YR's My Meaningless Thoughts On The Bears Game...

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
- The Cowboys offense needs to either stop using the shotgun so much on 1st and 2nd downs, run more from the shotgun or both. Like I said here a few times, against the Commanders the Cowboys used the shotgun 37% of the 1st or 2nd downs they had. They only ran the ball twice on 2nd down, so the Commanders knew that shotgun = pass and their pass rushers could go full bore at Romo with no threat of a run. If anything, Garrett needs to understand how to keep defenses honest to some degree much more often throughout the game.

- There’s been talk of Garrett ‘missing Sparano’ along with the lack of points the team scored (7) vs. the yards gained (377). So I did some research on a statistic we’ll call ‘points per yards gained’ (points scored / yards gained). First, this has a pretty strong correlation to winning and losing in the NFL (correlation coefficient of +0.75 over the past 4 seasons). In ’07 (with Sparano and Garrett), the Cowboys finished 4th in PPYG. In 2008 they finished 21st. In 2009, 25th. Since the correlation is statistically very strong, what that means is that had the offense been stronger in this statistic in ’08 or ’09, they would’ve likely won more games those seasons and it could plague us again this season. Now, part of this statistic is influenced by the FG kicking, but remember that Folk was kicking well in ’08 and the team still finished 21st that year.

- We need to get some picks in this game. I wasn’t too worried about the lack of interceptions against the Skins because there wasn’t a lot of opportunity for it and McNabb has a low rate of INT’s per pass attempt in his career. McNabb averages 1 pick per 47.78 pass attempts in his career. However, Cutler isn’t nearly as good with a career average of 1 pick per 28.28 pass attempts. INT’s, particularly from the safeties, have been a problem the past 2 seasons and they are in a position where I’ll believe they can do it when I see it. But this game should net some INT’s.

- Don’t expect fumbles from the Bears since they had some issues with fumbles last week and they will probably focus on protecting the football this week.

- I wouldn’t be too surprised to see Martz really run the ball this game as the ’07 Lions did under his command against the Cowboys that year which really shocked the defense.

- I completely disagree that the Brooking blitzes up the middle were not effective. They penetrate the A gap which throws inside runs out of what and flushed McNabb out of the pocket. I wouldn’t call for them if they need a big play, but they were effective nonetheless. The issue I have with them is that Brooking can take a beating with those blitzes and he’s the 4th oldest Linebacker in the league and our ILB depth isn’t very good right now.

- I re-watched the game a bit and on that Marion Barber pass I think Witten did a poor job of slipping out and going downfield. I think people are way too down on that play (and I’ve been as critical of Garrett as anybody). This team needs to use some more trick plays from time to time when the offense is sputtering and it resulted in an incomplete pass that had no chance of being intercepted. I don’t see a difference in doing that versus Romo dropping back and throwing one away.

- I think if Beuhler miss chip shots in this game, they must start looking for a place kicker. And I think they will because the money isn’t guaranteed after week 2 and they’ll be getting healthier by then.

- If there’s a silver lining about the Garrett problems it’s that I have a gut feeling that Jerry isn’t very happy with Garrett right now. Wade wouldn’t say ‘I need to interject more’ on the offense unless Jerry was okay with it and hearing Jerry talk he still talks about how great Wade is, but you don’t hear much of that in regards to Garrett. Plus, Jerry has said he wants Felix starting and Barber as the ‘closer’, but Garrett wants the opposite and I think he’s a bit unhappy with Felix still not getting enough touches. Of course, people will say ‘who would you replace Garrett with?’ My answer would be Rob Chudzinski.

Chudzinski was the Browns O-Coordinator for 2 years (07-08). In his first year he took the awful Browns offense and made it one of the best in the league with Derrick freaking Anderson, Jamal Lewis, Braylon Edwards and a rookie at left tackle. In his second year they struggled, but still better than what they were before he got there. He was a sharp, thinking outside the box O-Coordinator who wasn’t afraid to run the ball and saw Lewis have his 2nd best year of his career when everybody thought he was done with at the age of 28 years old. He’s now the TE coach for the Chargers, which means he’s worked under Norv Turner and his offensive philosophy.

- I think the Cowboys win here, but it will be closer than people think. I think Cutler will have a good game, just a hunch, and that will keep the Bears in the game. I think Garrett will certainly run the ball, but go in the opposite direction this game and overdo it and just aggravate us some more.




YR
 
With both Kyle Kozier and Marc Colombo in the offensive line, there will be an immediate ability to run the ball better. Since there is more of an H-back for this game, I think the tight ends will be used more to chip at the Bear defensive ends. This could allow Felix Jones to go off tackle and out of the reach and speed of Urhlacher. It could also tax their linebackers and a somewhat suspect secondary in coverage of those same tight ends and backs of Dallas. Again, play action could well provide time for double moves and the deep ball as well.
 
CCBoy;3563767 said:
Again, play action could well provide time for double moves and the deep ball as well.

Problem is that Garrett isn't a play action guy.

If I was a D-Coordinator against the Cowboys, I'd try to set it up so the Cowboys have to be in a position where their big plays would come from play action. Force them to beat you with being patient and running the ball and then I'll creep up the safeties a bit to help out with the run and see if Garrett has the guts to stick with the run to set up play action for the big play. My guess is he doesn't.





YR
 
Yakuza Rich;3563724 said:
- The Cowboys offense needs to either stop using the shotgun so much on 1st and 2nd downs, run more from the shotgun or both. Like I said here a few times, against the Commanders the Cowboys used the shotgun 37% of the 1st or 2nd downs they had. They only ran the ball twice on 2nd down, so the Commanders knew that shotgun = pass and their pass rushers could go full bore at Romo with no threat of a run. If anything, Garrett needs to understand how to keep defenses honest to some degree much more often throughout the game.

- There’s been talk of Garrett ‘missing Sparano’ along with the lack of points the team scored (7) vs. the yards gained (377). So I did some research on a statistic we’ll call ‘points per yards gained’ (points scored / yards gained). First, this has a pretty strong correlation to winning and losing in the NFL (correlation coefficient of +0.75 over the past 4 seasons). In ’07 (with Sparano and Garrett), the Cowboys finished 4th in PPYG. In 2008 they finished 21st. In 2009, 25th. Since the correlation is statistically very strong, what that means is that had the offense been stronger in this statistic in ’08 or ’09, they would’ve likely won more games those seasons and it could plague us again this season. Now, part of this statistic is influenced by the FG kicking, but remember that Folk was kicking well in ’08 and the team still finished 21st that year.

- We need to get some picks in this game. I wasn’t too worried about the lack of interceptions against the Skins because there wasn’t a lot of opportunity for it and McNabb has a low rate of INT’s per pass attempt in his career. McNabb averages 1 pick per 47.78 pass attempts in his career. However, Cutler isn’t nearly as good with a career average of 1 pick per 28.28 pass attempts. INT’s, particularly from the safeties, have been a problem the past 2 seasons and they are in a position where I’ll believe they can do it when I see it. But this game should net some INT’s.

- Don’t expect fumbles from the Bears since they had some issues with fumbles last week and they will probably focus on protecting the football this week.

- I wouldn’t be too surprised to see Martz really run the ball this game as the ’07 Lions did under his command against the Cowboys that year which really shocked the defense.

- I completely disagree that the Brooking blitzes up the middle were not effective. They penetrate the A gap which throws inside runs out of what and flushed McNabb out of the pocket. I wouldn’t call for them if they need a big play, but they were effective nonetheless. The issue I have with them is that Brooking can take a beating with those blitzes and he’s the 4th oldest Linebacker in the league and our ILB depth isn’t very good right now.

- I re-watched the game a bit and on that Marion Barber pass I think Witten did a poor job of slipping out and going downfield. I think people are way too down on that play (and I’ve been as critical of Garrett as anybody). This team needs to use some more trick plays from time to time when the offense is sputtering and it resulted in an incomplete pass that had no chance of being intercepted. I don’t see a difference in doing that versus Romo dropping back and throwing one away.

- I think if Beuhler miss chip shots in this game, they must start looking for a place kicker. And I think they will because the money isn’t guaranteed after week 2 and they’ll be getting healthier by then.

- If there’s a silver lining about the Garrett problems it’s that I have a gut feeling that Jerry isn’t very happy with Garrett right now. Wade wouldn’t say ‘I need to interject more’ on the offense unless Jerry was okay with it and hearing Jerry talk he still talks about how great Wade is, but you don’t hear much of that in regards to Garrett. Plus, Jerry has said he wants Felix starting and Barber as the ‘closer’, but Garrett wants the opposite and I think he’s a bit unhappy with Felix still not getting enough touches. Of course, people will say ‘who would you replace Garrett with?’ My answer would be Rob Chudzinski.

Chudzinski was the Browns O-Coordinator for 2 years (07-08). In his first year he took the awful Browns offense and made it one of the best in the league with Derrick freaking Anderson, Jamal Lewis, Braylon Edwards and a rookie at left tackle. In his second year they struggled, but still better than what they were before he got there. He was a sharp, thinking outside the box O-Coordinator who wasn’t afraid to run the ball and saw Lewis have his 2nd best year of his career when everybody thought he was done with at the age of 28 years old. He’s now the TE coach for the Chargers, which means he’s worked under Norv Turner and his offensive philosophy.

- I think the Cowboys win here, but it will be closer than people think. I think Cutler will have a good game, just a hunch, and that will keep the Bears in the game. I think Garrett will certainly run the ball, but go in the opposite direction this game and overdo it and just aggravate us some more.




YR

Great post.

I brought up a similar issue abouts points per yard the other day.

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=192338

I have issues with JG too on how he runs this offense. I hope it turns around for us.
 
I'm hoping with the regular line back together, or at least without Baron von Holding on the line we will be able to get back to Cowboys football. Time of possession and ground game em to death.
 
Yakuza Rich;3563805 said:
Problem is that Garrett isn't a play action guy.

If I was a D-Coordinator against the Cowboys, I'd try to set it up so the Cowboys have to be in a position where their big plays would come from play action. Force them to beat you with being patient and running the ball and then I'll creep up the safeties a bit to help out with the run and see if Garrett has the guts to stick with the run to set up play action for the big play. My guess is he doesn't.





YR

There already is the natural tendency away from a double tight end and running formation, due to a lack in numbers and dept at tight end. Then the large number of quality receivers to put onto the field as well. This doesn't take away from running advantages that exist whether in the shotgun or other formations that will present themselves during a game. The personnel advantages in skill positions will do the same stretching to that Bear's defense, especially given their somewhat soft secondary. That stated, with Kyle Kozier and Marc Colombo in the mix, both pass protections and running outside ability increases tremendously. If a team doesn't respect you and plays in, which will be revealed during play in the first half...then you defeat where that team is weak. Up the seams and running off tackles. That can still be done in the formation of choice by Garrett.

I would question whether there was a lack of calling plays involved and reflected by the stats, however attractive they appear in anatomical comparisons. I would have to question executions in and near the Red Zone and penalty tendencies of players that are second striners or no longer on the team's offensive line.
 
Yakuza Rich;3563724 said:
- If there’s a silver lining about the Garrett problems it’s that I have a gut feeling that Jerry isn’t very happy with Garrett right now. Wade wouldn’t say ‘I need to interject more’ on the offense unless Jerry was okay with it and hearing Jerry talk he still talks about how great Wade is, but you don’t hear much of that in regards to Garrett. Plus, Jerry has said he wants Felix starting and Barber as the ‘closer’, but Garrett wants the opposite and I think he’s a bit unhappy with Felix still not getting enough touches. Of course, people will say ‘who would you replace Garrett with?’ My answer would be Rob Chudzinski.

Where are these comments from Jerry and Wade saying he needs to interject more for you to make these assumptions, just as a side note. I'd like to read them and make my bloody hell day....
 
BTW, for those that argue our run game will be better with COlumbo and Kosier in the line-up, our running game was doing just fine... It was the inability by the OC to continue with it, that cost us the game...
 
khiladi;3563905 said:
Where are these comments from Jerry and Wade saying he needs to interject more for you to make these assumptions, just as a side note. I'd like to read them and make my bloody hell day....

http://www.***BANNED-URL***/sharedcontent/dws/spt/stories/091410dnspocowinsider.2cbb1f4.html

"I need to interject more and I didn't do it," Phillips said. "That was the problem."






YR
 
Ashwynn;3563826 said:
I'm hoping with the regular line back together, or at least without Baron von Holding on the line we will be able to get back to Cowboys football. Time of possession and ground game em to death.

I didn't focus on Barron the entire game, but his run blocking looked pretty good to me. His pass protection on the other hand....





YR
 
Thanks... BUt the impression that the author tries to create from the following is pretty far-off in my opinion:

But the two talk during the week in putting together the offensive game plan. It's vetted by Phillips. The two communicate during the game about what is happening and what needs to be done.

Phillips doesn't call specific plays. But he will tell Garrett that he wants to speed the game up or slow it down. He will tell his offensive coordinator when he wants to run certain personnel groups, go with a no-huddle offense or go for it on fourth down.

That speaks to strategy. That is always Phillips' call. He's in charge, even though some like to paint that he's not.

Of course Wade is going to have some knowledge of the offensive game-plan and communicate with Garrett. Imagine a HC having no idea what he offense intends to do. That doesn't mean he is in charge of the offense.
 
Yakuza Rich;3563919 said:
I didn't focus on Barron the entire game, but his run blocking looked pretty good to me. His pass protection on the other hand....

Exactly... I don't know how anybody can ignore that fact...
 
khiladi;3563930 said:
Thanks... BUt the impression that the author tries to create from the following is pretty far-off in my opinion:

I agree with you. This stuff of the 'unique hierarchy' is rubbish. This is somewhat common in the NFL. Hell, Dick Vermeil is an offensive minded coach, brought up thru as an offensive assistant, and even he gave pretty much full autonomy to Martz and then Saunders to the playcalling on offense and it worked quite well for him.

I think somebody like Vermeil or a Belichick basically gives autonomy to the coordinators and 'interjects' from time to time to say 'hey, I think we need to run more' or 'we need to use less shotgun' or 'I think we can attack this corner if we can get him one-on-one.'

Jerry has been pretty protective of Garrett since he hired him, but now I see him not protecting him much and me thinks that he wants to see substantial improvement this year.




YR
 
Good post YR.

I agree with some of your points, I disagree with others.

But you're already 10x better than other posters because you actually provide a name and a reason to replace Garrett. I don't agree with it, but at least you're not just pissing and moaning. You give an alternative.

Your PPYG stat is a very nice one. Good find. I will be keeping an eye on that for sure.

If this offensive line can block without us giving it tons of help, I think we will score some points this game, and this year in general. Like we've all said from day one, it's all up to the offensive line this year.
 
Yakuza Rich;3563724 said:
- The Cowboys offense needs to either stop using the shotgun so much on 1st and 2nd downs, run more from the shotgun or both. Like I said here a few times, against the Commanders the Cowboys used the shotgun 37% of the 1st or 2nd downs they had. They only ran the ball twice on 2nd down, so the Commanders knew that shotgun = pass and their pass rushers could go full bore at Romo with no threat of a run. If anything, Garrett needs to understand how to keep defenses honest to some degree much more often throughout the game.

- There’s been talk of Garrett ‘missing Sparano’ along with the lack of points the team scored (7) vs. the yards gained (377). So I did some research on a statistic we’ll call ‘points per yards gained’ (points scored / yards gained). First, this has a pretty strong correlation to winning and losing in the NFL (correlation coefficient of +0.75 over the past 4 seasons). In ’07 (with Sparano and Garrett), the Cowboys finished 4th in PPYG. In 2008 they finished 21st. In 2009, 25th. Since the correlation is statistically very strong, what that means is that had the offense been stronger in this statistic in ’08 or ’09, they would’ve likely won more games those seasons and it could plague us again this season. Now, part of this statistic is influenced by the FG kicking, but remember that Folk was kicking well in ’08 and the team still finished 21st that year.

- We need to get some picks in this game. I wasn’t too worried about the lack of interceptions against the Skins because there wasn’t a lot of opportunity for it and McNabb has a low rate of INT’s per pass attempt in his career. McNabb averages 1 pick per 47.78 pass attempts in his career. However, Cutler isn’t nearly as good with a career average of 1 pick per 28.28 pass attempts. INT’s, particularly from the safeties, have been a problem the past 2 seasons and they are in a position where I’ll believe they can do it when I see it. But this game should net some INT’s.

- Don’t expect fumbles from the Bears since they had some issues with fumbles last week and they will probably focus on protecting the football this week.

- I wouldn’t be too surprised to see Martz really run the ball this game as the ’07 Lions did under his command against the Cowboys that year which really shocked the defense.

- I completely disagree that the Brooking blitzes up the middle were not effective. They penetrate the A gap which throws inside runs out of what and flushed McNabb out of the pocket. I wouldn’t call for them if they need a big play, but they were effective nonetheless. The issue I have with them is that Brooking can take a beating with those blitzes and he’s the 4th oldest Linebacker in the league and our ILB depth isn’t very good right now.

- I re-watched the game a bit and on that Marion Barber pass I think Witten did a poor job of slipping out and going downfield. I think people are way too down on that play (and I’ve been as critical of Garrett as anybody). This team needs to use some more trick plays from time to time when the offense is sputtering and it resulted in an incomplete pass that had no chance of being intercepted. I don’t see a difference in doing that versus Romo dropping back and throwing one away.

- I think if Beuhler miss chip shots in this game, they must start looking for a place kicker. And I think they will because the money isn’t guaranteed after week 2 and they’ll be getting healthier by then.

- If there’s a silver lining about the Garrett problems it’s that I have a gut feeling that Jerry isn’t very happy with Garrett right now. Wade wouldn’t say ‘I need to interject more’ on the offense unless Jerry was okay with it and hearing Jerry talk he still talks about how great Wade is, but you don’t hear much of that in regards to Garrett. Plus, Jerry has said he wants Felix starting and Barber as the ‘closer’, but Garrett wants the opposite and I think he’s a bit unhappy with Felix still not getting enough touches. Of course, people will say ‘who would you replace Garrett with?’ My answer would be Rob Chudzinski.

Chudzinski was the Browns O-Coordinator for 2 years (07-08). In his first year he took the awful Browns offense and made it one of the best in the league with Derrick freaking Anderson, Jamal Lewis, Braylon Edwards and a rookie at left tackle. In his second year they struggled, but still better than what they were before he got there. He was a sharp, thinking outside the box O-Coordinator who wasn’t afraid to run the ball and saw Lewis have his 2nd best year of his career when everybody thought he was done with at the age of 28 years old. He’s now the TE coach for the Chargers, which means he’s worked under Norv Turner and his offensive philosophy.

- I think the Cowboys win here, but it will be closer than people think. I think Cutler will have a good game, just a hunch, and that will keep the Bears in the game. I think Garrett will certainly run the ball, but go in the opposite direction this game and overdo it and just aggravate us some more.




YR
Well, with what's going on in Miami, Sporano could be hired back with the team at years end. Parcell's already jumped ship. :p:
 
Good post.

We should keep track of what the Cowboys points to 100 yards percentage is.

Last week the Cowboys only scored 26% of the points they should have based on the idea of you should score 7 points for every 100 yards of offense.

The Math: (Points Scored / (7pts * 1.00 yards)) = Scoring Efficiency

So 7 * 3.77 = 26.39 points should have been scored in an efficient offense. We scored 7, so (7 / 26.39) = 26.5% was the Cowboys scoring efficiency. (obviously that is pretty bad) Since defensive TDs do happen and sometimes offense doesn't score, I will take all points into consideration and make it a team scoring and consider it a team scoring efficiency. (obviously you can break it down for just offensive if you like)

To add more interest, I will add some other teams numbers to this post.

  • Green Bay: 27pts, 299 yards (129%) (Won vs Eagles)
  • Eagles: 20pts, 320 yards (89.2%) (Lost to Green Bay)
  • Vikings: 9 pts, 253 yards (50.8%) (Lost to Saints)
  • Saints: 14pts, 308 yards (64.9%) (Won vs Vikings)
  • Bengals: 24pts, 428 yards (80.1%) (Lost to Patriots)
  • Patriots: 38pts, 376 yards (144.3%) (Won vs Bengals)
  • Panthers: 18pts, 237 yards (108.4%) (Lost to Giants)
  • Giants: 31pts, 376 yards (117.7%) (Won vs Panthers)
  • Colts: 24pts, 463 yards (74%) (Lost to Texans)
  • Texans: 34pts, 355 yards (136.8%) (Won vs Colts)
  • Chargers: 14pts, 389 yards (51.4%) (Lost to Chiefs)
  • Chiefs: 21pts, 197 yards (152%) (Won vs Chargers)
  • Bears: 19pts, 463 yards (58.6%) (Won vs Lions)
  • Lions: 14pts, 167 yards (119%) (Lost to Bears)

The numbers show this efficiency strongly effects the game in most situations.

Most interesting here is the fact that the Lions scored 119% in efficiency (yet lost to the Bears who had 58.6%) and it would have been must higher if they would have kept that final TD that was taken away. What is causing the issue is the fact that they were only able to muster 176 total yards yet were able to punch it in twice. I didn't watch the whole game. The scoring clearly had something to do with great field position, and this is a major reason why the Cowboys brought in DeCamillis. As I'm sure everyone remembers, the Cowboys had poor field position throughout the entire game against Washington except once. That one time the Cowboys have good field position, is the time the Cowboys actually scored.

The special teams were piss poor for the Cowboys when is definitely not the norm around here since DeCamillis joined the Cowboys.
 
The Bears won't be able to run the ball. They struggled all of last year, they struggled last week, and with our run D, I see that trend continuing.

Jay Cutler is gonna have to beat us, and I don't see that happening.
 
JBell523;3564083 said:
The Bears won't be able to run the ball. They struggled all of last year, they struggled last week, and with our run D, I see that trend continuing.

Jay Cutler is gonna have to beat us, and I don't see that happening.

I think the Lions were hell bent on stopping the run and the Bears used that against them when they started throwing screens out the ying/yang. Forte ended up with over 150+ yards receiving because the Lions soldout against the run.
 
nyc;3564090 said:
Forte ended up with over 150+ yards receiving because the Lions soldout against the run.

He had something like an 80 yard TD on a screen pass.

The Lions secondary outside of Delmas, blows.




YR
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,358
Messages
14,532,407
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top