WTH: Front Office Personnel Decisions

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
31,279
Reaction score
50,886
Two obvious and egregious personnel decisions come to mind reflecting back on the season (maybe you can think of more):

  1. WR by Committee. This was a total miscalculation by the front office/coaching staff to think this offense could operate without a true no. 1 receiver. They successfully resolved it by acquiring Cooper mid season but in doing so undermined their initial thought process.
  2. Olawale at Fullback. To be clear, Olawale didn’t cost us the season, but his acquisition can only be thought of as a head-scratcher. Olawale has never served as a traditional lead blocking back. I initially rationalized the trade for him thinking he’d be featured as a reciever and safety valve for Dak, as he’s demonstrated some skills in that area. This aspect would presumably make up for what we lost in blocking with Keith Smith. He ended up providing two catches (no rushes) on the year and little as a lead blocker.
 
Two obvious and egregious personnel decisions come to mind reflecting back on the season (maybe you can think of more):

  1. WR by Committee. This was a total miscalculation by the front office/coaching staff to think this offense could operate without a true no. 1 receiver. They successfully resolved it by acquiring Cooper mid season but in doing so undermined their initial thought process.
  2. Olawale at Fullback. To be clear, Olawale didn’t cost us the season, but his acquisition can only be thought of as a head-scratcher. Olawale has never served as a traditional lead blocking back. I initially rationalized the trade for him thinking he’d be featured as a reciever and safety valve for Dak, as he’s demonstrated some skills in that area. This aspect would presumably make up for what we lost in blocking with Keith Smith. He ended up providing two catches (no rushes) on the year and little as a lead blocker.
#1 cost us half the year
 
Two obvious and egregious personnel decisions come to mind reflecting back on the season (maybe you can think of more):

  1. WR by Committee. This was a total miscalculation by the front office/coaching staff to think this offense could operate without a true no. 1 receiver. They successfully resolved it by acquiring Cooper mid season but in doing so undermined their initial thought process.
  2. Olawale at Fullback. To be clear, Olawale didn’t cost us the season, but his acquisition can only be thought of as a head-scratcher. Olawale has never served as a traditional lead blocking back. I initially rationalized the trade for him thinking he’d be featured as a reciever and safety valve for Dak, as he’s demonstrated some skills in that area. This aspect would presumably make up for what we lost in blocking with Keith Smith. He ended up providing two catches (no rushes) on the year and little as a lead blocker.
WR position is fixed. Replace Beez if he is leaving

FB is strange. Not his fault but he is rarely used. Use another TE for blocking.
 
WR by committee? After Watkins decided to go chiefs (smart decision) no other options were left. Ergo, signing Cooper was a most astute move. No complaints. As for olawale, little more than a warm body.
 
I love Cooper, but the guy always looks as if he would rather be somewhere else. I remember hearing when we got him, that some Raiders brass questioned just how much the guy really loves football.
 
Two obvious and egregious personnel decisions come to mind reflecting back on the season (maybe you can think of more):

  1. WR by Committee. This was a total miscalculation by the front office/coaching staff to think this offense could operate without a true no. 1 receiver. They successfully resolved it by acquiring Cooper mid season but in doing so undermined their initial thought process.
  2. Olawale at Fullback. To be clear, Olawale didn’t cost us the season, but his acquisition can only be thought of as a head-scratcher. Olawale has never served as a traditional lead blocking back. I initially rationalized the trade for him thinking he’d be featured as a reciever and safety valve for Dak, as he’s demonstrated some skills in that area. This aspect would presumably make up for what we lost in blocking with Keith Smith. He ended up providing two catches (no rushes) on the year and little as a lead blocker.

Wasting Olawale seems to be on the coaching staff. How about the Switzer-Ward trade?
 
It just shows they don't really have a philosophy or a vision. They are simply winging it every year and hoping for the best.

They fired their OL Coach after 6 games, for crying out loud.

Bam. Another good one I forgot about. That’s exactly my point. The drastic shifts from the initial approach/decisions is odd. I guess props for correcting a mistake but it begs the question as to how they could be so flatly wrong to begin with. The Olawale acquisition is just strange to me because it’s square peg round hole. It’s like trading for Ted Ginn to be your red zone reciever.
 
Don't forget not getting the majority of our starters preseason playing time. That was a head scratcher.
That was one of the worst decisions of the season.

The other was not being prepared for the Witten retirement.

Both staggered the offense and the defense early in the year.
 
We would be better served if we got a competent backup for Zeke, someone who can spell him without causing a major decline in talent level.
Not only that. He wants a new contract early. It would be a good idea to have quality in case he pulls a bell and holds out.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,691
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top