You have to question this teams character

[jr40usa]

With BP last year this team flounder going into December. Now with WP this team is doing the same thing.

I think Big Bill and Wade are pretty good coaches.

At this point I don't believe it is coaching. It all falls on the players to have more pride as pro football players.

Not being a NY Giant fan. You have to take your hat off the way the Giants showed how real professionals play the game no matter what the circumstances are.

Not this team, they seem to look for any excuse not to play hard.

 

[stealth]

so basically we play well when it matters
What a crappy team we are

 

[OldButDeadly]

There seems to be no leadership on this team IMO.

No leaders to get these guys focused. Someone to go up and slap players in the head and say "Get your *#$)R* head in the game"....They should be mad...

Ya Ya...we got nothing to play for....etc....I do not believe this statement. You are always playing for something.

Kevin

 

[OldButDeadly]

so basically we play well when it matters
What a crappy team we are

They have not played well when it mattered for homefield advantage....

Had it not been for crappy Chicago weather....we would not have it.

Kev

 

[SultanOfSix]

I agree. I have doubt in this team's character. I'm a 'Boys fan through and through.

I don't care if this was a meaningless game. I would have preferred two good drives in the first half, and then everyone to the bench. But, we just mailed it in from the beginning and seemingly over December.

The way this team is playing, and notice I said the latter, they will be one and done in the playoffs.

 

[newlander]

and something I've been saying about the leadership since the Lions game. We might win 1 game in the playoffs, but that's it. It's like swallowing CRAP TO ADMIT THAT Favre and G.Bay will smoke us. Not because they're better: but they have leadership and better coaching IMO. :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: :bang2:

 

[Dangerous Dave]

Stealth is right. The rest of you are clueless.

 

[newlander]

Maybe so, D.Dave.........I'd love to be wrong.....but I don't think so. Let's say you're right and we DO get to the super bowl: how do we stack up against N.England after what you've seen the last 4 wks.? Uh-huh...thought so.

 

[windward]

They have not played well when it mattered for homefield advantage....

Had it not been for crappy Chicago weather....we would not have it.

Kev

So the Pack can have excuses but we can't? Nice balanced analysis, there.

 

[hvgill]

I guess you'll have to question Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Seattle and Tampa Bay's character as well today. You might have to question Indy's character tonight as well.

 

[Dangerous Dave]

Maybe so, D.Dave.........I'd love to be wrong.....but I don't think so. Let's say you're right and we DO get to the super bowl: how do we stack up against N.England after what you've seen the last 4 wks.? Uh-huh...thought so.

We stack up pretty well, chicken little.

The cheats were REALLY impressive the last few weeks, especially against the
5-11 ravens and 4-12 NY Jets. Impressive......

 

[OldButDeadly]

So the Pack can have excuses but we can't? Nice balanced analysis, there.

I feel you there...but when you throw the ball in the air and it moves 5 yards with the wind....geez...that is some crappy weather....

Well....hope we can get hungry again....Turn that switch on....

 

[Kevinicus]

I feel you there...but when you throw the ball in the air and it moves 5 yards with the wind....geez...that is some crappy weather....

Well....hope we can get hungry again....Turn that switch on....

Chicago seemed to handle it ok...so what's your point?

 

[Achozen]

I wish we had Ray Lewis on our team.

 

[LandryFan]

Maybe so, D.Dave.........I'd love to be wrong.....but I don't think so. Let's say you're right and we DO get to the super bowl: how do we stack up against N.England after what you've seen the last 4 wks.? Uh-huh...thought so.

Not saying we will, but if we get to the SB, we will have to have beaten two good teams to get there. In that case, the swagger would be back.