CouchCoach
Staff member
- Messages
- 41,122
- Reaction score
- 74,970
I was never in favor of hiring Linehan but it's very easy just to start blaming play calling without considering the two critical elements, talent and execution.
I've got a lot of respect for the football minds here, when not blinded by anger, and would like to know how you might have called that game differently and how you would move forward.
I watched the replay of that game and it became apparent from the beginning the QB, OL, RB and receivers were not in sync and I don't know what an OC calls at that point. They're stacking against what you want to do and your QB/receivers can't back them off. And your OL and RB are not in sync either.
What do you call when your offense is not executing in either phase and the one thing you thought you could count on, the OL, is a shadow of it's prior self.
You saw how the QB executed the pass plays, you saw how the receivers ran their routes and did you happen to notice what they did when the QB was under pressure? Basically, nothing.
I am really interested to know how y'all would call this differently and no fair changing the cast out, you are stuck with just what you saw.
The other rule. No fair going back to a poorly executed play to replace that with something else because Linehan would gladly do that. When I watched the game again, I watched for one thing, execution and if you get the chance, you might want to do the same. It was not play calling that lost that game.
Look, I am not defending a coach that I didn't even want but is it fair to assume that the Cowboys have a talent challenge now on offense that Bill Walsh couldn't call his way out of? You have a team with a QB that struggled in the last half of the season, he loses his WR1 and TE and you get what to replace them? Are you seriously expecting him to elevate these players like Brady and Rodgers?
I've got a lot of respect for the football minds here, when not blinded by anger, and would like to know how you might have called that game differently and how you would move forward.
I watched the replay of that game and it became apparent from the beginning the QB, OL, RB and receivers were not in sync and I don't know what an OC calls at that point. They're stacking against what you want to do and your QB/receivers can't back them off. And your OL and RB are not in sync either.
What do you call when your offense is not executing in either phase and the one thing you thought you could count on, the OL, is a shadow of it's prior self.
You saw how the QB executed the pass plays, you saw how the receivers ran their routes and did you happen to notice what they did when the QB was under pressure? Basically, nothing.
I am really interested to know how y'all would call this differently and no fair changing the cast out, you are stuck with just what you saw.
The other rule. No fair going back to a poorly executed play to replace that with something else because Linehan would gladly do that. When I watched the game again, I watched for one thing, execution and if you get the chance, you might want to do the same. It was not play calling that lost that game.
Look, I am not defending a coach that I didn't even want but is it fair to assume that the Cowboys have a talent challenge now on offense that Bill Walsh couldn't call his way out of? You have a team with a QB that struggled in the last half of the season, he loses his WR1 and TE and you get what to replace them? Are you seriously expecting him to elevate these players like Brady and Rodgers?
