kskboys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 49,714
- Reaction score
- 52,438
Especially players that are not physically talented enough to begin w/.Why? The franchise sucks. The culture is unserious and many players can’t overcome the toxic culture.
Especially players that are not physically talented enough to begin w/.Why? The franchise sucks. The culture is unserious and many players can’t overcome the toxic culture.
Should've been sitting and learning last season. Good thing is, he's the most talented OL on the roster, so maybe he'll take a big step this off.Didn't you get the memo, Jerry wasn't spending last year and he threw the rookies in at the deep end. Guyton was hardly a 1st Rd grader and was hardly a top of the round pick.
He wasn't.Guyton was a wasted pick.
Imo, the first and upfront priority is solidifying a unquestioned top notch OL coach in place.Why??
Cause its simply NOT TRUE
You choose not to resign Wisconsin who made the Pro Bowl here and was a starter on a Championship Game team with Washington
You drafted McGovern in 2019 in the 3rd who you also choose not to sign and who made the Pro Bowl with Buffalo
Smith made second team All Pro
Pretty good haul over five drafts. How many teams draft three OL over a five draft stretch that make a Pro Bowl, but of course it is simply not good enough in Dallas!
Wo-is-us
Judge Beebe and Guyton going forward.
And you got two division championships and three playoff appearances out of those investments
Ditto here.He wasn't.
Guyton only started a handful of games at tackle and it was at RT in collegeDitto here.
i prefer to wait until Guyton receives competent quality coaching under his feet before i signal wasted pick. ..I had heard that there could have been some indifference between the
coaching tutoring of OL guru Duke Merriweather ..vs OL coach Mike Solari . That could have added confusion with the rookie Guyton.
For a left handed QB. He was the blindside protector. Needs technique work.Guyton only started a handful of games at tackle and it was at RT in college
to me expecting him to start right away was a totally moronic decision.
So you got to give him at least another year at LT before doing something else
No. You're wrong.they clearly should have waited
Ding ding ding.Coaching/Scheme is the main issue.
Welcome to being wrong.Guyton was a wasted pick.
The O line certainly contributed to the record last year in a negative way. IT was not THE factor but certainly pat of it.You have to give them time.
Nine O-linemen started at least one game for the Cowoys in 2024.
Only two were not drafted or signed as rookie free agents by the Cowboys during the period specified, 2020-2024.
The starting lineup for the Cowboys last game of the season for the O-line was two rookies, one 2nd year player, one 3rd year player and one fourth year player.
In 2015 the Cowboys had three Pro Bowlers on the O-line, all 1st round picks. They went 4-12 that season.
The O-line wasn't responsible for last season's record. And that wasn't Saquon Barkley standing behind them.
Or move him to RT and let him develop at the less vital position.Guyton only started a handful of games at tackle and it was at RT in college
to me expecting him to start right away was a totally moronic decision.
So you got to give him at least another year at LT before doing something else
Sure, but then who do we play at OLT? Maybe a midrange FA?Or move him to RT and let him develop at the less vital position.
Dallas didn't even start top 10 pick Tyron Smith at LT as a rookie.
Guyton is a monster athlete, and Dallas has a great track record of hitting on highly drafted OL so I'd give him time; but I also wouldn't pencil him in at the most vital OL position.
I think TYLER SMITH is the most talented player on the O line.Should've been sitting and learning last season. Good thing is, he's the most talented OL on the roster, so maybe he'll take a big step this off.
So true. We expected two rookies playing new positions not to have some struggles? Beebe is gonna be fine, Guyton should be on right side but we don’t have a LtI think the key to the Eagles is taking more of a long-term view and not expecting O-linemen to just plug holes immediately as rookies (for the most part). Players are developed by excellent coaching and mentoring, and some develop faster and others more slowly but they also cut bait when it seems like it's not going to work (i.e. Dillard). Having a long term view with player development gives you a succession plan and takes the pressure of players to be day one pro-bowlers. It seems to work really well, and I wonder why other teams don't emulate the model?