Young Giants' receivers better be ready to replace Plaxico Burress, Amani Toomer

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,639
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Originally Published: June 20, 2009
Big Opportunity, With A Catch: Pressure

Young Giants' receivers better be ready to replace Plaxico Burress, Amani Toomer

By Jeffri Chadiha
ESPN.com

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. -- The New York Giants' wide receivers know what they'll be facing this season. There will be doubters and haters, skeptics and cynics, and people who will wait to see just how this offense functions without veteran free agents Plaxico Burress and Amani Toomer.

Their replacements realize they have much to prove. They see that their development is vital to the Giants' chances of staying on top of the NFC East.


NFC East blog

ESPN.com's Matt Mosley writes about all things NFC East in his division blog.

• Blog network: NFL Nation

But here's the first thing the youngsters have going for them: diversity. While Burress was the top target and Toomer served as a dependable second option, this year's targets offer a variety of eager weapons for quarterback Eli Manning. They have size (Domenik Hixon and Hakeem Nicks), quickness (Steve Smith and Mario Manningham) and speed (Sinorice Moss).

Now they just need to become consistent performers when the games start counting. That's what everybody around the Giants realizes. And it's that responsibility that has provided ample motivation for these players.

"I feel like there is a big chip on our shoulders because you hear a lot of things," Moss said. "[You hear people saying,] 'They don't have Plax. They don't have Amani. So these guys may not do this.'

"We have Domenik Hixon, Steve Smith, myself, Mario Manningham. I can go down the list of guys that we have who can contribute. So as a group, we look at each other and say, 'Let's go do what we have to do to help this team.'"


Nobody is saying the Giants lack talent at the position. Of the players competing for time this offseason, four were first-day draft picks. The team selected former University of North Carolina star Nicks with the 29th overall pick in the 2009 draft. Moss (2006) and Smith (2007) were second-rounders. Manningham was taken in the third round last year. When you stockpile that many receivers, you expect to see a return on those investments sooner rather than later.

The real problem facing these receivers is mostly perception. People know what Burress did for the Giants before his off-the-field issues -- he's still dealing with charges of illegally possessing a firearm last November -- led the team to release him earlier this offseason. He's the oversized target who made life much easier for Manning. He was the team's leading receiver for three of his four seasons in New York. And when the Giants pulled that dramatic upset over the New England Patriots in Super Bowl XLII, it was Burress who caught the winning touchdown pass from Manning.

The Giants initially gave some indication that they could thrive without Burress, as they finished 12-4 despite his suspension for the final four games of last season. But then they sorely missed his playmaking ability in an upset playoff loss to Philadelphia Eagles.

Even Smith acknowledges that life was smoother when Burress was available.

"I definitely felt better when Plax was on the field with us," Smith said. "But after going through last year with some of the guys we have here, I'm pretty sure we can still make the plays when it matters."


One reason to be optimistic about the development of the Giants' receivers is timing. When Burress became a constant problem for the team last season, the Giants' coaches had to ask more of less-experienced players. Now those same coaches can spend more time focusing on how best to use the remaining receivers. Instead of primarily expecting Burress -- and Toomer -- to be reliable, they're able to see just how much they should be asking of the members of this group.

It might sound like a small difference, but the players believe it's significant.

"The time we've had to work together this offseason is basically like a head start on this year," Hixon said. "The coaches can see what we all do well and they're designing routes that work for us. Last year it was mainly about what Plaxico did well. But we're all showing what we can do now."

The biggest change in the Giants' passing game will be the absence of Burress' size. (He's 6-5 and 232 pounds.) That long, sturdy frame gave Manning far more confidence to make throws when Burress looked to be covered. Aside from Hixon (6-2, 182) and Nicks (6-1, 212), the rest of the top receivers are shorter targets. That means they'll have to thrive with disciplined routes and shifty moves to create the separation that Manning will need to complete passes.

At the moment, Smith and Hixon are the best of the bunch. Smith is the most experienced receiver on the roster, as he made some clutch receptions during the Giants' Super Bowl run and caught 57 passes while serving mainly as a third receiver last season. Hixon was the man who stepped into Burress' shoes when Burress became a headache in the fall. He caught 43 passes in seven starts but was noticeably quiet (two receptions for 37 yards) in that playoff loss to Philadelphia.

Moss actually had been the most impressive receiver during this offseason until a hamstring injury sidelined him earlier this week. The Giants also like what they've seen from Manningham, who has turned heads with his flair for the acrobatic catch. Nicks is already scoring points in the chemistry department. When the receivers were contemplating going to dinner last weekend, he quickly volunteered to treat them to steaks at Del Frisco's in Manhattan.

It's that kind of chemistry that could be the secret weapon of this group. But again, unity and potential don't mean anything unless they lead to results on Sundays.

"The big step when we go for real," said Giants offensive coordinator Kevin Gilbride, "is whether they're going to continue to do the things that right now it seems like they can do."

That is a question that the Giants' receivers are looking forward to answering.

Senior writer Jeffri Chadiha covers the NFL for ESPN.com.
 

Bluefin

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,209
Reaction score
9,677
Jeffri Chadiha said:
The Giants initially gave some indication that they could thrive without Burress, as they finished 12-4 despite his suspension for the final four games of last season. But then they sorely missed his playmaking ability in an upset playoff loss to Philadelphia Eagles.

The Giants were 1-3 without Palxico Burress in those four December games before losing at home in the divisional round.

How can that possibly be attributed as some indication that they could thrive without Plax?

Would it have only been troubling in they went 0-4 in December before losing their home playoff game as the NFC's top seed?

Eli Manning was the top passer in any of the 5 games without Burress. In fact, Eli failed to eclipse 200 passing yards in any of the game while totaling only 2 touchdowns against 4 interceptions.

That is some indication all right, just not what the writer was going for.

Eli Manning was not the top passer in any of the 5 game minus Plax. In fact, Manning failed to eclipse 200 passing yards a single time while having only 2 total touchdowns against 4 interceptions.

That's some indication all right, just not what the writer wants it to be.
 

Aikbach

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,746
Reaction score
42
Why are they super bowl favorites again?

Hixon, Smith, Boss, Jacobs and Bradshaw are indicative of their "firepower"?
 

jgboys1

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,290
Reaction score
3,103
To borrow a phrase from Artie Lang.......... **** THE GIANTS!
 

guag

Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01
Messages
21,173
Reaction score
18,170
jgboys1;2818239 said:
To borrow a phrase from Artie Lang.......... **** THE GIANTS!

LOL @ your sig jg... well we've got plenty of those on Long Island too you know. :banghead:
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,865
Reaction score
11,566
Bluefin;2818222 said:
The Giants were 1-3 without Palxico Burress in those four December games before losing at home in the divisional round.

How can that possibly be attributed as some indication that they could thrive without Plax?

Would it have only been troubling in they went 0-4 in December before losing their home playoff game as the NFC's top seed?

Eli Manning was the top passer in any of the 5 games without Burress. In fact, Eli failed to eclipse 200 passing yards in any of the game while totaling only 2 touchdowns against 4 interceptions.

That is some indication all right, just not what the writer was going for.

Eli Manning was not the top passer in any of the 5 game minus Plax. In fact, Manning failed to eclipse 200 passing yards a single time while having only 2 total touchdowns against 4 interceptions.

That's some indication all right, just not what the writer wants it to be.

To be fair, losing a guy midseason is a little different than having a whole offseason to prepare for his absence.
 

BIGDen

Dr. Freakasaurus
Messages
4,767
Reaction score
902
guag;2818298 said:
LOL @ your sig jg... well we've got plenty of those on Long Island too you know. :banghead:

and Staten Island, Brooklyn, Queens etc....
There are actually more of those kinds of guys in NY. I've lived in both states.
 

Bungarian

Butt Monkey
Messages
3,141
Reaction score
1,272
According to Mosely the Giant receivers are much better than the Cowboys.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
I think we have more talent at WR and frankly both Roy and Crayton are proven talents. Austin, Hurd and the other guys are the question marks. We also have all World Witten and a very promising guy named Bennett at TE, which for some reason keeps getting left out when you are talking receivers.
 

jgboys1

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,290
Reaction score
3,103
BIGDen;2818379 said:
and Staten Island, Brooklyn, Queens etc....
There are actually more of those kinds of guys in NY. I've lived in both states.
You are right.... sad to say.
 

Vinnie2u

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,817
Reaction score
11,269
Giants Have lost alot of fire power in the last 3 years... Tiki, Shockey, Plax, Toomer and Ward.. You got to give it to them they run a good organization...
 

Established1971

fiveandcounting
Messages
5,800
Reaction score
4,322
jgboys1;2818239 said:
To borrow a phrase from Artie Lang.......... **** THE GIANTS!

Lol at your photo. I drove out to see the Jets practice recently. Im not a fan but hey it was free. All I could think was how New Jersey has to be the ugliest state in the US.
 

Bluefin

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,209
Reaction score
9,677
Bungarian;2818382 said:
According to Mosely the Giant receivers are much better than the Cowboys.

I've no doubt Matthew will be repeatedly reminded of that during this season.
 

DBOY3141

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,340
Reaction score
5,956
Hoofbite;2818310 said:
To be fair, losing a guy midseason is a little different than having a whole offseason to prepare for his absence.


You would think that Romo and Williams would get some sort of a bye on this topic as well. Since they only played in 6 games together and really couldn't practice because of Williams injury. But we'll have to wait till the season to see how it turns out.

I think the Giants are way overrated this year, I think they are going to have a tough time scoring points.
 

Bluefin

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,209
Reaction score
9,677
Hoofbite;2818310 said:
To be fair, losing a guy midseason is a little different than having a whole offseason to prepare for his absence.

That is fair.

I'm just objecting to the writer claiming the Giants showed some indication of being able to flourish with Plaxico Burress by highlighting they finished with a 12-4 record.

The Giants were 11-1 with Plax and closed the season with a 1-3 December whimper before getting thumped in their divisional playoff home opener.

Winning one out of five games is not an indication of being able to flourish.

It says you are struggling without your lead receiver being in the mix.
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
Based solely on their wide receivers, I rate the NFC East teams as follows:

1) Eagles
2) Cowboys
3) Commanders
4) Giants

For all the adulation that some give Santana Moss, his yearly averages are virtually identical to Roy Williams. Williams is younger, however, so he gets the nod. Patrick Crayton and Antwan Randal El are a wash, in my opinion.

The Eagles are ranked highest based on the potential of Desean Jackson.

When both receivers and tight ends are considered, my rankings are adjusted as follows:

1) Cowboys
2) Eagles
3) Commanders
4) Giants

Jason Witten is, by a wide margin, the best tight end in the NFC East.
 
Top