a_minimalist
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,762
- Reaction score
- 193
Anyone here play?
Sam I Am;4584883 said:I can't stand FPS on console. I have BF3 on PC, though I haven't really played since Diablo III came out.
StevenOtero;4585006 said:PC gamers tend to brag that they're better than console gamers at shooters. ....Yeah it's because you use a mouse on the PC. So much easier to point and click to shoot than using the Left/Right stick on a game pad.
Sam I Am;4585026 said:They are better, but it's because the mouse allows you to aim faster. This is why console players are NEVER allowed to play against PC players. It would be a complete and utter rout every time.
It's not that "I'm better" at PC than console for FPS that I play the PC version. I play PC version because playing FPS on console just plain sucks. It's slow as hell. When I see / hear an enemy, I expect to shoot him now, not while I wait for my sights to line up later.
The console feels like I'm driving an RV around compared to playing it on a PC. In comparison, the PC feels like I'm driving a Lotus Elise compared to the console.
I've played both. Console FPS suck and I hate them and will never play a console FPS. They just aren't worth my time when the PC has the same FPS.
a_minimalist;4585033 said:I'm not sure I buy that argument. I hear it all of the time. If you turn up the sensitivity all the way you move pretty damn fast. It's just a lot harder to aim with a controller than a mouse.
But wouldn't you say consoles are more realistic than pc?
Sam I Am;4585050 said:I've played both. It's true.
More realistic? You do realize that PC's graphical powers are far superior to consoles right? The BF3 graphics on PC are far better than BF3 on the consoles.
a_minimalist;4585059 said:And you cranked up the sensitivity all of the way?? I personally think it's easier to use a mouse than coordinate two joysticks.
I know that, I was speaking in terms of movement since you're talking about fast you move. Humans don't move like sports cars.
Yeah, Idk what he meant by more realistic. PC's are miles ahead of consoles due to being able to constantly upgrade the hardware.Sam I Am;4585050 said:I've played both. It's true. When the game companies tested allowing the two to play against each other, the rout was on and that is why they DO NOT play each other online.
More realistic? You do realize that PC's graphical powers are far superior to consoles right? The BF3 graphics on PC are far better than BF3 on the consoles.
StevenOtero;4585081 said:Also, don't forget it's 32 vs 32 on BF3 w/ PC.
Freaking 12 vs 12Sam I Am;4585083 said:What is it on console?
StevenOtero;4585081 said:Yeah, Idk what he meant by more realistic. PC's are miles ahead of consoles due to being able to constantly upgrade the hardware.
Also, don't forget it's 32 vs 32 on BF3 w/ PC.
a_minimalist;4585105 said:I was talking about player speed, I should have been more specific. I'm well aware of the difference in graphics and computer speed compared with consoles.
That's something that I hope changes with consoles in the future. They should allow upgrades to be made on them.
The 32 vs 32 really chaps my ***. That would be so much fun for most maps except metro and bazaar on console.
Sam I Am;4585114 said:Actually, the 64 man metro maps have been quite popular with a lot of people on the PC. I've played it a couple of times. It gets down right crazy!
a_minimalist;4585122 said:yea, it's pretty silly though. it's too crowded and ridiculous. watch this epic video though.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bjTRRnfEC4

Hoofbite;4585466 said:I play.
By far the worst spawn system in TDM I have ever seen and that speaks volumes because MW3 was absolutely disgusting.
That said, I love the game.
I can deal with crappy spawns if the game is great.
a_minimalist;4585502 said:You play with Xbox?
Awesome game but spawns are horrible all around.
