Worst pick of Day 1?
- Thread starter Qwickdraw
- Start date
Rack
Federal Agent
- Messages
- 23,906
- Reaction score
- 3,106
Qwickdraw said:
The only thing that makes it a bad pick is that they already got Santonio Holmes in the first.
But the place he was picked wasn't bad. He's a good return man and has good hands. He started off as a RB at FSU so he has some skills as far as running with the ball.
I was hoping we'd get him in the 4th.
StanleySpadowski
Active Member
- Messages
- 4,815
- Reaction score
- 0
Qwickdraw said:
How can you say someone's a bad pick if you don't know anything about him?
And the Steelers drafted him because he's the best return man in the draft and they lost Randal-El.
BigWillie
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,400
- Reaction score
- 1,142
Does bad pick count in what they gave up to get a certain player?
If so, even with the bias aside, the Commanders by far. Rocky Mcintosh isn't worth trading up to get, plus throwing in your 2nd and 6th this year, plus a 2nd next year as well. Horrible, horrible trade.
As far as pick, I say Whitner as well. Complete reach in the top 10. Sorta reminds me of the Jonathan Sullivan pick out of nowhere by the Saints a few years ago. Just a complete shocker.
If so, even with the bias aside, the Commanders by far. Rocky Mcintosh isn't worth trading up to get, plus throwing in your 2nd and 6th this year, plus a 2nd next year as well. Horrible, horrible trade.
As far as pick, I say Whitner as well. Complete reach in the top 10. Sorta reminds me of the Jonathan Sullivan pick out of nowhere by the Saints a few years ago. Just a complete shocker.
Silver Surfer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,699
- Reaction score
- 7,415
Qwickdraw said:
Given your interest in sleepers, I'm surprised you didn't read the SI article about hidden gems linked on its front page.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/football/nfl/specials/draft/2006/04/28/hidden.gems/1.html
"Attitude is a poor substitute for intelligence"