of the young guns work out.

Also, this draft clearly leans towards offense.


Round 1
M Iupati, OG, Idaho, 6-5 1/2, 330, 5.24 40

I continue to stick with Iupati in Round 1 as I believe that there is a 50/50 chance he drops to 27. It is questionable (at least in my mind) that SF or Pitts takes an OG in the top 20 picks. Can it happen? Sure. But I think that the probability is not particularly high. And from everything that I've read, no one is projecting Iupati to LT in a couple years either.

From the Cowboys perspective, it's well known that OG depth is needed for at least this year - and an eventual starter as early as next year (Kosier) if not earlier.

An OG can he taken later in this Draft, but I believe that Iupati has the potential to be much more than a typical OG prospect. I think that with good coaching he can be a Pro Bowl calibre OG. Finally, Iupati's size and demeanor fits in nicely with the team's OL philosophy (going back to the early 1990s).

Round 2
D McCluster, WR/RB/KR, Miss, 5-8 1/2, 172 lbs, 4.44 40

To me, McCluster represents a "now" and "later" pick. Let me explain. McCluster is a niche player who will get significant reps from Day 1 on STs. He'll be on the active roster early on. He'll also be able to run a few offensive plays - probably designed for his skill set - during a game as well. McCluster is perhaps one of the few players who can help us in a meaningful way from the get-go as a rookie. As McCluster gains more experience over the next couple of years, he can continue to later on add new dimensions to our offense.

McCluster is not going to be our number 2 wideout in 2011 or 2012, but he's the type of player that every team will have to account for on every play - whether he's lining up in the backfield or in the slot.




Comments appreciated!

good draft buddy;
 

JohnnyHopkins

This is a house of learned doctors
Messages
11,302
Reaction score
3,610
Woods;3320952 said:
OK, you've gotten to my sentimental side with that argument. I like M Lewis as well.

Version 4.0 may just go that direction. :)

I just wish we had 1 more draft pick in the top 100-120 picks without losing a top player in the process in Round 1.

I hear ya, it is almost painful trying to fit all of these players into these picks! I honestly can't do it, so I can only look at what you brave folks have posted! ;)
 

StarHead69

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,731
Reaction score
429
Woods;3320783 said:
Round 1
M Iupati, OG, Idaho, 6-5 1/2, 330, 5.24 40


Round 2
D McCluster, WR/RB/KR, Miss, 5-8 1/2, 172 lbs, 4.44 40


Round 3
D Dickerson, TE and then some, Pitt, 6-1, 220 lbs, 4.40 40

Round 4
M Lewis, FS, Vanderbilt, 6-1, 203 lbs, 4.42 40


Round 6
John "The Terminator" Conner, FB, Kentucky, 5-11, 246, 4.64 40


Round 7
J Webb, OT, West Texas A&M, 6-7, 335 lbs, 5.29 40


Lewis may very well be available in the 4th since safeties can really drop on draft day. This is what your draft could look like if the Cowboys decide that Atogwe is healthy enough to merit a nice contract. Wow! JG would be wearing a perma-grin all pre-season and then some.

You do a good job telling what each player could do for the team.
 

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
noober;3321028 said:
Woods;3320783 said:
Round 1
M Iupati, OG, Idaho, 6-5 1/2, 330, 5.24 40


Round 2
D McCluster, WR/RB/KR, Miss, 5-8 1/2, 172 lbs, 4.44 40


Round 3
D Dickerson, TE and then some, Pitt, 6-1, 220 lbs, 4.40 40

Round 4
M Lewis, FS, Vanderbilt, 6-1, 203 lbs, 4.42 40


Round 6
John "The Terminator" Conner, FB, Kentucky, 5-11, 246, 4.64 40


Round 7
J Webb, OT, West Texas A&M, 6-7, 335 lbs, 5.29 40


Lewis may very well be available in the 4th since safeties can really drop on draft day. This is what your draft could look like if the Cowboys decide that Atogwe is healthy enough to merit a nice contract. Wow! JG would be wearing a perma-grin all pre-season and then some.

You do a good job telling what each player could do for the team.

Yhea, that's a very nice draft, imo. We just need to add one or two decent FAs, or if we had an extra pick in the top 100-120 without losing too much off the top.
 

StarHead69

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,731
Reaction score
429
I just thought of this though...

Iupati replaces Holland
McCluster replaces Hurd?
Dickerson replaces ???
Lewis replaces Watkins
Conner replaces Cricket
Webb replaces Big Red
and
Atogwe replaces Hamlin
That leaves us looking for A replacement for Proctor c/g <- since his presence on the game day roster has got to be just as sickening to Jerry Jones as it is for the fans. Anyone know which UDFA G/C's might be available?
 

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
noober;3321039 said:
I just thought of this though...

Iupati replaces Holland
McCluster replaces Hurd?
Dickerson replaces ???
Lewis replaces Watkins
Conner replaces Cricket
Webb replaces Big Red
and
Atogwe replaces Hamlin
That leaves us looking for A replacement for Proctor c/g <- since his presence on the game day roster has got to be just as sickening to Jerry Jones as it is for the fans. Anyone know which UDFA G/C's might be available?

It appers that they like T Bright quite a bit.

Also, if we only have 1 kicker, that would free up 1 additional roster space for another player.
 

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
L-O-Jete;3321111 said:
But who replaces Proctor???
Please replace Proctor!

maybe T Bright? Though in all likihood Proctor stays for one more year.
 
Messages
2,023
Reaction score
1
noober;3321028 said:
Woods;3320783 said:
Round 1
M Iupati, OG, Idaho, 6-5 1/2, 330, 5.24 40


Round 2
D McCluster, WR/RB/KR, Miss, 5-8 1/2, 172 lbs, 4.44 40


Round 3
D Dickerson, TE and then some, Pitt, 6-1, 220 lbs, 4.40 40

Round 4
M Lewis, FS, Vanderbilt, 6-1, 203 lbs, 4.42 40


Round 6
John "The Terminator" Conner, FB, Kentucky, 5-11, 246, 4.64 40


Round 7
J Webb, OT, West Texas A&M, 6-7, 335 lbs, 5.29 40


Lewis may very well be available in the 4th since safeties can really drop on draft day. This is what your draft could look like if the Cowboys decide that Atogwe is healthy enough to merit a nice contract. Wow! JG would be wearing a perma-grin all pre-season and then some.

You do a good job telling what each player could do for the team.


both Dickerson and Connor would be a waste. Dickerson isn't playing TE, he's more then likely playing FB
 

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
CanuckCowboysFan;3321146 said:
noober;3321028 said:
both Dickerson and Connor would be a waste. Dickerson isn't playing TE, he's more then likely playing FB

i initially thought that, but they give the offense two completely different types of looks on offense.

with conner, he's much more smash mouth football. when we want to play that type of ball for several series in a game, for example.

dickerson gives you a completely different type of look at fb. he's a guy who can block, but you can really move him around and he's esp useful as a receiver around the goal line. i think he's versatile enough you could even line him up in slot.
 
Top