Irvin88_4life
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,492
- Reaction score
- 26,367
I was saying their first and that.
Rams ain't giving us their first and nick Foles and other picks.
I was saying their first and that.
So give up the number 4 pick for a back up then use round 2 pick on another QB.....haha no thanks
it wasn't my idea, just trying to say what I think he was saying. You are going to either spend money in FA for a back up or use the 1st pick on a QB and make him the back up. Or both. So getting a need filled while picking up 2 additional picks and still getting a QB of the future is not a horrible idea, , I wouldn't do it personally, but again, its not horrible.
Trade down from 1/4.....they give up 1/15...and both of their 2nds.... 2/43 and 2/45.
On paper we are getting the better end of the deal...but you are also risking not getting a QB. Is it worth the risk?
Comments?
I assume that they are trading up for a QB, so I'd consider asking for Foles, a 2nd, and a 4th.
Trade down from 1/4.....they give up 1/15...and both of their 2nds.... 2/43 and 2/45.
On paper we are getting the better end of the deal...but you are also risking not getting a QB. Is it worth the risk?
Comments?
But in this scenerio....I think you are basically saying good bye to drafting a QB.
1/2. Cleveland- Goff
1/4. Rams.-Wentz/Lynch
1/13. Philadelphia- Lynch/Wentz
I hear a lot of people make this deal in a heartbeat.....but I'm not so sure this is the right move.
Foles?
You mean Nick Foles and his 69 QBR?
You mean Nick Foles who had 3 more INTs than TDs this season?
That Nick Foles + a mid 2nd and 4th...........for the number 4 overall pick in the draft?
BAAAAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAAA